Johnny Nelson vote time
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Don't mind him as a pundit to be honest. Just not Ringside.
-
1 nut
- Heavyweight

Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
I'm tired of him , I just don't rate him at all
Don't like listening too him
Don't like listening too him
-
Matt Teague
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 322
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:19
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Jamie Moore, Ritchie Woodall, would be more suitable for sky, nelson is crap,
-
SexySouthPaw
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 195
- Joined: 27 May 2008, 15:46
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Nelson is the only one with any knowledge
Forget McCRory Woodall or Moore.Watt knows his stuff from the fighters perspective too
Forget McCRory Woodall or Moore.Watt knows his stuff from the fighters perspective too
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
How do you work out that Nelson is the only one with any knowledge?SexySouthPaw wrote:Nelson is the only one with any knowledge
Forget McCRory Woodall or Moore.Watt knows his stuff from the fighters perspective too
-
gazza8
- Heavyweight

Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
I thought they made an error by telling us Glen fancied Crolla, i felt a sence of his commentry, and his ridiculous 5 round scorecard margin, totaly biased!
-
1 nut
- Heavyweight

Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Nelson is terrible I'm sorry I can not believe anything else .
Boxing is timing and he was in the right place at the right time too get the job
P45 for johnny !
Boxing is timing and he was in the right place at the right time too get the job
P45 for johnny !
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Well you're called 1 nut so I guess it's no surprise to hear you talking bollocks.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
While I'm not a particular fan, the fact is that Nelson isn't even the worst on sky. Is Jame Moore better? Yes, but he's also better than the majority of pundits on all channels.
The combination of Lillis, Bunce, and Thompson on Friday night almost had me longing for Sky. The usp for BN was that it wasn't as a stuffy a format as skys, but the three of them talking on Friday would have bored the anus off a monkey.
The combination of Lillis, Bunce, and Thompson on Friday night almost had me longing for Sky. The usp for BN was that it wasn't as a stuffy a format as skys, but the three of them talking on Friday would have bored the anus off a monkey.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
The problem is and this is the same for most sports that they pick the talking heads based solely on the fact that they participated in the sport and won a title of some sort rather than knowing anything about it from an analytical point of view. They just spend the time spouting endless cliches and inane waffle, a man who's never had a professional bout but knows boxing inside out as an analyst would do a better job than most of them.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23187
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
I have thought that before. Some very good boxers don't follow the sport at all. I got the impression Joshua didn't even know who GGG was on Ringside and just winged it. Some are very good, though. Paul Smith for example is outstanding,banjo wrote:The problem is and this is the same for most sports that they pick the talking heads based solely on the fact that they participated in the sport and won a title of some sort rather than knowing anything about it from an analytical point of view. They just spend the time spouting endless cliches and inane waffle, a man who's never had a professional bout but knows boxing inside out as an analyst would do a better job than most of them.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Can't say I've noticed Smith but I quite like Jamie Moore and Jon Thaxton was good on ITV a few years ago too, most are out of there depth though and the viewers are fooled because it will say in a caption "Glenn McCrory - Former World Cruiserweight Champion" and makes people think "Oh he must know what he's on about" I've seen people on this forum and others who would do a better job.mickey1975 wrote:I have thought that before. Some very good boxers don't follow the sport at all. I got the impression Joshua didn't even know who GGG was on Ringside and just winged it. Some are very good, though. Paul Smith for example is outstanding,banjo wrote:The problem is and this is the same for most sports that they pick the talking heads based solely on the fact that they participated in the sport and won a title of some sort rather than knowing anything about it from an analytical point of view. They just spend the time spouting endless cliches and inane waffle, a man who's never had a professional bout but knows boxing inside out as an analyst would do a better job than most of them.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Yup, I agree. Paul Smith is very good as is Jim Watt. Nelson is also fine, to be truthful. I don't have an issue with him at all.mickey1975 wrote:I have thought that before. Some very good boxers don't follow the sport at all. I got the impression Joshua didn't even know who GGG was on Ringside and just winged it. Some are very good, though. Paul Smith for example is outstanding,
There plenty worse than him, both on BN and SKY.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
I like Johnny he is knowledgeable comes across well IMO.
The gloves off special he did recently with collins calzaghe eubank and co was well chaired yes he makes a few mistakes but he is better than Glenn .
I find Adam Smith far more annoying.
1 nut why did you call the thread vote time but not put a poll??
I think its because its a personality thing and you know that most people quite enjoy watching Johnny or are'nt that bothered by him.
The gloves off special he did recently with collins calzaghe eubank and co was well chaired yes he makes a few mistakes but he is better than Glenn .
I find Adam Smith far more annoying.
1 nut why did you call the thread vote time but not put a poll??
I think its because its a personality thing and you know that most people quite enjoy watching Johnny or are'nt that bothered by him.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
I like him; he is experienced and still watches the sport; he is a impressive figure and deserves his job.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Khan didn't even know who Martinez was last night, just that Macklin had fought an Argentinian.mickey1975 wrote:I have thought that before. Some very good boxers don't follow the sport at all. I got the impression Joshua didn't even know who GGG was on Ringside and just winged it. Some are very good, though. Paul Smith for example is outstanding,banjo wrote:The problem is and this is the same for most sports that they pick the talking heads based solely on the fact that they participated in the sport and won a title of some sort rather than knowing anything about it from an analytical point of view. They just spend the time spouting endless cliches and inane waffle, a man who's never had a professional bout but knows boxing inside out as an analyst would do a better job than most of them.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Stick Nigel Benn on there and Lennox Lewis.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
He knew who he was but couldn't find the name; happens to me all the time.expe wrote:Khan didn't even know who Martinez was last night, just that Macklin had fought an Argentinian.mickey1975 wrote:I have thought that before. Some very good boxers don't follow the sport at all. I got the impression Joshua didn't even know who GGG was on Ringside and just winged it. Some are very good, though. Paul Smith for example is outstanding,banjo wrote:The problem is and this is the same for most sports that they pick the talking heads based solely on the fact that they participated in the sport and won a title of some sort rather than knowing anything about it from an analytical point of view. They just spend the time spouting endless cliches and inane waffle, a man who's never had a professional bout but knows boxing inside out as an analyst would do a better job than most of them.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Come off it, he knew he was, the name just escaped him. I follow boxing religously but I bumped into one particular champion who is well known in my local town centre and while speaking to him, I kept calling him by the first name of another boxer with the same surname. I did it about five times.expe wrote:Khan didn't even know who Martinez was last night, just that Macklin had fought an Argentinian.mickey1975 wrote:I have thought that before. Some very good boxers don't follow the sport at all. I got the impression Joshua didn't even know who GGG was on Ringside and just winged it. Some are very good, though. Paul Smith for example is outstanding,banjo wrote:The problem is and this is the same for most sports that they pick the talking heads based solely on the fact that they participated in the sport and won a title of some sort rather than knowing anything about it from an analytical point of view. They just spend the time spouting endless cliches and inane waffle, a man who's never had a professional bout but knows boxing inside out as an analyst would do a better job than most of them.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Eddy,
Are you mental ?
Lennox lives in Miami ! Why the fornicate would he want a job on ringside with 80 mill in the bank ? As for suggesting Benn well I need a pint of what you're supping.
Are you mental ?
Lennox lives in Miami ! Why the fornicate would he want a job on ringside with 80 mill in the bank ? As for suggesting Benn well I need a pint of what you're supping.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Parson Cross wrote:Eddy,
Are you mental ?
Lennox lives in Miami ! Why the eff would he want a job on ringside with 80 mill in the bank ? As for suggesting Benn well I need a pint of what you're supping.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
Lewis is dull as fornicate and sounded pretty clueless when doing the HBO commentaryEddy wrote:Stick Nigel Benn on there and Lennox Lewis.
Re: Johnny Nelson vote time
I like Nelson on Saturday night when he can be himself, but agreed on Ringside - with auto cue - he's hard to watch.