Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6721
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by Kilburn »

loaded_gloves wrote:No chin, no stamina, no need to discuss Price further. He is now irrelevant.

Tyson Fury will get whacked by David Haye soon, lose in a similar ignominious manner, probably involving a funky chicken dance then crying afterwards, and we can all move back to smaller athletic heavyweights.
:lol:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23186
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by mickey1975 »

loaded_gloves wrote:No chin, no stamina, no need to discuss Price further. He is now irrelevant.

Tyson Fury will get whacked by David Haye soon, lose in a similar ignominious manner, probably involving a funky chicken dance then crying afterwards, and we can all move back to smaller athletic heavyweights.
Not true. The smaller heavies have no chance in the new age. Deal with it.
Karl Jade
Cruiserweight
Posts: 734
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 16:40

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by Karl Jade »

Why have Povetkin and Haye held belts in the last 2 years then?
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by Neil Gee »

Fury must be kicking himself for not taking the Price fight when he had the chance. Price is obviously not good enough at world level and Fury could have got all the credit for proving that. Now beating Price would prove nothing. What a missed chance.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4587
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by JC »

Neil Gee wrote:Fury must be kicking himself for not taking the Price fight when he had the chance. Price is obviously not good enough at world level and Fury could have got all the credit for proving that. Now beating Price would prove nothing. What a missed chance.
But don't forget when Price was Tyson's mandatory and the fight was being talked about it was before Fury had switched trainers to Peter Fury. At that time he was not in the best of shape and was eating his fair share of right hand against the likes of Pajkic and Firtha. It's impossible to say what would have happened if they had fought then, Fury could well have come unstuck first. Fury's management have made the right decisions so far in terms of matchmaking imo.
DIRT SUGAR
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1200
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by DIRT SUGAR »

Saw Price in some of his earlier fights and he was good going forward but there seemed to be an air of vulnerability about him. Plus for such a big bloke was surprised how spindly his legs were. Shame, seems a decent guy. Also, he's been matched tough all of a sudden after a really low key start to his career. Thompson's not the best but he's no mug and has a lot of experience. But two defeats against a guy who was totally dominated by Klitschko pretty much shows Price is not ready for this level.. and I don't think he ever will be. Going to take a hell of a lot to build him back up now. While Fury's not the best in the world, he's been matched and been through some shaky periods in fights and came back. Price never had to and when the time came he didn't have it battle through the test when it came.
jtourettes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 826
Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 07:24

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by jtourettes »

DIRT SUGAR wrote:Saw Price in some of his earlier fights and he was good going forward but there seemed to be an air of vulnerability about him. Plus for such a big bloke was surprised how spindly his legs were. Shame, seems a decent guy. Also, he's been matched tough all of a sudden after a really low key start to his career. Thompson's not the best but he's no mug and has a lot of experience. But two defeats against a guy who was totally dominated by Klitschko pretty much shows Price is not ready for this level.. and I don't think he ever will be. Going to take a hell of a lot to build him back up now. While Fury's not the best in the world, he's been matched and been through some shaky periods in fights and came back. Price never had to and when the time came he didn't have it battle through the test when it came.
Totally dominated by Klitschko? Not in the first fight.
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4500
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by dookus »

jtourettes wrote:
DIRT SUGAR wrote:Saw Price in some of his earlier fights and he was good going forward but there seemed to be an air of vulnerability about him. Plus for such a big bloke was surprised how spindly his legs were. Shame, seems a decent guy. Also, he's been matched tough all of a sudden after a really low key start to his career. Thompson's not the best but he's no mug and has a lot of experience. But two defeats against a guy who was totally dominated by Klitschko pretty much shows Price is not ready for this level.. and I don't think he ever will be. Going to take a hell of a lot to build him back up now. While Fury's not the best in the world, he's been matched and been through some shaky periods in fights and came back. Price never had to and when the time came he didn't have it battle through the test when it came.
Totally dominated by Klitschko? Not in the first fight.
Absolutely, he actually outlanded Klitschko through 11 rounds before being stopped.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by palooka »

Neil Gee wrote:Fury must be kicking himself for not taking the Price fight when he had the chance. Price is obviously not good enough at world level and Fury could have got all the credit for proving that. Now beating Price would prove nothing. What a missed chance.
Yeah, he must be really down having a bout with Haye coming up in September; if he beats haye then he's at the very top to shout for a shot; if he loses he can have a go with Price. I bet he's in bits.
DIRT SUGAR
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1200
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48

Re: Price vs Thompson this weekend.

Post by DIRT SUGAR »

dookus wrote:
jtourettes wrote:
DIRT SUGAR wrote:Saw Price in some of his earlier fights and he was good going forward but there seemed to be an air of vulnerability about him. Plus for such a big bloke was surprised how spindly his legs were. Shame, seems a decent guy. Also, he's been matched tough all of a sudden after a really low key start to his career. Thompson's not the best but he's no mug and has a lot of experience. But two defeats against a guy who was totally dominated by Klitschko pretty much shows Price is not ready for this level.. and I don't think he ever will be. Going to take a hell of a lot to build him back up now. While Fury's not the best in the world, he's been matched and been through some shaky periods in fights and came back. Price never had to and when the time came he didn't have it battle through the test when it came.
Totally dominated by Klitschko? Not in the first fight.
Absolutely, he actually outlanded Klitschko through 11 rounds before being stopped.
Yeah I meant in the last fight and still if you're losing fights to Tony Thompson back-to-back by KO, you're not on your way to beating a Klitschko are you? Like I said saw a couple of early Price fights and just wasn't that impressed to be honest.
Post Reply