Chisora vs Scott

Chisora vs Scott

Poll ended at 19 Jul 2013, 19:03

Chisora KO
16
18%
Chisora Poits
26
29%
Dras
1
1%
Scott KO
4
4%
Scott Points
42
47%
 
Total votes: 89

dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1794
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by dbf »

Just watched the weigh in vid - nothing too dramatic

http://youtu.be/19ZXPgSXf2E
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by jameswilson »

Haha. Where's that berk saying Chisora was gonna be 16 stone? It's not even the lightest Chisora has been in the last 2 years.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by stevedoc »

danconnollyeire wrote:Chisora is surprisingly difficult to hit. He has that Frazier type defensive that gives very little target and is difficult to nail.
i agree if he threw more punches he could of beat vitali
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by jameswilson »

stevedoc wrote:
danconnollyeire wrote:Chisora is surprisingly difficult to hit. He has that Frazier type defensive that gives very little target and is difficult to nail.
i agree if he threw more punches he could of beat vitali
If only my Auntie had bollocks she would be my Uncle.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by TJ77 »

jameswilson wrote:
stevedoc wrote:
danconnollyeire wrote:Chisora is surprisingly difficult to hit. He has that Frazier type defensive that gives very little target and is difficult to nail.
i agree if he threw more punches he could of beat vitali
If only my Auntie had bollocks she would be my Uncle.
Im having that one 36 years and never heard that little gem . :TU:
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by jameswilson »

TJ77 wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
stevedoc wrote: i agree if he threw more punches he could of beat vitali
If only my Auntie had bollocks she would be my Uncle.
Im having that one 36 years and never heard that little gem . :TU:
:lol:

You've really never heard that one? I use it all the time on here, this forum is like a hotbed of opportunities to say it.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by Finn »

jameswilson wrote:
stevedoc wrote:
danconnollyeire wrote:Chisora is surprisingly difficult to hit. He has that Frazier type defensive that gives very little target and is difficult to nail.
i agree if he threw more punches he could of beat vitali
If only my Auntie had bollocks she would be my Uncle.
:lol:
dve3333
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 24 Mar 2005, 19:58

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by dve3333 »

Think the 2/1 for Chisora on points is a good bet. Have never been impressed with Scott and could easily see a motivated Del Boy outhustle and unsettle Scott who doesn't have the power to keep him at bay to win clearly on points over the 10 rounds. I see it being a good tear up as Scott has a tendency to trade when in close and don't see it being the stinker some are suggesting
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by funso banjo baby »

im not sure about this fight

havent seen enough of Scott but he clearly dsnt have any punch power

however chisora is slow

i can see a draw
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by lillywhite14 »

Get some dough on that then Funso.

25s with Ladbrokes :TU:
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by Finn »

im predicting either fighter on points plus BJS to win outright coming in on a 2 fold accumulator at 2/1 with sky bet.

Lets hope so because its my first prediction on my boxing betting face book page so it will be embarrassing if Scott KO's chisora because i have stated that has no chance of happening.

http://www.facebook.com/boxingbetting
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by jameswilson »

Finn wrote:im predicting either fighter on points plus BJS to win outright coming in on a 2 fold accumulator at 2/1 with sky bet.

Lets hope so because its my first prediction on my boxing betting face book page so it will be embarrassing if Scott KO's chisora because i have stated that has no chance of happening.

http://www.facebook.com/boxingbetting
That's 2/1 on tho isn't it rather than 2/1?
WelshDevil
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 536
Joined: 18 Sep 2006, 14:23

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by WelshDevil »

This is a good test for Dereck Chisora.

Malik Scott has skills but has had a few injuries and also Managerial problems - which kept him away for a few years.

Could be a snoozer of a fight, as Malik is pretty defence minded. But, this is a tricky assignment for 'Del Boy'. He needs to keep busy and pushing the action, if he stands off - he'll get picked off.
Maxsplit
Cruiserweight
Posts: 364
Joined: 13 Jul 2011, 22:26

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by Maxsplit »

Maxsplit wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Everything seems to point to a Scott points victory. Since his comeback he is a lot more slimline and serious. However he doesn't possess a heck of a lot of power. Chisora will be giving up height and reach and is never particularly hard to hit, and his power isn't really all that.

I think he will do the usual bullocking forward and will eat a lot of shots en route to a points defeat.
Chisora fought and gave a great account of himself against giants like Fury, Vitali & Helenius ... I'm not sure why 'giving up' 2 inches to Scott will make the blindest bit of difference :lol:

I think Chisora points is the safe bet. He will simply outwork the featherfisted, undermatched Scott and has home advantage.

However, given how feeble Scott's opposition has been and how strong Del Boys is and the fact he is a career lightest 16 stone ... don't discount a mid-late rounds KO :TU:

:box: :D
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by Final round »

Maxsplit wrote:
Maxsplit wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Everything seems to point to a Scott points victory. Since his comeback he is a lot more slimline and serious. However he doesn't possess a heck of a lot of power. Chisora will be giving up height and reach and is never particularly hard to hit, and his power isn't really all that.

I think he will do the usual bullocking forward and will eat a lot of shots en route to a points defeat.
Chisora fought and gave a great account of himself against giants like Fury, Vitali & Helenius ... I'm not sure why 'giving up' 2 inches to Scott will make the blindest bit of difference :lol:

I think Chisora points is the safe bet. He will simply outwork the featherfisted, undermatched Scott and has home advantage.

However, given how feeble Scott's opposition has been and how strong Del Boys is and the fact he is a career lightest 16 stone ... don't discount a mid-late rounds KO :TU:

:box: :D
You hedged your bets
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Chisora vs Scott

Post by jameswilson »

Maxsplit wrote:
Maxsplit wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Everything seems to point to a Scott points victory. Since his comeback he is a lot more slimline and serious. However he doesn't possess a heck of a lot of power. Chisora will be giving up height and reach and is never particularly hard to hit, and his power isn't really all that.

I think he will do the usual bullocking forward and will eat a lot of shots en route to a points defeat.
Chisora fought and gave a great account of himself against giants like Fury, Vitali & Helenius ... I'm not sure why 'giving up' 2 inches to Scott will make the blindest bit of difference :lol:

I think Chisora points is the safe bet. He will simply outwork the featherfisted, undermatched Scott and has home advantage.

However, given how feeble Scott's opposition has been and how strong Del Boys is and the fact he is a career lightest 16 stone ... don't discount a mid-late rounds KO :TU:

:box: :D
I'm very happy to be proved wrong.
Post Reply