Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by geoffburt07 »

Undercard of BJS v Ryder.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by palooka »

Good fight, very tough styles wise, won't be a stoppage but both will be trying to win, not good for the telly though.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Horse »

Awful fight, really awful.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by palooka »

Mary, Mary quite contrary, how do your flowers grow?
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by geoffburt07 »

palooka wrote:Good fight, very tough styles wise, won't be a stoppage but both will be trying to win, not good for the telly though.
Can't see it being a see saw fight but you never know. Frankie will win wide UD
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote:Mary, Mary quite contrary, how do your flowers grow?
What?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by palooka »

I don't mean it will be a good fight to watch, but it will be a good fight for both of them to learn things they can use later on in their careers, I'll not watch it from start to end, I can appreciate Skeet in Boxing News but not on the telly.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by palooka »

Horse wrote:
palooka wrote:Mary, Mary quite contrary, how do your flowers grow?
What?
I am implying that you try to be contrary in order to appear 'a character' who has insight and wit.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote:I am implying that you try to be contrary in order to appear 'a character' who has insight and wit.
You think most people will think this is a good fight?

Your little nursery rhyme quote was very witty by the way.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by palooka »

Horse wrote:
palooka wrote:I am implying that you try to be contrary in order to appear 'a character' who has insight and wit.
You think most people will think this is a good fight?

Your little nursery rhyme quote was very witty by the way.
Thank you :TU:

I don't think it is an amazing bout but Gavin has to fight someone decent and both Khan and Brook have other plans, Skeete has a lower ranking than is ability demands and needs a decent bout; both need to fight to earn a wage and that's it. No one really good with a high ranking will box Skeete as he looks a nightmare to box and is fit and tough.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Counter-puncher »

quite possibly a stylistic stinker even if it's not the worst matchup
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by palooka »

It's a good fight as in both will have to think and set traps to score points, if either takes the other than less than serious than they'll get surprised. It won't be a thriller but there is no one boxing at domestic title level that can test either Frankie or Bradley, Khan and Brook are well above and have proven it; Lee Purdy and Colin Lynes are excellent but box hot and cold.
Frankie Gavin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 393
Joined: 09 Jul 2009, 17:39

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Frankie Gavin »

Skeetes pulled out now accepted,yesterday but pulled out today
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Horse »

M. Hatton, Lynes, Purdy, Theophane, O'Donnell, Watson & Foot are all better opponents than Skeete.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Horse »

Frankie Gavin wrote:Skeetes pulled out now accepted,yesterday but pulled out today
Good, you can fight someone better now.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by palooka »

Horse wrote:M. Hatton, Lynes, Purdy, Theophane, O'Donnell, Watson & Foot are all better opponents than Skeete.
Are Hatton, Lynes, O'Donnell and Watson even boxing anymore? They've gone so quiet that I haven't noticed; Foot is a good boxer and has a tough fight lined up, Theopane was the weight below wasn't he (for any bouts that have meaning), Purdy would be a good fight. In any case Skeete has pulled out, what for? So we'll see who out of those mentioned will put up a better fight.
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by jessi »

Gavins to good for anyone in the uk, fight a ranked American, get the U.S prepared for him !
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Horse »

jessi wrote:Gavins to good for anyone in the uk, fight a ranked American, get the U.S prepared for him !
It's only one more fight to win the Lonsdale belt outright. A fight against Hatton would be a good measuring stick against Brook and Purdy would be a measuring stick against Alexander. They aren't bad fights for him at this stage.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by orbtastic »

This fight reminds me of Heffron/Vassell. It's a win/win fight for the promoter and he has a tick in the "contractual obligations" box for each fighter.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Counter-puncher »

Horse wrote:
jessi wrote:Gavins to good for anyone in the uk, fight a ranked American, get the U.S prepared for him !
It's only one more fight to win the Lonsdale belt outright. A fight against Hatton would be a good measuring stick against Brook and Purdy would be a measuring stick against Alexander. They aren't bad fights for him at this stage.

Frankie would abolutely stand Matty Hatt on his head IMO
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by Horse »

Counter-puncher wrote:Frankie would abolutely stand Matty Hatt on his head IMO
And that would make a great statement.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by JamesH »

Horse wrote:M. Hatton, Lynes, Purdy, Theophane, O'Donnell, Watson & Foot are all better opponents than Skeete.
Frankie would beat all of them, and while Bradley wasn't the most worthy contender, he may have had a hunger no longer in some of the fighters above. I'm not saying Skeete was my ideal choice, but for example, does Theophanes last two fights (or indeed his reign) mean he's earned a title shot? Has Watson or Lynes done enough yet to deserve another title shot? Styles make fights, and Matt Hatton was cut to order for Frankies style.

The problem is, had it not happened, the best opponent now would have been Vassell, but it did and we saw what happened there. I hope Frankie stays active, and the opponents standing will subseqently improve as he elevates beyond the domestic scene.
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by jessi »

Frankie is number 20 in the world on the boxrec 147lbs rankings ! I know it's not the best barometer but I feel it's fair, maybe Matthew hatton in September but by the end of the year or early next year I would love to see him in the ring with someone like paulie malignaggi ! It's time to shine and 2014 is big statement time, his going to make some good fighters look ordinary next year :yay:
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by pyenest77 »

Agree with most here. Not a fight I would pay for or be looking forward to watching. Hopefully the opponent will make for a better fight.
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2081
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Re: Frankie Gavin v Bradley Skeete

Post by jonp »

Is this still on?
Post Reply