Whats a stupid post. Macklin and Barker didnt make the distance against Martinez, who should have really lost the decision and was floored twice against Murray. BJS isnt in the same league as these guys yet. Froch, Groves and degale are SMW's.Sids wrote:2 decent showings = a draw and a loss but eh he has beaten 13-0 council worker from south america and schooled a 20yr old 8-0 college student, Seriously Macklin or Barker would bat him Froch, Groves or Degale would eat him alive I would even go as far to say Saunders would beat him.TJ77 wrote:Given 2 decent showings against world class opponents and the domestic rivals swerving him i'd say he has proved himself worthy of being highly rated.Sids wrote:Total mismatch, Murray is the most over rated fighter in the game Chavez wins by ko.
Murray V Chavez Jr apparently in the works?
Re: Murray V Chavez Jr apparently in the works?
Re: Murray V Chavez Jr apparently in the works?
2 decent showings = a draw and a loss but eh he has beaten 13-0 council worker from south america and schooled a 20yr old 8-0 college student, Seriously Macklin or Barker would bat him Froch, Groves or Degale would eat him alive I would even go as far to say Saunders would beat him.[/quote]
Whats a stupid post. Macklin and Barker didnt make the distance against Martinez, who should have really lost the decision and was floored twice against Murray. BJS isnt in the same league as these guys yet. Froch, Groves and degale are SMW's.[/quote]
Are u a bitter ex of Martins?? Or someone he refused a pic?
The South American was a big puncher who was hungry and dangerous and he wanted the British and only Nick would step up and fight Martin beat him quite easily and convincingly compared to when he boxed BJS no disrespect to him.
He did better than Barker or Macklin in his bid against Martinez rest are SuperMiddleweight different division??
Who do you think he should fight next Jamie McDonnell
Whats a stupid post. Macklin and Barker didnt make the distance against Martinez, who should have really lost the decision and was floored twice against Murray. BJS isnt in the same league as these guys yet. Froch, Groves and degale are SMW's.[/quote]
Are u a bitter ex of Martins?? Or someone he refused a pic?
The South American was a big puncher who was hungry and dangerous and he wanted the British and only Nick would step up and fight Martin beat him quite easily and convincingly compared to when he boxed BJS no disrespect to him.
He did better than Barker or Macklin in his bid against Martinez rest are SuperMiddleweight different division??
Who do you think he should fight next Jamie McDonnell
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Murray V Chavez Jr apparently in the works?
It's off. Murray v Barker please.
Re: Murray V Chavez Jr apparently in the works?
Final round wrote:It's off. Murray v Barker please.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Murray V Chavez Jr apparently in the works?
Was it ever on ?
Might just be me but I have to say I'm glad.
I think Chavez is / was all wrong for Martin.
FFS let's get this round robin going.
Barker Macklin Murray Lee.
Sick of hearing them all spout about who's the best.
Get in the ring and prove it !
Better for the UK public than Super Six this.
Might just be me but I have to say I'm glad.
I think Chavez is / was all wrong for Martin.
FFS let's get this round robin going.
Barker Macklin Murray Lee.
Sick of hearing them all spout about who's the best.
Get in the ring and prove it !
Better for the UK public than Super Six this.
Re: Murray V Chavez Jr apparently in the works?
Shame BJS isnt a bit further along in his careerParson Cross wrote:Was it ever on ?
Might just be me but I have to say I'm glad.
I think Chavez is / was all wrong for Martin.
FFS let's get this round robin going.
Barker Macklin Murray Lee.
Sick of hearing them all spout about who's the best.
Get in the ring and prove it !
Better for the UK public than Super Six this.