Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Even in the last two rounds Burns wasn't landing anything of note. I don't think he would've scored a stoppage if Gonzalez didn't quit.
-
misterpunch
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
the man of granite turns to butter in a few short rounds
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1475
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Even if it turns out to be a legit injury, I think there's 0% chance of rematch dont you ?
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
That was quite possibly the most unsatisfactory end I've ever seen. Just as it was about to get interesting (tough) the guy does a bunk. He looked a million dollars for 7 rounds.
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
gonzalez quit,he didn't lose.
-
misterpunch
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
I dont think im the only one appalled by the way Gonzalez finished that.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.jonnyyorkshu wrote:i was the one who brought up Broner,harsh calling Burns a fraud,limited but no fraud.PS Broner is everything wrong with boxing.Fat Git wrote:was that aimed at me tubs?jonnyyorkshu wrote:Can't stand Burns - he is everything that is wrong with boxing.
Yeah yeah, I know it was Gonzalez who quit - bring in Broner and knock this
'champion' out once and for all.
Not particulary - why would I aim it at you?
I haven't like this fradulent reign for a long time now, Nelson coming
on here lauding it doesn't help. No offence but you don't come into it.
Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No
Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.
Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4733
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Other fighters would have fought through a broken wrist esp when seemingly well ahead at the time.Finch wrote:Perhaps he threw nothing because he was fighting with a broken wrist? To say Gonzales has no heart is such a knee jerk reaction. It's easier said than done fighting with a broken wrist.ShadrachSimmo wrote:Gonzalez shat it. That's how it appears. He may have broken his wrist but those last 2 rounds he barely threw anything he looked disheartened. Ach well burns escapes with his title. Just..
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
12 belts? Stop being a cock.Fat Git wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.
Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No
Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.
Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
-
CiganoBoxer
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
How can Burns celebrate winning like that ?
Burns had the c*nt punched out of him un till the other guy broke a limb hitting him at will for 7 rounds .
Bronner will slaughter Burns .
Burns had the c*nt punched out of him un till the other guy broke a limb hitting him at will for 7 rounds .
Bronner will slaughter Burns .
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Because he kept his title. Why shouldn't he celebrate?mrpedigree wrote:How can Burns celebrate winning like that ?
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Whereas you can never stop.Horse wrote:12 belts? Stop being a cock.Fat Git wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.
Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No
Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.
Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.
Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No
Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.
Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.-fat git
so IYO who are world champs?? (this should be great).
Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No
Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.
Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.-fat git
so IYO who are world champs?? (this should be great).
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
I agree, it was hardly a table-turning effort, more like the start of something that needed a "helluva lot" of seeing through.thepocketrocket wrote:Total spin, I am pretty appaled.Kilburn wrote:What you reckon pocket?thepocketrocket wrote:Gonzalez wasn't getting caught though...that's why there is such surprise
Damn I can hear "We close our eyes" being played ringside. That make up for any dodginess.
It isn't Burn's fault Gonzo had no heart, but lets not pretend he had started working him over, because that is plain garbage from the SKY team
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4733
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
What would you have him do after being in the brink of losing his title?mrpedigree wrote:How can Burns celebrate winning like that ?
Burns had the c*nt punched out of him un till the other guy broke a limb hitting him at will for 7 rounds .
Bronner will slaughter Burns .
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16771
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
For what it's worth, you are being a cock.Fat Git wrote:Whereas you can never stop.Horse wrote:12 belts? Stop being a cock.Fat Git wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.
Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No
Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.
Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Exactly, couldn't put it better myselfKilburn wrote:
I agree, it was hardly a table-turning effort, more like the start of something that needed a "helluva lot" of seeing through.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
jonnyyorkshu wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.
Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No
Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.
Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.-fat git
so IYO who are world champs?? (this should be great).
There is 11 world title sanctioning bodies out there today - I have just counted them, and thats the problem and that is why we have the likes of Ricky Burns calling himself 'world champion'.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Broner isn't even on the radar anymore.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
But I am right - as usual!keithmoonhangover wrote:For what it's worth, you are being a cock.Fat Git wrote:12 belts? Stop being a cock.Horse wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.
Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No
Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.
Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
Whereas you can never stop.
I was one world sanctioning body out with my guess. The state of boxing today Keith - you might think it is great but I don't.
And what you know about boxing - you could write on the back of a stamp.
-
markfightoptions
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 04 Dec 2011, 09:51
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Final round wrote:Did someone trigger the well payed get out clause during the break.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Only four are regarded as world titles by most.Fat Git wrote:There is 11 world title sanctioning bodies out there today - I have just counted them, and thats the problem and that is why we have the likes of Ricky Burns calling himself 'world champion'.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Lets be honest, its never gonna happen in a million years but who would like to see a rematch?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16771
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
He's ranked 3 by BoxRec and The Ring Magazine. It doesn't matter how many belts there are. He got those ratings by boxing.Fat Git wrote:But I am right - as usual!keithmoonhangover wrote:For what it's worth, you are being a cock.
I was one world sanctioning body out with my guess. The state of boxing today Keith - you might think it is great but I don't.
And what you know about boxing - you could write on the back of a stamp.