Barker v Geale

Post Reply
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Barker v Geale

Post by earsjohn »

Can't see a thread on this, so....

Barker gets his 2nd shot at a world title when he takes on Aussie IBF champ, Daniel Geale, in New York on August 17th.

While Geale is one of the weaker 160lb champions, by most modern standards he is a worthy titlist having beaten Sylvester, Sturm (for the WBA title that was later stripped and "handed" to Golovkin) and avenging a prior defeat to Anthony Mundine.

It's a great opportunity for Barker and having it on neutral ground is a bonus. Given this summers sporting battles between UK and Australia (3 Lions tests, 5 ashes tests), another UK v Aussie battle in the midst of summer should be a pretty easy sell, in a traditionally quiet time for boxing.

I'm looking forward to it.
Terrrrry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 519
Joined: 06 May 2010, 21:52

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by Terrrrry »

A good, solid, interesting fight.

If Barker performs like he did for the first 10 rounds of the Martinez fight, he'll win.
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by johnswan1 »

Barker will get hit in the face and then quit.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by lefty »

Hopefully Geale wins because of Barker going for the weak link.
SamWise72
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by SamWise72 »

I don't think you can blame Barker for fighting Geale; after all, he already fought the #1 and came up only a little short. I'm not sure someone like him gets every option laid out and selects who he wants.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by DMA1987 »

Can't believe anybody is criticising Barker for facing Geale. What is wrong with people?
columbo wrote:Hopefully Geale wins because of Barker going for the weak link.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23242
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by handsofstone »

Very evenly matched fight,both quite similar in styles,not too gung-ho but like to let the punches go and both are tough whatever else people say about Darren Barker he,s still a tough fighter,technically sound and has looked good since the Sergio Martinez fight albeit against lesser opposition,at least he never laboured against them so im inclined to think that he,s still got a lot to offer,im a big fan of Barker,i think he,s very underreated
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by lefty »

SamWise72 wrote:I don't think you can blame Barker for fighting Geale; after all, he already fought the #1 and came up only a little short. I'm not sure someone like him gets every option laid out and selects who he wants.
Why didnt he try and fight Golovkin then before his fight with Macklin was made then?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by Horse »

columbo wrote:Hopefully Geale wins because of Barker going for the weak link.
Barker has already tried to beat the best when he fought Martinez.

Was your post a joke?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by lefty »

Horse wrote:
columbo wrote:Hopefully Geale wins because of Barker going for the weak link.
Barker has already tried to beat the best when he fought Martinez.

Was your post a joke?
No. He could of tried to fight Golovkin or Quillin. Golovkin in particuliar hasnt exactly found it easy to get fights and in terms of cost I doubt he'd be that expensive. Lets be honest though, he'd never take that fight though as he'd get knocked out.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by ScottDetonator »

If Barker can get that world title then it'd be massive for UK boxing because you'd bank on him defending it over here and we'd be looking at opponents such as Murray, Macklin etc. Sturm would be a good one at Wembley for instance.

Obviously, it's a big ask. Geale has great stamina and will push Darren over 12. I think Barker might just come out swinging early on which would be a mistake. Geale will be there all night. Fingers crossed for Barker to do it though :box:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23242
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by handsofstone »

Has GGG been elevated to "Super" champ yet,i checked WBA website last month and he was still "Regular" and the super was vacant,surely if you hold the regular and the super refuses to fight you then as soon as the super champs stripped then the regular champ becomes super champ immedeitly,no?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by Horse »

columbo wrote:No. He could of tried to fight Golovkin or Quillin. Golovkin in particuliar hasnt exactly found it easy to get fights and in terms of cost I doubt he'd be that expensive.
Geale is more proven than Golovkin or Quillin, he might be better than them.
columbo wrote:Lets be honest though, he'd never take that fight though as he'd get knocked out.
He took the Martinez fight and got knocked out. Why would he be so afraid of losing to Golovkin?

Your attack on Barker is absurd.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by DMA1987 »

Horse wrote:
columbo wrote:No. He could of tried to fight Golovkin or Quillin. Golovkin in particuliar hasnt exactly found it easy to get fights and in terms of cost I doubt he'd be that expensive.
Geale is more proven than Golovkin or Quillin, he might be better than them.
columbo wrote:Lets be honest though, he'd never take that fight though as he'd get knocked out.
He took the Martinez fight and got knocked out. Why would he be so afraid of losing to Golovkin?

Your attack on Barker is absurd.
:TU: I'd say pathetic
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by lefty »

Horse wrote:
columbo wrote:No. He could of tried to fight Golovkin or Quillin. Golovkin in particuliar hasnt exactly found it easy to get fights and in terms of cost I doubt he'd be that expensive.
Geale is more proven than Golovkin or Quillin, he might be better than them.
columbo wrote:Lets be honest though, he'd never take that fight though as he'd get knocked out.
He took the Martinez fight and got knocked out. Why would he be so afraid of losing to Golovkin?

Your attack on Barker is absurd.
Is Geale definietly more proven than those two guys though? Who are his best wins.... Mundine? Who whilst beating, he also lost to. Sturm? *who ran a mile from Golovkin and the WBA elevated him to super champion for that purpose*. Sebastian Sylvester? who Gregorz Prokska knocked out in 3 rounds. ..... Also why doesnt he hold the WBA super title anymore that he won again Sturm? Is it because he vacated it rather than fight Golovkin down the line?
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by DMA1987 »

columbo wrote:
Horse wrote:
columbo wrote:No. He could of tried to fight Golovkin or Quillin. Golovkin in particuliar hasnt exactly found it easy to get fights and in terms of cost I doubt he'd be that expensive.
Geale is more proven than Golovkin or Quillin, he might be better than them.
columbo wrote:Lets be honest though, he'd never take that fight though as he'd get knocked out.
He took the Martinez fight and got knocked out. Why would he be so afraid of losing to Golovkin?

Your attack on Barker is absurd.
Is Geale definietly more proven than those two guys though? Who are his best wins.... Mundine? Who whilst beating, he also lost to. Sturm? *who ran a mile from Golovkin and the WBA elevated him to super champion for that purpose*. Sebastian Sylvester? who Gregorz Prokska knocked out in 3 rounds. ..... Also why doesnt he hold the WBA super title anymore that he won again Sturm? Is it because he vacated it rather than fight Golovkin down the line?
Who is Golovkins best win? I think the question is more who Golovkin has fought rather than who the others haven't. The fact of the matter is that Golovkins record contains no more, and probably less, good fighters than Geale. Sturm is a win which is head and shoulders above Golovkins record.

For you to come on and say you hope Barker loses for taking an easy route, when the 'hard' route is an unproven Golovkin, is tragic. Its a british fighter, fighting for a legitimate title in what will be a good fight. Again it's pathetic to hope he loses just because he didn't fight the less proven but more hyped fighter.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by Final round »

I'm looking forward to this both orthodox fighters with Barker's edge in power and Geale's high work rate .
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by DMA1987 »

Final round wrote:I'm looking forward to this both orthodox fighters with Barker's edge in power and Geale's high work rate .
Should be a cracker, who do you think gets it? Favouring Barker personally.
mfc_se15
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 08:34

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by mfc_se15 »

I think its a good fight and I'm looking forward to it. Any ideas why it is in New York though? Just a compromise due to where both fighters are from or is there another reason - i.e is this the headline fight or will it be the support to something else?
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by Final round »

DMA1987 wrote:
Final round wrote:I'm looking forward to this both orthodox fighters with Barker's edge in power and Geale's high work rate .
Should be a cracker, who do you think gets it? Favouring Barker personally.
Yeah I agree i think Barker is in with a great chance if he catches Geale i think he'll do him, he's a decent finisher but the Tasmanian is adaptable has a great engine and will try and rack up the points.

Re fighting in New York, Geales promoted by Gary Shaw stateside, but a good neutral venue for both
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by Deserter »

Final round wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
Final round wrote:I'm looking forward to this both orthodox fighters with Barker's edge in power and Geale's high work rate .
Should be a cracker, who do you think gets it? Favouring Barker personally.
Yeah I agree i think Barker is in with a great chance if he catches Geale i think he'll do him, he's a decent finisher but the Tasmanian is adaptable has a great engine and will try and rack up the points.

Re fighting in New York, Geales promoted by Gary Shaw stateside, but a good neutral venue for both
Unfortunately I see Geale edging a close points decision, with Barker in front after six, but tiring in the second half while the Tasmanian comes on strong...
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by Final round »

Deserter wrote:
Final round wrote: Unfortunately I see Geale edging a close points decision, with Barker in front after six, but tiring in the second half while the Tasmanian comes on strong...
:TU: good call
ajwesty13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Barker v Geale

Post by ajwesty13 »

I made up for Barker to have another shot at a title... he has been plagued by injuries which meant he could never really train fully... fortunately he now says his injuries are in the past and can train harder.. i would love to see darren pick up a title before he retires.. just because i think barker is a very technically graceful boxer...
Post Reply