Fury's ranked about 5th or 6th in the division.MarkMcBurney wrote:What has Tyson Fury really done to justify being labelled world class? The truth is we don't know how well he stands up to a genuine world class fighter because he hasn't faced one yet - except a former world class fighter from the division below him.
Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23189
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
His heart is his best asset. He is not very wealthy, either.palooka wrote:Fury is boxing and improving regularly; Fury is very powerful but is his heart in it? He is very wealthy and has been at the (near) pinnacle; when he got the chance to go for the crown he did not really grab it. I don't think Fury will win; Haye hits very hard but to disregard Furys' chance is silly.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
He meant Haye.
-
Teddy's Toupee
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
One other fact: Fury is tool.Roars Like Me wrote:2 other facts:
That's an IKEA sofa
White socks are always a bad thing
-
Teddy's Toupee
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Palooka meant Haye might not be in love with boxing anymore and is very wealthy, but put Fury's name by mistake (I think).mickey1975 wrote:His heart is his best asset. He is not very wealthy, either.palooka wrote:Fury is boxing and improving regularly; Fury is very powerful but is his heart in it? He is very wealthy and has been at the (near) pinnacle; when he got the chance to go for the crown he did not really grab it. I don't think Fury will win; Haye hits very hard but to disregard Furys' chance is silly.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
The worst mistake ever? I meant to say, 'Haye is very powerful etc etc'.palooka wrote:Fury is boxing and improving regularly; Fury is very powerful but is his heart in it? He is very wealthy and has been at the (near) pinnacle; when he got the chance to go for the crown he did not really grab it. I don't think Fury will win; Haye hits very hard but to disregard Furys' chance is silly.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Teddy's Toupee wrote:Palooka meant Haye might not be in love with boxing anymore and is very wealthy, but put Fury's name by mistake (I think).mickey1975 wrote:His heart is his best asset. He is not very wealthy, either.palooka wrote:Fury is boxing and improving regularly; Fury is very powerful but is his heart in it? He is very wealthy and has been at the (near) pinnacle; when he got the chance to go for the crown he did not really grab it. I don't think Fury will win; Haye hits very hard but to disregard Furys' chance is silly.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Beat enough mid-level fighters and you too could get ranked that highly. That means nothing. Not quite the same as Froch being ranked 2 after his run of fights is it?Horse wrote:Fury's ranked about 5th or 6th in the division.MarkMcBurney wrote:What has Tyson Fury really done to justify being labelled world class? The truth is we don't know how well he stands up to a genuine world class fighter because he hasn't faced one yet - except a former world class fighter from the division below him.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
MarkMcBurney wrote:Beat enough mid-level fighters and you too could get ranked that highly. That means nothing. Not quite the same as Froch being ranked 2 after his run of fights is it?Horse wrote:Fury's ranked about 5th or 6th in the division.MarkMcBurney wrote:What has Tyson Fury really done to justify being labelled world class? The truth is we don't know how well he stands up to a genuine world class fighter because he hasn't faced one yet - except a former world class fighter from the division below him.
I can see what you mean Mark but Ward has to be number 1 in the division and that's because he's beaten everyone he's boxed; in such a competitive division being the accepted number 2 is something to be proud of; I don't think Ward has lost in 15 years amateur and pro; including Olympic Gold - no shame being second best to him.
(Missed the point a bit there didn't I
Last edited by palooka on 30 Jun 2013, 13:26, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
And if I beat Mayweather and Marquez I can be P4P No. 1. What is your point?MarkMcBurney wrote:Beat enough mid-level fighters and you too could get ranked that highly.
Froch is a top P4P fighter. Fury not being as good as him at the moment doesn't mean he isn't a world class fighter.MarkMcBurney wrote:That means nothing. Not quite the same as Froch being ranked 2 after his run of fights is it?
Fury has beaten Chisora, Cunningham and Johnson. Which heavyweights have done more than that in recent years?
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Only goes to show you what it takes to be considered "world class" these days.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Well connected people, especially those with a gob for the media have always got in front of the queue in every type of sport and in boxing smoke and mirrors counts more than results when it comes to making a living.Cap wrote:Only goes to show you what it takes to be considered "world class" these days.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Fury has got results.palooka wrote:Well connected people, especially those with a gob for the media have always got in front of the queue in every type of sport and in boxing smoke and mirrors counts more than results when it comes to making a living.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Yes he has horse; I was replying to a Cap post.Horse wrote:Fury has got results.palooka wrote:Well connected people, especially those with a gob for the media have always got in front of the queue in every type of sport and in boxing smoke and mirrors counts more than results when it comes to making a living.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
And your post seemed to be suggesting that Fury is getting opportunities because of his mouth rather than his proven ability.palooka wrote:Yes he has horse; I was replying to a Cap post.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
There's the bouts he has won and his mouth and the performances of others that have all combined to elevate him. If he weren't so vocal and personable then his performances would not have him shooting for a PPV bout next up. If he didn't get so much attention out of the ring then he'd be like any one of the other good heavyweight contenders.Horse wrote:And your post seemed to be suggesting that Fury is getting opportunities because of his mouth rather than his proven ability.palooka wrote:Yes he has horse; I was replying to a Cap post.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Which world class fighters has Fury beaten then?Horse wrote:And if I beat Mayweather and Marquez I can be P4P No. 1. What is your point?MarkMcBurney wrote:Beat enough mid-level fighters and you too could get ranked that highly.
Froch is a top P4P fighter. Fury not being as good as him at the moment doesn't mean he isn't a world class fighter.MarkMcBurney wrote:That means nothing. Not quite the same as Froch being ranked 2 after his run of fights is it?
Fury has beaten Chisora, Cunningham and Johnson. Which heavyweights have done more than that in recent years?
Cunningham may have been a world class cruiser but is/was never world level at HW as long as he's got a hole in his arse.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Cunningham beat Adamek on most people's cards and Adamek was/is a top 10 ranked heavyweight. Fury knocked him out.MarkMcBurney wrote:Which world class fighters has Fury beaten then?
Cunningham may have been a world class cruiser but is/was never world level at HW as long as he's got a hole in his arse.
Fury beat Chisora more clearly than Vitali or Helenius did. Chisora is still a top 10/15 heavyweight.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Such a shame 'most people's cards' didn't match the three who mattered. Shoulda woulda coulda.Horse wrote:Cunningham beat Adamek on most people's cards and Adamek was/is a top 10 ranked heavyweight. Fury knocked him out.MarkMcBurney wrote:Which world class fighters has Fury beaten then?
Cunningham may have been a world class cruiser but is/was never world level at HW as long as he's got a hole in his arse.
Fury beat Chisora more clearly than Vitali or Helenius did. Chisora is still a top 10/15 heavyweight.
And Adamek is hardly a massive heavyweight is he...another world class cruiser.
And if you're using Chisora as a point of reference then clearly Haye is a better fighter after what he did to a far fitter and more motivated Del Boy...?
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
I suppose you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao then?MarkMcBurney wrote:Such a shame 'most people's cards' didn't match the three who mattered. Shoulda woulda coulda.
He's not a top 10 heavyweight then?MarkMcBurney wrote:And Adamek is hardly a massive heavyweight is he...another world class cruiser.
Haye has more power than Fury, I don't deny that. That doesn't mean he will beat Fury when they meet.MarkMcBurney wrote:And if you're using Chisora as a point of reference then clearly Haye is a better fighter after what he did to a far fitter and more motivated Del Boy...?
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
1. Yep, I did. Narrow but I did. Couldn't really argue with a couple of point swing either way though, but unless you value the thoughts of Jim Watt it certainly wasn't the 'robbery' that was laughably portrayed in the media. Pacquiao landed very little on anything other than Bradley's gloves or arms that night.Horse wrote:I suppose you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao then?MarkMcBurney wrote:Such a shame 'most people's cards' didn't match the three who mattered. Shoulda woulda coulda.
He's not a top 10 heavyweight then?MarkMcBurney wrote:And Adamek is hardly a massive heavyweight is he...another world class cruiser.
Haye has more power than Fury, I don't deny that. That doesn't mean he will beat Fury when they meet.MarkMcBurney wrote:And if you're using Chisora as a point of reference then clearly Haye is a better fighter after what he did to a far fitter and more motivated Del Boy...?
2. Yup. But that doesn't make him world class, it means that outside of the Klitschko family the heavyweight division is awful.
3. But seemingly on no evidence whatsoever Fury will 'destroy' someone so much more powerful and faster than him. You really are a strange individual.
-
Teddy's Toupee
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
How do you you manage to type, Horse, whilst simultaneously licking Fury's arse?
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
When Fury beats Haye with ease, the whole of BoxRec will be forced to bow before the superior boxing knowledge of Horse.Teddy's Toupee wrote:How do you you manage to type, Horse, whilst simultaneously licking Fury's arse?
I will be the King of BoxRec and I will rule with an iron fist.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
Alot of people ith sight problems may have scored the fight to valuev who did land a punch but that doesnt mean he nearly lost the fight; not one judge scored it to valuev.Horse wrote:A lot of people scored the fight to Valuev.Finn wrote:nearly lost to valuev? 116-112, 114-114, 116-112.
You don't understand why I think a world class heavyweight "stands a chance" against the almighty David Haye? Really?Finn wrote:I honestly can understand why you think Fury stands a chance he's too easily tagged.
Do you consider fury world class he hasnt faced a dangerous opponent and won convincingly yet.
Re: Fury on the Haye fight , the facts !
It's nothing to do with sight problems, it's to do with people favouring Valuev's workrate over Haye's slight advantage in punch accuracy.Finn wrote:Alot of people ith sight problems may have scored the fight to valuev who did land a punch but that doesnt mean he nearly lost the fight; not one judge scored it to valuev.
He beat Chisora, Cunningham and Johnson convincingly.Finn wrote:Do you consider fury world class he hasnt faced a dangerous opponent and won convincingly yet.