Rendall Munroe

Post Reply
josco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Rendall Munroe

Post by josco »

Noticed that Rendall was close to lightweight in his comeback fight (pretty emphatic victory) - does anyone what weight he will be campaigning at in future?
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by pyenest77 »

He said he will be campaigning at lightweight. He was always a massive superbantam, but bizarrely a couple of years ago he was talking about going down to bantam!
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by Chambers2 »

josco wrote:Noticed that Rendall was close to lightweight in his comeback fight (pretty emphatic victory) - does anyone what weight he will be campaigning at in future?
Think I heard on Sky that he was coming back at Lightweight
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by polecateddy »

His big assets were size and strength at super bantam. He will get bombed at British title level.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by palooka »

polecateddy wrote:His big assets were size and strength at super bantam. He will get bombed at British title level.
I'm not sure; if he really boiled down he would have been at 70% of his best. There are boxers that do better with a rise in weight, the thing is keeping him busy; he's not happy waiting about etc etc, he wants to get on. His manager/promoter should get in gear now; I think he'll do well.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by tear up »

He'd do we'll at super feather weight
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by bripez »

palooka wrote:
polecateddy wrote:His big assets were size and strength at super bantam. He will get bombed at British title level.
I'm not sure; if he really boiled down he would have been at 70% of his best. There are boxers that do better with a rise in weight, the thing is keeping him busy; he's not happy waiting about etc etc, he wants to get on. His manager/promoter should get in gear now; I think he'll do well.
You could be right Palooka.

This is the classic boxers mentality - "if I am strong at this weight, then if I move down then I will be even stronger compared to my opponents" - which is not always the case, sometimes the boxer could be stronger by moving up a weight.

I am not surprised he is moving up in weight as he always looked ripped without much to spare, but am surprised that he is looking to move up 3 weight divisions in one go (maybe this indicates how difficult it was for him to make super bantam ?).

I wonder what weight he walks around at ?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by Counter-puncher »

bripez wrote:
palooka wrote:
polecateddy wrote:His big assets were size and strength at super bantam. He will get bombed at British title level.
I'm not sure; if he really boiled down he would have been at 70% of his best. There are boxers that do better with a rise in weight, the thing is keeping him busy; he's not happy waiting about etc etc, he wants to get on. His manager/promoter should get in gear now; I think he'll do well.
You could be right Palooka.

This is the classic boxers mentality - "if I am strong at this weight, then if I move down then I will be even stronger compared to my opponents" - which is not always the case, sometimes the boxer could be stronger by moving up a weight.

I am not surprised he is moving up in weight as he always looked ripped without much to spare, but am surprised that he is looking to move up 3 weight divisions in one go (maybe this indicates how difficult it was for him to make super bantam ?).

I wonder what weight he walks around at ?

I heard once that he was at least 11 stone and still pretty lean FWIW
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by palooka »

Vinny Paz jumped a few divisions and I thought he was crazy (ok he was pretty crazy) but he did really well; I don't imagine Rendall will do as well but hope he gets the chance to prove a point.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by polecateddy »

Crolla or Matthews beats him, and he retires again.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by magnus »

Selby is a bit short for potential British opponents, if he's prepared to make Feather...
Looking On
Super Middleweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 13:50

Re: Rendall Munroe

Post by Looking On »

I saw him at an unlicensed show in leicester (as a spectator of course)
and he looked huge considering the weight he was boxing at , but still looked in shape to me , id say 11 stone was probably not far off counter puncher :TU:
Post Reply