He should drop back down to SM, he would do ok there.
If you can't beat Bellew then it's not a good sign at Lt heavy.
CHILEMBA
-
kaiserbill
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 355
- Joined: 29 Jun 2011, 18:11
Re: CHILEMBA
I think the general consensus is that he did indeed beat Bellew.Ratchet Exits Nu wrote:He should drop back down to SM, he would do ok there.
If you can't beat Bellew then it's not a good sign at Lt heavy.
The draw was kind to Bellew, at home.
-
Ratchet Exits Nu
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 645
- Joined: 26 Sep 2012, 18:04
Re: CHILEMBA
Very true. I meant officially.kaiserbill wrote:I think the general consensus is that he did indeed beat Bellew.Ratchet Exits Nu wrote:He should drop back down to SM, he would do ok there.
If you can't beat Bellew then it's not a good sign at Lt heavy.
The draw was kind to Bellew, at home.
-
kaiserbill
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 355
- Joined: 29 Jun 2011, 18:11
Re: CHILEMBA
Your question is interesting and valid, as I personally feel that Chilemba, whilst skilfull and tricky, possibly lacks power at the higher weight.Ratchet Exits Nu wrote:Very true. I meant officially.kaiserbill wrote:I think the general consensus is that he did indeed beat Bellew.Ratchet Exits Nu wrote:He should drop back down to SM, he would do ok there.
If you can't beat Bellew then it's not a good sign at Lt heavy.
The draw was kind to Bellew, at home.