Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post Reply
danfoster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 651
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 05:07

Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by danfoster »

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/20 ... ugs-banned

Personally i think it's a disaster for the credibility of boxing that he's been able to negotiate his way back so soon.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by polecateddy »

danfoster wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/20 ... ugs-banned

Personally i think it's a disaster for the credibility of boxing that he's been able to negotiate his way back so soon.
I predict a couple of ho-hum 6 round decisions against Latvian journeymen, and another early loss to a half-decent domestic fighter, followed by retirement.
rm1
Middleweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 02 Feb 2013, 11:11

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by rm1 »

In the light of this dillian Whyte looks very hard done by -I hope he returns soon too and i hope all the british heavyweights ranked 4-15 start fighting each other as there could be some good tussles and you could get some excitement back into the scene for the area, English and british titles.
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by The Law »

The problem in Olubamiwo's case is that he has not offered up a Mr Big, but a 5ft 7in super-featherweight with a 11-12 win/loss record.
They need to check their facts before they type up an article. That record belongs to Craig Windsor Sr and not Craig Windsor Jr :wink:
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by smoggy7188 »

"has a degree in pharmaceutical chemistry – which he has certainly put to good use."

Good line. This whole episode seems very bizarre.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by Chambers2 »

Having 3 years knocked off your ban just for enlightening the board to one 11-12 fighter taking steroids seems extremely generous to me....... fair enough if he'd brought down a group of steroid users in boxing. He's claiming to know a lot more than he's letting on regarding other boxers taking steroids, but befriending a stranger on facebook and stitching them up seems to get him a 3 year reduction......... seems a bit farcical to me
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by Coco »

It is ironic that one cheat was grassed upon by another cheat!
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by The Law »

Chambers2 wrote:Having 3 years knocked off your ban just for enlightening the board to one 11-12 fighter taking steroids seems extremely generous to me....... fair enough if he'd brought down a group of steroid users in boxing. He's claiming to know a lot more than he's letting on regarding other boxers taking steroids, but befriending a stranger on facebook and stitching them up seems to get him a 3 year reduction......... seems a bit farcical to me
Craig Windsor Jr's record is not 11-12, as I stated above.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by palooka »

Coco wrote:It is ironic that one cheat was grassed upon by another cheat!
It's not ironic it is what happens every day of the week.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by m1kee50 »

Larrys bout cancelled apparently
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Big Larry return - good piece in Guardian

Post by Chambers2 »

The Law wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:Having 3 years knocked off your ban just for enlightening the board to one 11-12 fighter taking steroids seems extremely generous to me....... fair enough if he'd brought down a group of steroid users in boxing. He's claiming to know a lot more than he's letting on regarding other boxers taking steroids, but befriending a stranger on facebook and stitching them up seems to get him a 3 year reduction......... seems a bit farcical to me
Craig Windsor Jr's record is not 11-12, as I stated above.
Point taken Law, but the point of my post is not altered by the fact he has a 9-2 record rather than 11-12.

Going on Larrys recent exploits, it seems to me that if one of our top boxers tested positive for taking steroids he could get his ban reduced by 75% by informing the authorities that a novice or unknown boxer has been taking steroids. I'm sure there'd be plenty queueing up for a drugs ban if the price was right
Post Reply