Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

For RBR threads only
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Rover »

keithmoonhangover wrote:1-0 Banks
Same.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Rover »

columbo wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:1-0 Banks
Im not sure either of them deserved it haha
Yeah, close one.
Goliath
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 187
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 16:59

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Goliath »

SouthpawStephen wrote:
Goliath wrote:
SouthpawStephen wrote:Well, maybe Sakio shouldn't be a bitch then. 8)

Sakio just taxed that ass. Marco Antonio Periban is a hater.

8)
Taxed?
Marco Antonio Periban is a punk...lol. He lost to a better man and then threatened that man on live TV...you cant defend that.


:lol:
Last edited by Goliath on 22 Jun 2013, 22:34, edited 1 time in total.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17241
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Baby Face Finster »

Mitchell is going to get KO'd again.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16758
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Last round coming up.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by gilgamesh »

Here we go again. Mitchell on queer street at the end of that round.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

I think Mitchell got distracted by the brawl in the crowd and then got badly rocked
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Rover »

SouthpawStephen wrote:
columbo wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:1-0 Banks
Im not sure either of them deserved it haha
Boooooooooo :wink:
:lol:
They aren't booing now.
Goliath
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 187
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 16:59

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Goliath »

Banks UD
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

Mitchell is still on queer street
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by sucracristo »

the mitchell kd of banks in 2 was a push.
mitchell looked like he was out on his feet in 3rd
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4478
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by dookus »

Banks beats Mitchell up the second half of round 3 and mitchell's still hurt in rd 4
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Rover »

columbo wrote:I can understand why Mitchell is being cagey. He doesnt want to rush in and get chinned again.
Yeah, but Banks has more skill.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

Goliath wrote:Banks UD
How do you see that happening?! I cant see mitchell surviving the fight! :lol:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

Rover wrote:
columbo wrote:I can understand why Mitchell is being cagey. He doesnt want to rush in and get chinned again.
Yeah, but Banks has more skill.
Yeah but if he rushed in he would get knocked out again aswell! He couldnt really do anything else! :lol:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

Banks is allowing Mitchell to recover :shame:
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Rover »

columbo wrote:Mitchell's technique is looking better to me. Before he looked all over the place.
I agree; he's improved.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by gilgamesh »

:OhYes: Love the drama, any second you expect somebody to get Knocked the f*ck out.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

I like Mitchell's trainer. Giving good advice.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Rover »

columbo wrote:I think Mitchell got distracted by the brawl in the crowd and then got badly rocked
Pathetic focus if true.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

columbo wrote:
Rover wrote:
columbo wrote:I can understand why Mitchell is being cagey. He doesnt want to rush in and get chinned again.
Yeah, but Banks has more skill.
Yeah but if he rushed in he would get knocked out again aswell! He couldnt really do anything else! :lol:
I think he is getting KOed whether he comes in or not.[/quote]

That's what i mean. He's fucked either way! :lol:
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Rover »

Baby Face Finster wrote:Mitchell is going to get KO'd again.
I thought so too; surprised he didn't.
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4478
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by dookus »

Banks' output is way down in the 5th and he's waiting too long to throw
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by Rover »

SouthpawStephen wrote:Mitchell's legs are fucked.
And fuckin huge!
:)
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.

Post by lefty »

Rover wrote:
Baby Face Finster wrote:Mitchell is going to get KO'd again.
I thought so too; surprised he didn't.
Banks has let him back into the fight! He could of taken him out at any time i think then!
Post Reply