Hatton undercard

G-man · Post by **G-man** » 03 Nov 2005, 13:28

Anyone know anything about this Dibb kid???

Naz to return?/Dibb on Hatton undercard

Prince Naseem Hamed has hinted that he may make a comeback in early 2006. The 31 year-old, who was recently pictured in a national newspaper looking more like a heavyweight than the trim, fit and former WBO featherweight king, told the Sheffield Today: "I've been boxing since I was seven years of age. I simply needed a break. "I've got two beautiful sons and a wife, and wanted to spend some time with them. Now, though, I've had my break. I miss boxing and I believe boxing misses me, too. "In the New Year you could witness something special."

Naz also revealed that the heir to his throne Bilal Dibb will appear on the undercard of the Ricky Hatton vs Carlos Maussa world title card at the Hallam FM Arena in Sheffield on November 26.

Naz, who has a personal interest in the Australian super-featherweight talent, believes the 20 year-old will prove to be something very special. "This kid is the second coming of Naseem Hamed," said an excited Naz.

"He's an awesome fighter. He's been watching lots of my videos, and has a tremendous amount of style, charisma and flair. I urge everyone to watch this kid because I have no doubts he can go all the way."

Tickets for 'The Unification' are available in person at the Hallam FM Arena or by calling the Hallam FM Arena box office on 0114 256 5656. Tickets are available at £50, £75, £100, £175 and £250.

Ringside tickets priced at £350, and Platinum Corporate Packages entitling guests to a ringside ticket, free food and drink inside our corporate tent
are available at £500 and can be obtained by contacting Fight Academy on
0114 2560550.

KO Artist · Post by **KO Artist** » 03 Nov 2005, 13:33

G-man wrote:Hatton-Maussa undercard!
The undercard is starting to come together for the November 26 Ricky Hatton vs Carlos Maussa IBF/WBA world jr welterweight unification pay-per-view card in Sheffield, England. Unofficially, cruiserweight Carl Thompson, heavyweight Roman Greenberg, featherweight Michael Gomez, middleweight Matt Macklin, and jr middleweight Matthew Hatton will all see action against opponents to be named. "Unification" will be available live in the United States starting at 4PM ET via cable systems iN Demand and TVN and from satellite providers DirecTV and Dish Network. The broadcast is being distributed in the USA by Integrated Sports.

Not entirely certain how they're gonna get Gomez on the show unless he'sleft SN too.

I thought Greenberg is cut, Thompson is off and Gomez isnt fighting?

Is this true.

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 03 Nov 2005, 13:34

Well I spoke to Gomez today and he's definately not fighting.

G-man · Post by **G-man** » 03 Nov 2005, 13:38

KO Atrist wrote:
G-man wrote:Hatton-Maussa undercard!
The undercard is starting to come together for the November 26 Ricky Hatton vs Carlos Maussa IBF/WBA world jr welterweight unification pay-per-view card in Sheffield, England. Unofficially, cruiserweight Carl Thompson, heavyweight Roman Greenberg, featherweight Michael Gomez, middleweight Matt Macklin, and jr middleweight Matthew Hatton will all see action against opponents to be named. "Unification" will be available live in the United States starting at 4PM ET via cable systems iN Demand and TVN and from satellite providers DirecTV and Dish Network. The broadcast is being distributed in the USA by Integrated Sports.

Not entirely certain how they're gonna get Gomez on the show unless he'sleft SN too.
I thought Greenberg is cut, Thompson is off and Gomez isnt fighting?

Is this true.

As Kevin says, it looks like there won't be Gomez. I'm not sure about the other two.

Krence v Baker is definitely off as most suspected after Krences' loss to Chagaev, but this article mentions a couple of kids that may be on the card:

Battered Krence pulled out of fight

MARK KRENCE'S trainer has pulled him out of a clash on Sheffield Arena's Ricky Hatton undercard after a torrid match in Germany.

Sheffield-based Richard Poxon claims the Chesterfield heavweight was hit a dozen times in the groin in a gruelling encounter with Ruslan Chagaev from Uzbekistan in Germany on October 22.

"It was a disgraceful performance by his opponent," said Poxon "and one that makes it necessary that Mark has a good rest.

"Mark hadn't let his opponent touch him for three straight rounds, and that was when his trainer obviously told him to go out and do whatever was necessary to win.

"He volleyed Mark hard in the lower abdomen at least 10 to 12 times. That just took his legs away from him. Almost cut him in half.

"He chopped the back of Mark's head and it was then I was going to throw in the towel as a protest, but the referee stopped it.

"I made it clear to them that I never wanted to attend a boxing match in Germany ever again after witnessing scenes like that," said Poxon.

Krence, 29, was being lined up to fight 23-year-old Ingle boxer Carl Baker, for the British Masters title, on the undercard of the Hatton v Carlos Maussa bill.

"He needs a rest after the experience in Germany. We'll do the Baker fight later on."

Other local fighters pencilled in for the bill on November 26 are city lightweight Nicky Smedley and Mexborough middleweight Stuart Brookes.

02 November 2005

boxingchat · Post by **boxingchat** » 03 Nov 2005, 14:39

fornicate me. Why don't they say Tyson, DeLa Hoya and Sugar Ray Leonard are on the undercard?

It seems they are making it up as they go along.

What a shit undercard. But as the saying goes "You can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear"

PPV will be a joke if Hatton goes quickly. Nothing else on show other than novices and Warren rejects.

Why no Clinton Woods? Rumour is The Greedy Family from Manchester are refusing to cut their cake too many times.

Why pay others when you can keep it all for yourselves?

Waterman and Hobson (Steptoe and Son) are getting a small fee to stage the show for 'Carpetbagger and Son' and they have no say. Watch them get royaly fucked off after this one when another cheap mug is sourced for less money.

My tip: It won't sell out, the show will be crap. Both the Hatton's will get beat too. Any takers?

sweetscience · Post by **sweetscience** » 03 Nov 2005, 14:49

that is one hell of a crap bill never mind undercard

no chance am i watching it never mind paying

BunglesFingers · Post by **BunglesFingers** » 03 Nov 2005, 15:35

When I see cards like this I'm glad that Sky no longer get my 35 pound a month, never mind stumping up another 15 or whatever it is for this bollocks.

Will be interesting to see the PPV figures for this one.

G-man · Post by **G-man** » 03 Nov 2005, 15:43

boxingchat wrote: What a shit undercard.

Of course it will seem poor after the extravaganza of an undercard that was laid on by SN on the Hatton v Tszyu show.

Phenomenal-Nutrition · Post by **Phenomenal-Nutrition** » 03 Nov 2005, 17:17

boxingchat wrote:My tip: It won't sell out, the show will be crap. Both the Hatton's will get beat too. Any takers?

What odds are you giving on both Hattons not losing?

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Hamed may come out of retirement in 2006

- I doubt it though

KO Artist · Post by **KO Artist** » 03 Nov 2005, 18:45

boxingchat wrote:fornicate me. Why don't they say Tyson, DeLa Hoya and Sugar Ray Leonard are on the undercard?

It seems they are making it up as they go along.

What a shit undercard. But as the saying goes "You can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear"

PPV will be a joke if Hatton goes quickly. Nothing else on show other than novices and Warren rejects.

Why no Clinton Woods? Rumour is The Greedy Family from Manchester are refusing to cut their cake too many times.

Why pay others when you can keep it all for yourselves?

Waterman and Hobson (Steptoe and Son) are getting a small fee to stage the show for 'Carpetbagger and Son' and they have no say. Watch them get royaly fucked off after this one when another cheap mug is sourced for less money.

My tip: It won't sell out, the show will be crap. Both the Hatton's will get beat too. Any takers?

You do talk some crap.

You should save it for when a letter from the authorities drops on your bosses doormat.

He is in severe trouble.

Zhuge · Post by **Zhuge** » 03 Nov 2005, 23:02

It'd be good to see Carl Thompson back fighting again.

Zhuge · Post by **Zhuge** » 03 Nov 2005, 23:13

Maybe they could stick Matthew Hatton in for some lower level title -- the WBF champ isn't much.

J · Post by J » 04 Nov 2005, 07:12

KO Atrist wrote:
boxingchat wrote:fornicate me. Why don't they say Tyson, DeLa Hoya and Sugar Ray Leonard are on the undercard?

It seems they are making it up as they go along.

What a shit undercard. But as the saying goes "You can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear"

PPV will be a joke if Hatton goes quickly. Nothing else on show other than novices and Warren rejects.

Why no Clinton Woods? Rumour is The Greedy Family from Manchester are refusing to cut their cake too many times.

Why pay others when you can keep it all for yourselves?

Waterman and Hobson (Steptoe and Son) are getting a small fee to stage the show for 'Carpetbagger and Son' and they have no say. Watch them get royaly fucked off after this one when another cheap mug is sourced for less money.

My tip: It won't sell out, the show will be crap. Both the Hatton's will get beat too. Any takers?
You do talk some crap.

You should save it for when a letter from the authorities drops on your bosses doormat.

He is in severe trouble.

HMM DOES SEEM FW HAS PUT HIS FOOT IN IT.

Boxingchat dont think you are really in position to criticise undercards after the Zoo Hatton fight.

That undercard was truly awful and makes this look fantastic.

Tell you one thing if hatton had lost the whole fornicating place would have gone off, you couldnt get a beer for love nor money, the public knew the undercard was crap and spent the whole time in the outer part of the MEN getting pissed. My mate got asked if he was was Manc in a rather aggressive manner and half the lads didnt even try to get to the bar as it was futile and intimidating for some.

didnt bother me I hasten to add, but these things dont but still queing for 45 mins nearly sparring 3 people out for being chavs and trying it on and then getting 4 pints of piss warm cider instead of lager was not ideal.

there were 22 thousand folk going through the same thing and the frustration factor was high, if hatton had lost I truly belive a riot would have ensued.

a lot of people were not happy at the heat, lack of facilities to even get water and the dire undercard being passed off as enterainment add to this 2 am start and yes you can be very thankful indeed hatton won.

feel free to answer any of the above allegations and if you can to a decent level then of course feel free to criticise others promotions, however if you cant then I suggest you shut the fornicate up and get your own house in order.

G-man · Post by **G-man** » 04 Nov 2005, 07:25

Zhuge wrote:Maybe they could stick Matthew Hatton in for some lower level title -- the WBF champ isn't much.

I don't know if it's true, but someone's told me that James Hare has turned down the chance to fight him on this show in some sort of eliminator for the British Title.

Lenny · Post by **Lenny** » 04 Nov 2005, 07:33

The one thing Hatton v Tszyu had though was a competitive headliner with the champ (a legend) going against the young pretender and big home favourite. It also had names like Danny Williams and Enzo Mac albeit against very limited opposition and good fights for David Barnes and Wayne Alexander.

This fight has Hatton in a joke fight against a fighter who doesn't even rank in Hatton's top 5 opponents. And given the stick he received pre Tszyu this says a lot. Dress it up as a unification all you like but it's still a mismatch against a very limited fighter who was picked to make Harris look good to an American audience. Add to that seemingly nothing at all of note on the undercard and try and pass it off as ppv? I don't remember anyone saying they weren't going to buy the Tszyu show. I won't buy this.

J · Post by J » 04 Nov 2005, 07:37

Lenny Albert wrote:The one thing Hatton v Tszyu had though was a competitive headliner with the champ (a legend) going against the young pretender and big home favourite. It also had names like Danny Williams and Enzo Mac albeit against very limited opposition and good fights for David Barnes and Wayne Alexander.

This fight has Hatton in a joke fight against a fighter who doesn't even rank in Hatton's top 5 opponents. And given the stick he received pre Tszyu this says a lot. Dress it up as a unification all you like but it's still a mismatch against a very limited fighter who was picked to make Harris look good to an American audience. Add to that seemingly nothing at all of note on the undercard and try and pass it off as ppv? I don't remember anyone saying they weren't going to buy the Tszyu show. I won't buy this.

i do agree with that Lenny good post, my rant was more to do with the fact people in glass houses .....ill still buy this tho. Fact is Ive got more money than sense (thats not a boast i dont have alot of sense at times)

and apart from Mike Tyson fights I buy most ppv's even the sentana ones. Its only 15 quid, that dont even cover a couple of hours down the pub does it.

Zhuge · Post by **Zhuge** » 04 Nov 2005, 08:07

G-man wrote:
Zhuge wrote:Maybe they could stick Matthew Hatton in for some lower level title -- the WBF champ isn't much.
I don't know if it's true, but someone's told me that James Hare has turned down the chance to fight him on this show in some sort of eliminator for the British Title.

Too bad -- that would've been interesting.

Since the card is PPV here in the US, it would be nice to see some of the British fighters that I've never actually seen fight.

states · Post by **states** » 09 Nov 2005, 12:47

Secondsout.com confirm The Cat is on the bill:

http://secondsout.com/UK/news.cfm?ccs=228&cs=17848

Also, classy middleweight Geard Ajetovic takes on a name familiar to these shores, Eugenio Montero:

http://secondsout.com/UK/news.cfm?ccs=228&cs=17842

Could be a decent scrap, that one.

chado · Post by **chado** » 09 Nov 2005, 15:15

G-man wrote:
Zhuge wrote:Maybe they could stick Matthew Hatton in for some lower level title -- the WBF champ isn't much.
I don't know if it's true, but someone's told me that James Hare has turned down the chance to fight him on this show in some sort of eliminator for the British Title.

G-man · Post by **G-man** » 09 Nov 2005, 15:27

Apparently Hare turned it down because he was injured.

It was gonna be a British Title eliminator.

hitman_hatton1 · Post by **hitman_hatton1** » 09 Nov 2005, 15:37

carl thompson always puts on a good fight.

surely it isn't asking much to bring in a halfway decent opponent for him.

i'd still pay for it though cos hatton always delivers the goods.

JimmyJamJerusalem · Post by **JimmyJamJerusalem** » 10 Nov 2005, 03:54

Sounds piss pour, but this thread has grown a little confusing with all the cutting and pulling out.

Definitively, what is the Hatton undercard?

G-man · Post by **G-man** » 10 Nov 2005, 08:06

JimmyJamJerusalem wrote:Sounds piss pour, but this thread has grown a little confusing with all the cutting and pulling out.

Definitively, what is the Hatton undercard?

Don't take this as gospel as it's bound to change further between now and the 26th:

Ricky Hatton V Carlos Maussa
Geard Ajetovic V Eugenio Montero
Roman Greenberg V ?
Carl Thompson V ?
Matt Macklin V ?
Matthew Hatton V ?
Billy Dib V ?
Nicky Semdley v ?
Stuart Brookes v ?

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 10 Nov 2005, 08:11

Looks like an abysmal undercard for a PPV "event" - as bad as the last Hatton one. What makes it even worse is the main event features a fight where Hatton is a 10-1 favorite.

Kilburn · Post by **Kilburn** » 10 Nov 2005, 08:20

I don't know why anyone would buy this fight card. Maussa is such a poor example of a world champion. I don't give a flying f*ck whether he beat Harris - ALL the emphasis was on how badly prepared the defending champion was not how good Maussa looked. So what if it's a "unification" fight, what significance does that really have when the opponent has virtually no technique be it offensively or defensively?

I personally think it's going to be an embarrassing spectacle for true boxing fans.