Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?

Post Reply
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9183
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?

Post by Controversial »

I've been thinking about how some big punchers keep their power when they moved through the weight divisions, for example Hearns and Pacquiao, yet other big punchers have moved up in weight and their punch doesn't have the same impact anymore, for example Roy Jones and similarly Benn. Is it a case of the opponents got better (or worse)?

What do you reckon?
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9183
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?

Post by Controversial »

Wow no takers? Thought it was an interesting discussion.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?

Post by Ezzard »

Nobody's punch has the same impact. For some it just diminishes far less than for others.

I guess there's force, accuracy, timing... Hearns had an accurate punch that he could land unexpectedly. That didn't change as he went up the divisions...
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?

Post by bollox »

I was about to say that Hearns didn't carry all his power to the higher divisions but then remembered Dennis Andries bouncing all over the canvas at 175 :box:

Tall sinewy punchers seem to carry their power with them more than short stocky types
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?

Post by Ezzard »

Generally speaking punchers are at the biggest disadvantage when they move up the divisions.
Post Reply