I've been on board...Martinez needs to step to the plate. Only a few fights worth GGG's time at Middleweight. Martinez, Chavez Jr., Daniel Geale, maybe Pirog or Sturm just for the hell of it. Then he should go knocking out the Carl Froch's and the Andre Ward's of the world.Baby Face Finster wrote:Welcome aboard the G Train everyone. It took a while but you all have finally arrived. Please take a seat behind me and strap yourselves in. Choooo Chooooo!
Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
I'd take Ward confidently.gilgamesh wrote:I've been on board...Martinez needs to step to the plate. Only a few fights worth GGG's time at Middleweight. Martinez, Chavez Jr., Daniel Geale, maybe Pirog or Sturm just for the hell of it. Then he should go knocking out the Carl Froch's and the Andre Ward's of the world.Baby Face Finster wrote:Welcome aboard the G Train everyone. It took a while but you all have finally arrived. Please take a seat behind me and strap yourselves in. Choooo Chooooo!
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
By the time he moves up to that fight he will have proven himself the dominant Middleweight king, and Ward's time will be up.Rover wrote:I'd take Ward confidently.gilgamesh wrote:I've been on board...Martinez needs to step to the plate. Only a few fights worth GGG's time at Middleweight. Martinez, Chavez Jr., Daniel Geale, maybe Pirog or Sturm just for the hell of it. Then he should go knocking out the Carl Froch's and the Andre Ward's of the world.Baby Face Finster wrote:Welcome aboard the G Train everyone. It took a while but you all have finally arrived. Please take a seat behind me and strap yourselves in. Choooo Chooooo!
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Jim's had DV issues.DetroitHxC wrote:He didn't really say anything explicitly, he just implied that Showtime was kinda disgraceful for the way they used "bad stuff" like the sexual acts with some girl and domestic violence claims that Malignaggi and Broner were saying to promote that fight.columbo wrote:Why what did he say?SouthpawStephen wrote:Jim just took a huge stab at Showtime.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Ward's time won't be up for quite a while.
Ward UD Golovkin.
Ward UD Golovkin.
-
sucracristo
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1828
- Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
he might fight a little differently if he wasn't thinking about the record. maybe take a few more chances.DetroitHxC wrote: He has a lot more fans than people think. A lot of people that don't really care about boxing love Mayweather. I don't think one loss puts him on the backburner, that's ridiculous.
He obviously wouldn't be given the same status, but to suggest he goes right off the radar is just retarded.
a loss might make mayweather a more aggressive fighter
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Golovkin beat Dirrell in the amateurs who is also a very skilled boxer and very quick so I wouldnt write him off in that fight at all. Also Ward doesnt hit anywhere near hard enough to really bother Golovkin.Rover wrote:Ward's time won't be up for quite a while.
Ward UD Golovkin.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
I don't care about the amateurs, where Jorge Luis Gonzales beat Bowe and Lewis. Biggs also beat Lewis and Tyson. Just a few examples.columbo wrote:Golovkin beat Dirrell in the amateurs who is also a very skilled boxer and very quick so I wouldnt write him off in that fight at all. Also Ward doesnt hit anywhere near hard enough to really bother Golovkin.Rover wrote:Ward's time won't be up for quite a while.
Ward UD Golovkin.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
I would like to see that. Fan of both, but I think Froch would take a beating.BROZO wrote:when he grows into 168 a fight with Froch would be a great fight.
Basically, if Martinez isn't going to fight GGG, then the Geale/Barker winner is his only meaningful fight left at MW. I'd like to see the move up to SMW relatively soon because there really isn't much challenge at MW for Golovkin's style/power outside of what I mentioned.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
I don't care at all about the amateurs. We're in the pros, so talk to me about pro fights.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Yeah, HBO has sour grapes.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
When people talk about Floyd and Ward, how much are their amateur credentials discussed?
Not much.
Not much.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
GGG would KO Floyd and WardRover wrote:When people talk about Floyd and Ward, how much are their amateur credentials discussed?
Not much.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
I think he's one of the top middles.SouthpawStephen wrote:Well, he's dominated so far. You don't think he is something special?Rover wrote:I don't care at all about the amateurs. We're in the pros, so talk to me about pro fights.
Ward is something special. He's left no doubt he's the top dog in his division.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Doubtful, especially Ward.gilgamesh wrote:GGG would KO Floyd and WardRover wrote:When people talk about Floyd and Ward, how much are their amateur credentials discussed?
Not much.![]()
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Experience isn't an issue for GGG or Ward. If a fighter's had a ton of amateur fights fighting a guy who's had none (and they're both turning pro), that guy of course has more boxing experience.DetroitHxC wrote:Rover, if you talk to ANY old timer in boxing, they will ALWAYS favor the fighter with more amatuer experience.
I don't know where you've been, but it's constantly brought up.
It has no influence on their current ranking, but it definitely plays into analyzing a matchup. It ALL plays into it. You judge a fighter at their current condition.
But one's having been a good amateur doesn't mean he'll dominate as a pro.
And Floyd's and Ward's resume (when they're discussed) focuses on their pro work.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Ward won a Gold Medal in the ams. That's as successful as it gets.SouthpawStephen wrote:That's because neither have had the same am successs and experience as G. There is a reaon G is as successful as he is in the pros. It is because he has faced and beaten the best in teh Ams. He fights in the style he does because he understands the game. He isn't wreckless. He figures out what his opponents offer within the 1st round and so far, knows he can handle their power and uses effective footwork, precision, and power to win fights.Rover wrote:When people talk about Floyd and Ward, how much are their amateur credentials discussed?
Not much.
As knowledgable as you seem to be, Rover, I am surprised that you don't see the uniquness in GGG.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Only time will tell. He has at least 4 fights he should take before that one I think. Martinez, Chavez Jr., Geale and Carl Froch.Rover wrote:Doubtful, especially Ward.gilgamesh wrote:GGG would KO Floyd and WardRover wrote:When people talk about Floyd and Ward, how much are their amateur credentials discussed?
Not much.![]()
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Not when it comes to evaluating how they'll do in a fight. When people discuss Ward's status (P4P and all-time), his pro resume is the main focus.DetroitHxC wrote:They bring up Ward's Gold Medal all the time, and have talked about it with Floyd to a point of beating a dead horse.
When you watch a guy fight for years it gets old to keep on bringing up their amatuer experience, but I would bet BOTH nuts that it's been talked about extensively during pro fights of each of those fighters.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
He hasn't fought anything near Ward.SouthpawStephen wrote:Rover, rewatch tonight's fight and watch how GGG changes around a minute into the fight. He KNOWS. He has a better understanding of the game than almost anyone I have seen since I have been watching the sport. Ward is a different fighter. I am not saying G beats him. But Ward is about talent and game plan. G already has that info inside him. He finds out what he needs to in the first round and makes his decision at that point. He has a very precise jab and effective defense when utilized.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
I agree he's better than Broner. I remember Fantastic's saying Broner would put him in a coma (ridiculous).SouthpawStephen wrote:I'm not going to put Golovkin in the top 10 just yet, however, I do feel he is one of the best P4P fighters on the planet at this point. He should earn that position. But I have little to no doubt that he will. He is a very special fight. Much more so than Adrian Broner...by miles.
But when your best win is Macklin, not P4P top 10 yet.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
I doubt he'd demolish Froch, Kessler and even Bika.SouthpawStephen wrote:True, but I believe G would demolish teh same fighters Ward has. In more dominating fashion as well.Rover wrote:He hasn't fought anything near Ward.SouthpawStephen wrote:Rover, rewatch tonight's fight and watch how GGG changes around a minute into the fight. He KNOWS. He has a better understanding of the game than almost anyone I have seen since I have been watching the sport. Ward is a different fighter. I am not saying G beats him. But Ward is about talent and game plan. G already has that info inside him. He finds out what he needs to in the first round and makes his decision at that point. He has a very precise jab and effective defense when utilized.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
Not in handicapping how a fighter will do against another fighter.DetroitHxC wrote:I made it clear that it has no bearing on their ranking, but it's a factor in evaluating a fighter. Especially the more unknown a fighter is to the public. Like I said, you take them at their current condition.Rover wrote:Not when it comes to evaluating how they'll do in a fight. When people discuss Ward's status (P4P and all-time), his pro resume is the main focus.DetroitHxC wrote:They bring up Ward's Gold Medal all the time, and have talked about it with Floyd to a point of beating a dead horse.
When you watch a guy fight for years it gets old to keep on bringing up their amatuer experience, but I would bet BOTH nuts that it's been talked about extensively during pro fights of each of those fighters.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
I'd take Froch. And I'd also take Martinez (if he's healthy, which we don't know).SouthpawStephen wrote:I agree with you. Bu comon. Who would you say beats him anywhere around his weight....except for Ward?Rover wrote:I agree he's better than Broner. I remember Fantastic's saying Broner would put him in a coma (ridiculous).SouthpawStephen wrote:I'm not going to put Golovkin in the top 10 just yet, however, I do feel he is one of the best P4P fighters on the planet at this point. He should earn that position. But I have little to no doubt that he will. He is a very special fight. Much more so than Adrian Broner...by miles.
But when your best win is Macklin, not P4P top 10 yet.
Re: Golovkin vs Macklin Round by Round
I don't see him demolishing those guys. They aren't Macklin, especially Froch.SouthpawStephen wrote:Bika would be first given his style. Kessler definitely. And I would be fully confident in his ability to get inside on Froch and put him on his ass.Rover wrote:I doubt he'd demolish Froch, Kessler and even Bika.SouthpawStephen wrote: True, but I believe G would demolish teh same fighters Ward has. In more dominating fashion as well.