Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post Reply

Is it ok to match up fighters when managers are absent?

Yes
11
52%
No
1
5%
Shaddup&FahQ!
0
No votes
Where the hell is my beer?
6
29%
I relate strongly to my feminine side, and want to explore the reasons you are asking this question, rather than give a straight forward answer to this (or any) question.
3
14%
 
Total votes: 21

BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post by BoxBuzz »

Is it ok to match up fighters who have not been tended to during the week?

Or should we leave them behind, without fights when managers do not make their wishes known?

For the next week, you can have two votes, and you can change them at will if you reconsider you original response/s.

At the end of next week, I will begin following the decision rendered by the masses.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post by Crease »

BoxBuzz wrote:Is it ok to match up fighters who have not been tended to during the week?
I would say a resounding Yes.

Even when I am selecting bouts for unmatched fighters, I tend to follow certain criteria:

1. Stable mates do not face each other.
2. I always look at the official rankings and pair up fighters of similar positions.
3. If there's an even number of unmatched fighters I don't include any CPU opponents in the bouts.
BoxBuzz wrote:Or should we leave them behind, without fights when managers do not make their wishes known?
I see this as the greater of two evils - fighters don't even get any experience for that week then.

Obviously is always more preferable for Managers to match up their own guys - in that way - win, lose or draw it comes down to a Management decision - but sadly there are a few Managers who just don't take the few minutes to select a CPU opponent for their guys.

It confounds me really.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5853
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post by p4p1 »

How about something slightly evil like fighters that aren't matched up take on top HWs either as a P4P fight or as a straight HW fight.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post by BoxBuzz »

I've often thought that George Foreman could be sent in to "adjust attitudes" of some of these LHW's.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5853
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post by p4p1 »

BoxBuzz wrote:I've often thought that George Foreman could be sent in to "adjust attitudes" of some of these LHW's.
See I knew it was a good idea. Forget to match your fighters time to fight a foreman/Tyson/Liston etc
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post by BoxBuzz »

Hmm...Perhaps This week George will face ALL untended fighters.

It will be the sim equivalent to the Toronto 5.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4457
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post by NazNaci1 »

BoxBuzz wrote:Hmm...Perhaps This week George will face ALL untended fighters.

It will be the sim equivalent to the Toronto 5.
An excellent idea. Though I need to get Tunney matched up.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46288
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post by gilgamesh »

p4p1 wrote:How about something slightly evil like fighters that aren't matched up take on top HWs either as a P4P fight or as a straight HW fight.
:twisted: I like it
glittermonkey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2658
Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03

Re: Halfway through! I'd like opinions on this

Post by glittermonkey »

Give 'em to Big George!
Post Reply