I've been thinking about how some big punchers keep their power when they moved through the weight divisions, for example Hearns and Pacquiao, yet other big punchers have moved up in weight and their punch doesn't have the same impact anymore, for example Roy Jones and similarly Benn. Is it a case of the opponents got better (or worse)?
What do you reckon?
Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9183
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9183
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
Re: Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?
Wow no takers? Thought it was an interesting discussion.
Re: Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?
Nobody's punch has the same impact. For some it just diminishes far less than for others.
I guess there's force, accuracy, timing... Hearns had an accurate punch that he could land unexpectedly. That didn't change as he went up the divisions...
I guess there's force, accuracy, timing... Hearns had an accurate punch that he could land unexpectedly. That didn't change as he went up the divisions...
Re: Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?
I was about to say that Hearns didn't carry all his power to the higher divisions but then remembered Dennis Andries bouncing all over the canvas at 175
Tall sinewy punchers seem to carry their power with them more than short stocky types
Tall sinewy punchers seem to carry their power with them more than short stocky types
Re: Carrying your power through the weights, why not always?
Generally speaking punchers are at the biggest disadvantage when they move up the divisions.