as much as I went back and forth with Saad, I would never report another poster. Fvckin dog needs to be put to sleep.Blodhemn wrote:Upset Rover.Tanzio wrote:WTH he do this time?gilgamesh wrote:
Banned again
He is thanking his lucky stars he got banned tonight.
Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
Had the 1st even. Can't score a round for someone who didn't land punches, this ain't no Burt Sugar retelling of the Willie Pep round.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
Tanzio wrote:as much as I went back and forth with Saad, I would never report another poster. Fvckin dog needs to be put to sleep.Blodhemn wrote:Upset Rover.Tanzio wrote:
WTH he do this time?
He is thanking his lucky stars he got banned tonight.
Yeah same. Saad trolled at times but who cares, many posters do the same thing.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
I thought Lamont landed enough to shade it.Blodhemn wrote:Had the 1st even. Can't score a round for someone who didn't land punches, this ain't no Burt Sugar retelling of the Willie Pep round.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
This post is full-blown retard. Alexander robbed Matthysse, and that wasn't a claim that just got fabricated in the wake of this fight. Alexander didn't outbox anything, and his punches had less than nothing on them. Matthysse whooped Alexander's ass, Alexander dealt no damage in return, and the only thing that scored points on the judge's scorecards was Don King's bribe money.Bobbyptsd wrote:People seem to be forgetting awful quick that he got outboxed soundly against Alexander. I mean, it's funny how that result got changed to an official "shaft" a few minutes ago when at the time of their fight, most people believed Alexander beat him pretty clearly.
It's fine to start a bandwagon, let's just not drive it off a cliff.
From Post subject: Re: Robbery - is this term thrown around too much?, April 24, 2013.
Lackeos wrote:Alexander robbed Matthyse.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
Matthysse clearly beat Alexander. I actually think the Judah decision was fair as Lucas gave up so many early rounds, but the Alexander fight wasn't even that close.
If Matthysse goes and destroys Garcia, the likely outcome, he's the clear Mayweather opponent below 154.
If Matthysse goes and destroys Garcia, the likely outcome, he's the clear Mayweather opponent below 154.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
Wow, at least you're not overacting.Tanzio wrote:WTF fight were YOU watching?! Matthysse got robbed clearly in that bullsh!t 10 rounder.Bobbyptsd wrote:People seem to be forgetting awful quick that he got outboxed soundly against Alexander. I mean, it's funny how that result got changed to an official "shaft" a few minutes ago when at the time of their fight, most people believed Alexander beat him pretty clearly.
It's fine to start a bandwagon, let's just not drive it off a cliff.
Just sit the fvck down. This is Mathysse's night, and there are a whole lot of teams working on their strategies to avoid this beast.
Matthysse may be the reason that the Canelo fight happens with FMJ in September now.
Mathysse lost to Alexander, but you are the one who had Bradley beating Pac, so I suppose you never got your eyes fixed.
Regardless, Mathysse has nothing to do with what Floyd will do next. You are getting incredibly carried away.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
You're quoting yourself, because you are of course a reliable source? I mean if you said it, right?Lackeos wrote:This post is full-blown retard. Alexander robbed Matthysse, and that wasn't a claim that just got fabricated in the wake of this fight. Alexander didn't outbox anything, and his punches had less than nothing on them. Matthysse whooped Alexander's ass, Alexander dealt no damage in return, and the only thing that scored points on the judge's scorecards was Don King's bribe money.Bobbyptsd wrote:People seem to be forgetting awful quick that he got outboxed soundly against Alexander. I mean, it's funny how that result got changed to an official "shaft" a few minutes ago when at the time of their fight, most people believed Alexander beat him pretty clearly.
It's fine to start a bandwagon, let's just not drive it off a cliff.
From Post subject: Re: Robbery - is this term thrown around too much?, April 24, 2013.Lackeos wrote:Alexander robbed Matthyse.
At least you're not conceited or anything.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
Now put that dead carcass back up your ass for use the next time that you have no defense.Bobbyptsd wrote:Wow, at least you're not overacting.Tanzio wrote:WTF fight were YOU watching?! Matthysse got robbed clearly in that bullsh!t 10 rounder.Bobbyptsd wrote:People seem to be forgetting awful quick that he got outboxed soundly against Alexander. I mean, it's funny how that result got changed to an official "shaft" a few minutes ago when at the time of their fight, most people believed Alexander beat him pretty clearly.
It's fine to start a bandwagon, let's just not drive it off a cliff.
Just sit the fvck down. This is Mathysse's night, and there are a whole lot of teams working on their strategies to avoid this beast.
Matthysse may be the reason that the Canelo fight happens with FMJ in September now.
Mathysse lost to Alexander, but you are the one who had Bradley beating Pac, so I suppose you never got your eyes fixed.
Regardless, Mathysse has nothing to do with what Floyd will do next. You are getting incredibly carried away.
I am not getting carried away at all. When someone detonates good boxers like Lamont Peterson the way Matthysse does, it effects the future plans of other good boxers. Hence, the prospect of Danny vs FMJ improved significantly, as did the prospect of FMJ vs Canelo.
FMJ vs Matthysse is the one that is very likely not to take place. Not because FMJ can't beat him, but because of the risk involved.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
^
He lost, whether you like it or not.
And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.
FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.
He lost, whether you like it or not.
And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.
FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
Bobbyptsd wrote:^
He lost, whether you like it or not.
And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.
FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.
There's 36 minutes of risk every time someone boxes a man who swings for the fences and ca turn their lives around with a win; that's why lots of us choose to continue to believe in this sport.
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
Is their anyone Mayweather fights that's a big reward?Bobbyptsd wrote:^
He lost, whether you like it or not.
And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.
FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
I'd not thought of that beforeworld ranked wrote:Is their anyone Mayweather fights that's a big reward?Bobbyptsd wrote:^
He lost, whether you like it or not.
And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.
FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.
Re: Lamont Peterson vs Lucas Matthysse RBR
And Pac lost, whether you like it or not. Although I will admit that Bradley won a closer fight than the robbery that was awarded to Alexander.Bobbyptsd wrote:^
He lost, whether you like it or not.
And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.
FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.
And credibility . . . come on, man . . . you are a psychological super fund site.