Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by Freedom2013 »

This fight was supposed to be next Thursday, but Richard Towers is not permitted to enter Australia because of past legal problems.

Browne says he's willing to fight him in the UK, so it may be rescheduled.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13395
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by jameswilson »

At the current rate this fight will happen in August 2032.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Browne v Towers
Pacquioa v Mayweather
and
Holyfield v Tyson III

ALL on the same card...2020!
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by expe »

A bit of thought and a couple of episodes of nothing to declare would have told them that Towers might have had problems getting into Australia, so how did they only find out 5 days before?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13395
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by jameswilson »

It's quite nice that we have got through 4 replies on a Richard Towers thread where nobody has called him a 'big boofhead.'
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by rob h »

Don't get why this is "news" only seen towers once and he's shite.
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by rob h »

Sorry, he boxed shite.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by TheCobra »

Yeh there seems to be a little cult following for Towers based on I don't know what, maybe cos he's massive and called Towers and went to prison once. Interesting back story, shame about him as a fighter though!! Can't remember what fight they showed of him on SKy, but it was an embarassingly bad affair.
rm1
Middleweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 02 Feb 2013, 11:11

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by rm1 »

Unbelieveable they should have found this out the first time the fight was on. Towers is not very good and getting old he needs to fight or he will forget waht little ring craft he had.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by rhino222 »

Whats the problem? Australia is full of criminals! Most ot their ancestors rowed there.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by whiskey »

I was actually interested in this fight.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

TheCobra wrote:Yeh there seems to be a little cult following for Towers based on I don't know what, maybe cos he's massive and called Towers and went to prison once. Interesting back story, shame about him as a fighter though!! Can't remember what fight they showed of him on SKy, but it was an embarassingly bad affair.
The fight against the Frenchman Gregory Tony. Pretty shambolic he was on the verge of being stopped.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by Brute »

rhino222 wrote:Whats the problem? Australia is full of criminals! Most ot their ancestors rowed there.
The British government stopped transportation in the 1840s. People in England were getting themselves locked up to get here.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by lefty »

Like Expe said, how the hell has it taken this long for someone to realise that Towers might have trouble getting into Australia based on the fact that he served 10 odd years or whatever it was! Are the people who run these promotional companies idiots because at times it seems like it.
rm1
Middleweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 02 Feb 2013, 11:11

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by rm1 »

columbo wrote:Like Expe said, how the hell has it taken this long for someone to realise that Towers might have trouble getting into Australia based on the fact that he served 10 odd years or whatever it was! Are the people who run these promotional companies idiots because at times it seems like it.
I am beginning to think they are.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by Parson Cross »

No excuses it should have been sorted. Same Co dealing with Martin Murray. Hatton Promos need a decent lawyer !!
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by lefty »

Parson Cross wrote:No excuses it should have been sorted. Same Co dealing with Martin Murray. Hatton Promos need a decent lawyer !!
You say about a decent lawyer but that's common sense!
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by Andrew »

You would have thought someone woul dsee if Towers had VISA issues a long time ago considering he was in prision for a bit.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23033
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by mickey1975 »

Parson Cross wrote:No excuses it should have been sorted. Same Co dealing with Martin Murray. Hatton Promos need a decent lawyer !!
They had one as CEO not too long ago.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by lefty »

Naandrew wrote:You would have thought someone woul dsee if Towers had VISA issues a long time ago considering he was in prision for a bit.
It wasnt just a little while, it was like 10 years or something he was inside for a violent robbery where someone was tortured if I remember correctly! It's common sense that a country with one of the strictest immigration laws in the world is unlikely to let you in their country if you've committed a serious offence for which you served serious prison time and there was violence involved.
Fortynineandout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by Fortynineandout »

Schoolboy error by the promotion team!
tilt
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 148
Joined: 11 Aug 2009, 22:25

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by tilt »

good on aus for not letting a thug like him in. hes shite anyway
Deano s
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 243
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 07:24

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by Deano s »

the visa excuse is total crap they never wanted this fight towers hasn't fought in over a year why would you stay that inactive ? sureley he should have been out fighting even if it was just a journeyman towers bollox went end of story
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by palooka »

expe wrote:A bit of thought and a couple of episodes of nothing to declare would have told them that Towers might have had problems getting into Australia, so how did they only find out 5 days before?
You can't take a fuckin tea bag in! (Mind, seeing what some of the Chinese try to take - hells bells :shame: )
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4483
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Richard Towers-Lucas Browne is off

Post by dookus »

The potential for visa issues never crossed their minds despite his pretty well-known past? Fucking boofhead promoters
Locked