Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

boxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 25
Joined: 11 Jan 2004, 20:12

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by boxing »

Even in the last two rounds Burns wasn't landing anything of note. I don't think he would've scored a stoppage if Gonzalez didn't quit.
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by misterpunch »

the man of granite turns to butter in a few short rounds
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1475
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Even if it turns out to be a legit injury, I think there's 0% chance of rematch dont you ?
youngrell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2381
Joined: 30 Jun 2008, 15:56

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by youngrell »

That was quite possibly the most unsatisfactory end I've ever seen. Just as it was about to get interesting (tough) the guy does a bunk. He looked a million dollars for 7 rounds.
jonnyyorkshu
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 449
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by jonnyyorkshu »

gonzalez quit,he didn't lose.
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by misterpunch »

?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by lefty »

I dont think im the only one appalled by the way Gonzalez finished that.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

jonnyyorkshu wrote:
Fat Git wrote:
jonnyyorkshu wrote:Can't stand Burns - he is everything that is wrong with boxing.

Yeah yeah, I know it was Gonzalez who quit - bring in Broner and knock this
'champion' out once and for all. :roll:
was that aimed at me tubs?

Not particulary - why would I aim it at you?

I haven't like this fradulent reign for a long time now, Nelson coming
on here lauding it doesn't help. No offence but you don't come into it. :D
i was the one who brought up Broner,harsh calling Burns a fraud,limited but no fraud.PS Broner is everything wrong with boxing.
He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.

Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No

Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.

Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Finch wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:Gonzalez shat it. That's how it appears. He may have broken his wrist but those last 2 rounds he barely threw anything he looked disheartened. Ach well burns escapes with his title. Just..
Perhaps he threw nothing because he was fighting with a broken wrist? To say Gonzales has no heart is such a knee jerk reaction. It's easier said than done fighting with a broken wrist.
Other fighters would have fought through a broken wrist esp when seemingly well ahead at the time.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Horse »

Fat Git wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.

Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No

Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.

Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
12 belts? Stop being a cock.
CiganoBoxer
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by CiganoBoxer »

How can Burns celebrate winning like that ?
Burns had the c*nt punched out of him un till the other guy broke a limb hitting him at will for 7 rounds .
Bronner will slaughter Burns .
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Horse »

mrpedigree wrote:How can Burns celebrate winning like that ?
Because he kept his title. Why shouldn't he celebrate?
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Horse wrote:
Fat Git wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.

Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No

Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.

Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
12 belts? Stop being a cock.
Whereas you can never stop. :TU:
jonnyyorkshu
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 449
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by jonnyyorkshu »

He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.

Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No

Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.

Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.-fat git

so IYO who are world champs?? (this should be great).
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6573
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Kilburn »

thepocketrocket wrote:
Kilburn wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Gonzalez wasn't getting caught though...that's why there is such surprise
What you reckon pocket?

Damn I can hear "We close our eyes" being played ringside. That make up for any dodginess.
Total spin, I am pretty appaled.

It isn't Burn's fault Gonzo had no heart, but lets not pretend he had started working him over, because that is plain garbage from the SKY team
I agree, it was hardly a table-turning effort, more like the start of something that needed a "helluva lot" of seeing through.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

mrpedigree wrote:How can Burns celebrate winning like that ?
Burns had the c*nt punched out of him un till the other guy broke a limb hitting him at will for 7 rounds .
Bronner will slaughter Burns .
What would you have him do after being in the brink of losing his title?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16771
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Fat Git wrote:
Horse wrote:
Fat Git wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.

Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No

Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.

Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
12 belts? Stop being a cock.
Whereas you can never stop. :TU:
For what it's worth, you are being a cock.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by thepocketrocket »

Kilburn wrote:
I agree, it was hardly a table-turning effort, more like the start of something that needed a "helluva lot" of seeing through.
Exactly, couldn't put it better myself
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

jonnyyorkshu wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.

Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No

Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.

Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.-fat git

so IYO who are world champs?? (this should be great).

There is 11 world title sanctioning bodies out there today - I have just counted them, and thats the problem and that is why we have the likes of Ricky Burns calling himself 'world champion'.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6573
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Kilburn »

Broner isn't even on the radar anymore.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Fat Git wrote:
Horse wrote:He isn't a fraud, his reign as a world champion is though.

Would he have been world champion if there wasn't 12 belts flying around? No

Is he a good solid, European level fighter? Yes, and he was damn lucky tonight.

Broner would knock out the real problem of boxing - champions who aren't world class. It is like Scotland winning one of 12 versions of the world cup and calling themselves 'world champions'.
12 belts? Stop being a cock.
Whereas you can never stop. :TU:
For what it's worth, you are being a cock.
But I am right - as usual!

I was one world sanctioning body out with my guess. The state of boxing today Keith - you might think it is great but I don't. :TU:

And what you know about boxing - you could write on the back of a stamp.
markfightoptions
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 255
Joined: 04 Dec 2011, 09:51

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by markfightoptions »

Final round wrote:Did someone trigger the well payed get out clause during the break.
:TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by Horse »

Fat Git wrote:There is 11 world title sanctioning bodies out there today - I have just counted them, and thats the problem and that is why we have the likes of Ricky Burns calling himself 'world champion'.
Only four are regarded as world titles by most.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by lefty »

Lets be honest, its never gonna happen in a million years but who would like to see a rematch?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16771
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Fat Git wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:For what it's worth, you are being a cock.
But I am right - as usual!

I was one world sanctioning body out with my guess. The state of boxing today Keith - you might think it is great but I don't. :TU:

And what you know about boxing - you could write on the back of a stamp.
He's ranked 3 by BoxRec and The Ring Magazine. It doesn't matter how many belts there are. He got those ratings by boxing.
Post Reply