Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

For RBR threads only
EduardosFist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 238
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 02:13

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by EduardosFist »

rip dawson. one of the most overrated fighters i've ever seen.
dajuggernaut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by dajuggernaut »

Blodhemn wrote:Told yall. Diddy and everyone who thought only Ward is good enough to beat Dawson. What do you say now?
Pascal beat him too.
kayfoo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 15 Aug 2010, 01:59

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by kayfoo »

EduardosFist wrote:rip dawson. one of the most overrated fighters i've ever seen.
Wasted talent at its best.
Last edited by kayfoo on 09 Jun 2013, 00:12, edited 1 time in total.
dajuggernaut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by dajuggernaut »

polecateddy wrote:And immediately Froch has an exciting fresh opponent instead of endless rematches.
Ward has an exciting fresh opponent. Froch probably wouldn't even fight him unless it's in England.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by polecateddy »

dajuggernaut wrote:
polecateddy wrote:And immediately Froch has an exciting fresh opponent instead of endless rematches.
Ward has an exciting fresh opponent. Froch probably wouldn't even fight him unless it's in England.
Big off Yankie! Ward is about as interesting as watching paint dry!
dajuggernaut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by dajuggernaut »

What does interesting have to do with anything?

The Dawson fight was very interesting, Kessler was an exciting fight. Froch wasn't bad. Bika was a good physical fight. I didn't care much for the Green fight. Ward boring is made up because people can't knock his skills.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by polecateddy »

dajuggernaut wrote:What does interesting have to do with anything?

The Dawson fight was very interesting, Kessler was an exciting fight. Froch wasn't bad. Bika was a good physical fight. I didn't care much for the Green fight. Ward boring is made up because people can't knock his skills.
The result of Ward/Stevenson may be interesting. Probably a likely Ward shut-out. Froch/Stevenson on the other hand would be an exciting, unpredictable war. And probably a genuinely memorable contest.
dajuggernaut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by dajuggernaut »

All of Ward's fights are likely to end in a wide decision, So he's not supposed to fight the top guys because it's a foregone conclusion?

He can fight Froch as a comeback fight. I bet Stevenson is more interested in fighting the top dog instead of someone ranked lower anyway.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by polecateddy »

dajuggernaut wrote:All of Ward's fights are likely to end in a wide decision, So he's not supposed to fight the top guys because it's a foregone conclusion?

He can fight Froch as a comeback fight. I bet Stevenson is more interested in fighting the top dog instead of someone ranked lower anyway.
Froch is probably far better box office. Probably he can fight both.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by Blodhemn »

Stevenson-Ward is certainly a good match. Favor Ward but Stevenson is a real puncher and has a legit shot at a KO and vice versa since his chin isn't good.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by polecateddy »

For the fans Stevenson v Froch and Stevenson v Pascal are about ten times more exciting than fights involving Ward or Hopkins.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by Blodhemn »

I don't know, if Stevenson KO'd Ward, that'd be pretty exciting, no? :OhYes:
dajuggernaut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by dajuggernaut »

I bet you thought Abraham was going to knock Ward out.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by Blodhemn »

No, but I wish he would've.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by gilgamesh »

EduardosFist wrote:rip dawson. one of the most overrated fighters i've ever seen.
That's not fair to him, he's had a very good career I think he can still come back. He got caught cold in the 1st round, it happens sometimes...Dawson's still young enougn and skilled enough to come back and do something in the sport. 2 KO losses in a row though, he's definitely going to want to dial back the difficulty of competiton for his next few fights I'd have to think.
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1631
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by victor-romeo »

diddy wrote:Enough of these opponents for Yuri. Time to fight the big dogs.
:TU:
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1631
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by victor-romeo »

JCS wrote:Going down in weight and getting your brains scrambled.. not good for your career.
:TU:
Butterbean
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 490
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by Butterbean »

Thats a fight to make next. Let stevenson and froch go at it. Looks like stevenson has a pretty good depth to his punch.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by polecateddy »

Butterbean wrote:Thats a fight to make next. Let stevenson and froch go at it. Looks like stevenson has a pretty good depth to his punch.
Lets hope Ward stays out of the picture, his style makes Sven Ottke look entertaining!
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

Butterbean wrote:Thats a fight to make next. Let stevenson and froch go at it. Looks like stevenson has a pretty good depth to his punch.
I dont think Eddie Hearn will want any part of Stevenson for Froch. You have to remember that Stevenson was the mandatory for the IBF strap when that was the sole belt that Froch was holding. Hearn didnt want any part of it then! Froch himself would be willing to fight him I think as Froch will fight anyone but Hearn would stop it from happening I think. Also Bellew is the mandatory for Stevensons title now!
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by polecateddy »

columbo wrote:
Butterbean wrote:Thats a fight to make next. Let stevenson and froch go at it. Looks like stevenson has a pretty good depth to his punch.
I dont think Eddie Hearn will want any part of Stevenson for Froch. You have to remember that Stevenson was the mandatory for the IBF strap when that was the sole belt that Froch was holding. Hearn didnt want any part of it then! Froch himself would be willing to fight him I think as Froch will fight anyone but Hearn would stop it from happening I think. Also Bellew is the mandatory for Stevensons title now!
If Stevenson does a number on Bellew, as he should do really, then it hypes up the Froch fight a bit more. They could do a double header with Froch fighting say Martin Murray. Froch reckons he has 2-3 years left in the sport, so Ward can keep for the finale.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

polecateddy wrote:
columbo wrote:
Butterbean wrote:Thats a fight to make next. Let stevenson and froch go at it. Looks like stevenson has a pretty good depth to his punch.
I dont think Eddie Hearn will want any part of Stevenson for Froch. You have to remember that Stevenson was the mandatory for the IBF strap when that was the sole belt that Froch was holding. Hearn didnt want any part of it then! Froch himself would be willing to fight him I think as Froch will fight anyone but Hearn would stop it from happening I think. Also Bellew is the mandatory for Stevensons title now!
If Stevenson does a number on Bellew, as he should do really, then it hypes up the Froch fight a bit more. They could do a double header with Froch fighting say Martin Murray. Froch reckons he has 2-3 years left in the sport, so Ward can keep for the finale.
Yeah but who is Hearn more likely to put Froch in with ... a relative unknown in stevenson or put froch in with Groves in a big money domestic fight? Also he promotes Groves aswell so it makes sense.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by polecateddy »

Degale's formline has dramatically improved now his leg is healed and he's hitting with real power again.
dajuggernaut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by dajuggernaut »

Froch has been avoiding Stevenson.
dajuggernaut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43

Re: Dawson/Stevenson and Undercard RBR.

Post by dajuggernaut »

polecateddy wrote:
Butterbean wrote:Thats a fight to make next. Let stevenson and froch go at it. Looks like stevenson has a pretty good depth to his punch.
Lets hope Ward stays out of the picture, his style makes Sven Ottke look entertaining!
Which fights of Ward have you found to be boring?
Post Reply