Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

kingmo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 37
Joined: 09 Apr 2006, 14:56

Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by kingmo »

Interview with Fury, Hennessy and Booth..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQfl57ryjcA#!
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by The Insider »

You gotta love the furious one. Never a dull interview.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by lefty »

The Insider wrote:You gotta love the furious one. Never a dull interview.
He chats some complete shit but he is entertaining.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17143
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Anyone who thinks the fight is a done deal, is a bit off the mark.
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by The Insider »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Anyone who thinks the fight is a done deal, is a bit off the mark.
It's a done deal. I'm off to Marks in a bit.......
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13498
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by jameswilson »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Anyone who thinks the fight is a done deal, is a bit off the mark.
From what they say it hasn't even been discussed at the negotiation table.

No doubt that Haye and Fury want it. I just have that nagging feeling given Fury's history that the promoters will find a way to not make this fight.
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by jessi »

Biggest fight in the world ? Do me a favor ! Biggest mismatch more like. Fury wont last 180 seconds
Yapper1901
Super Middleweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 Mar 2013, 19:03

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by Yapper1901 »

See what I got from the interview is they have been at table for a while and deal will be announced very soon. It was just Kugan was asking wrong questions booth practically said as much. I mean I love Ifilm stuff but if I had been in that situation there would have been so many questions I would have asked booth was dying to spill the beans. Never seen it before but I think the interview showed they all like Kugan In boxing world but he will never be taken serious as he gets in good situations but never asked the questions that's matter they look at him in the boxing world as a bit of a joke.

It's a shame really as he has more access than any other reporter I have seen so could ask some great questions if he spent less time trying to be everyone friend. I think that's why he got pissed at end of interview as Tyson was basically saying he is thought of as a joke
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23186
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by mickey1975 »

jameswilson wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Anyone who thinks the fight is a done deal, is a bit off the mark.
From what they say it hasn't even been discussed at the negotiation table.

No doubt that Haye and Fury want it. I just have that nagging feeling given Fury's history that the promoters will find a way to not make this fight.
Haye and Booth always play it cool. The way I see it, it's nearly done.
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1956
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by liamlion »

Yapper1901 wrote:See what I got from the interview is they have been at table for a while and deal will be announced very soon. It was just Kugan was asking wrong questions booth practically said as much. I mean I love Ifilm stuff but if I had been in that situation there would have been so many questions I would have asked booth was dying to spill the beans. Never seen it before but I think the interview showed they all like Kugan In boxing world but he will never be taken serious as he gets in good situations but never asked the questions that's matter they look at him in the boxing world as a bit of a joke.

It's a shame really as he has more access than any other reporter I have seen so could ask some great questions if he spent less time trying to be everyone friend. I think that's why he got pissed at end of interview as Tyson was basically saying he is thought of as a joke
I think what I took from that interview was how arrogant and conceited Adam Booth seems.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17143
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by keithmoonhangover »

mickey1975 wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Anyone who thinks the fight is a done deal, is a bit off the mark.
From what they say it hasn't even been discussed at the negotiation table.

No doubt that Haye and Fury want it. I just have that nagging feeling given Fury's history that the promoters will find a way to not make this fight.
Haye and Booth always play it cool. The way I see it, it's nearly done.
Fury will want 50%, then they need to find a way to pacify Channel 5.
rm1
Middleweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 02 Feb 2013, 11:11

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by rm1 »

Yapper1901 wrote:See what I got from the interview is they have been at table for a while and deal will be announced very soon. It was just Kugan was asking wrong questions booth practically said as much. I mean I love Ifilm stuff but if I had been in that situation there would have been so many questions I would have asked booth was dying to spill the beans. Never seen it before but I think the interview showed they all like Kugan In boxing world but he will never be taken serious as he gets in good situations but never asked the questions that's matter they look at him in the boxing world as a bit of a joke.

It's a shame really as he has more access than any other reporter I have seen so could ask some great questions if he spent less time trying to be everyone friend. I think that's why he got pissed at end of interview as Tyson was basically saying he is thought of as a joke
Truth is Kugan's pretty thick although I love what Ifilm London is trying to do there is no substitute for brains.
Yapper1901
Super Middleweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 Mar 2013, 19:03

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by Yapper1901 »

liamlion wrote:
Yapper1901 wrote:See what I got from the interview is they have been at table for a while and deal will be announced very soon. It was just Kugan was asking wrong questions booth practically said as much. I mean I love Ifilm stuff but if I had been in that situation there would have been so many questions I would have asked booth was dying to spill the beans. Never seen it before but I think the interview showed they all like Kugan In boxing world but he will never be taken serious as he gets in good situations but never asked the questions that's matter they look at him in the boxing world as a bit of a joke.

It's a shame really as he has more access than any other reporter I have seen so could ask some great questions if he spent less time trying to be everyone friend. I think that's why he got pissed at end of interview as Tyson was basically saying he is thought of as a joke
I think what I took from that interview was how arrogant and conceited Adam Booth seems.
Not sure it's conceited when he's trying to help him. I think booths point is my time is precious why waste it answering crappy questions. I think if he comes up with a decent interview questions booth would be receptive I mean If you look at a lot of interviews from Ifilm the decent questions only come from James. Kugans too interested in showing he is on the inside with Hearn but what Kugan doesn't realise is that is what hurts him in the interviews as he too busy trying to remember what Hearn has told him not to repeat.

It's a shame really as James is obviously the better interviewer (content wise) but he doesn't get the big interviews as kugan steals the interview and James is left behind the camera.

Shame really as if Kugan spent less time worrying about his friendships and kissing ass and more time thinking what questions the fans would like to ask we might actually get to learn something.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23186
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by mickey1975 »

Keith, Five don't even come into it.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17143
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by keithmoonhangover »

mickey1975 wrote:Keith, Five don't even come into it.
Oh come on, there must be a contract between 5 and Hennessey. There's no way Fury would be on there if 5 didn't have a contract of some kind. Legally, that would leave them wide open.

Are you saying there isn't a contract?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by lefty »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Keith, Five don't even come into it.
Oh come on, there must be a contract between 5 and Hennessey. There's no way Fury would be on there if 5 didn't have a contract of some kind. Legally, that would leave them wide open.

Are you saying there isn't a contract?
I have a feeling that they might be doing business on a fight by fight basis at the moment to be honest.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by whiskey »

Top work Kugan :D

I think by the time fight night comes around, we will have several hours of completely cringe worthy but highly entertaining material online !

I'm excited already.
followthecamel
Super Middleweight
Posts: 73
Joined: 15 Oct 2012, 16:51

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by followthecamel »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Keith, Five don't even come into it.
Oh come on, there must be a contract between 5 and Hennessey. There's no way Fury would be on there if 5 didn't have a contract of some kind. Legally, that would leave them wide open.

Are you saying there isn't a contract?
Keith is very familiar with the channel 5 boxing contract, aren't you Keith? You should be helping them organizing this fight.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17143
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by keithmoonhangover »

followthecamel wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Keith, Five don't even come into it.
Oh come on, there must be a contract between 5 and Hennessey. There's no way Fury would be on there if 5 didn't have a contract of some kind. Legally, that would leave them wide open.

Are you saying there isn't a contract?
Keith is very familiar with the channel 5 boxing contract, aren't you Keith? You should be helping them organizing this fight.
I just think they must have legally binding contract. If they don't, I'm wrong.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by leforge »

Are you saying there isn't a contract?[/quote]
Keith is very familiar with the channel 5 boxing contract, aren't you Keith? You should be helping them organizing this fight.[/quote]

I just think they must have legally binding contract. If they don't, I'm wrong.[/quote]
They fight where the most money is I doubt thats 5.
followthecamel
Super Middleweight
Posts: 73
Joined: 15 Oct 2012, 16:51

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by followthecamel »

When this fight fails to materialize channel 5 will be Fury's scapegoat. Classic Tyson Fury.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23186
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by mickey1975 »

followthecamel wrote:When this fight fails to materialize channel 5 will be Fury's scapegoat. Classic Tyson Fury.
It will materialise. It is nearly done, well informed posters told us weeks ago! This is not like Fwank saying Clev is after Hopkins. The date and arena are even on standby.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17143
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by keithmoonhangover »

leforge wrote:Are you saying there isn't a contract?
Keith is very familiar with the channel 5 boxing contract, aren't you Keith? You should be helping them organizing this fight.[/quote]

I just think they must have legally binding contract. If they don't, I'm wrong.[/quote]
They fight where the most money is I doubt thats 5.[/quote]

I know it'll end up on SKY mate, I just wondered about Fury contractual obligations.
Maxsplit
Cruiserweight
Posts: 364
Joined: 13 Jul 2011, 22:26

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by Maxsplit »

mickey1975 wrote:
followthecamel wrote:When this fight fails to materialize channel 5 will be Fury's scapegoat. Classic Tyson Fury.
It will materialise. It is nearly done, well informed posters told us weeks ago! This is not like Fwank saying Clev is after Hopkins. The date and arena are even on standby.
Of course it's done.

Why on earth would Adam Booth be at that card otherwise?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Ifilm interviews Fury, Hennessy and Booth

Post by lefty »

Maxsplit wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
followthecamel wrote:When this fight fails to materialize channel 5 will be Fury's scapegoat. Classic Tyson Fury.
It will materialise. It is nearly done, well informed posters told us weeks ago! This is not like Fwank saying Clev is after Hopkins. The date and arena are even on standby.
Of course it's done.

Why on earth would Adam Booth be at that card otherwise?
Looking to make the fight? Why would he bother to turn up to that card if its already been made?
Post Reply