Burns undercard

Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Burns undercard

Post by Alba »

Jon SLowey v Marco Mcullogh (sp) for the celtic title ... good fight .
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: Burns undercard

Post by Emmseegee »

I think Selby will blow Walsh away tbh.
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Alba wrote:Jon SLowey v Marco Mcullogh (sp) for the celtic title ... good fight .
I like that fight. Slowey is counter punching southpaw and McCulloch will walk forward all night and let bombs go. Should be good.
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

David Brophy v Jason Ball. Another decent fight as Ball will come to win.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by billy nelson »

Alba wrote:
geoffburt07 wrote:Stop getting your panties in a twist Billy aha. I said I don't want to take a holiday and travel to the to the show if its not 50/50 fights. Just because there's certain belts on the line doesn't mean they will be good fights. Hearn usually matches well and I know Morrison isn't scared to put his boys in with good guys but like most, I wouldn't buy tickets without knowing the line up.
I think the line up of home fighters is decent enough value for £40 , plus getting to see Luke Campbell and Scott Cardle aswell ,as these guys wont be fighting reguarly up here. Its all down to opnions of course, but 3/4 title fights over the championship distance is good value, while the opponents might not be public knowledge or even up on Box rec im sure there will be some decent ones in there ...
Decent enough Alba?
Compare the quality on show,venue and value for money compared to certain other shows lately and you'll surely come to the same conclusion as me
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Burns undercard

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

maley1984 wrote:
geoffburt07 wrote:I knew simpson was boxing for commenwealth but think they found it hard to get opponent.

just had a tweet off ryan walsh and his fighting selby for both his titles which wud mean no shot for simpson at feather
I think Simpson should stay at super feather anyway. He looks good at the weight.
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Simmons boxing Argintina champ. Slowey v Mccolloch. Brophy v Jason Ball. Luke Campbell v lee Connelly. Micheal Roberts v eddie Nessbitt. Simpson injured
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Paul Appleby returns to the ring aswell. Either 4x3s or 6x3s at light welter
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by billy nelson »

Slowey boxing a welsh lad now
fightscorecollector
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 473
Joined: 20 Dec 2011, 12:07

Re: Burns undercard

Post by fightscorecollector »

geoffburt i heard the same thing via twitter from simmons trainer about him fighting the argentine champion
Paullow
Super Middleweight
Posts: 179
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 16:01

Re: Burns undercard

Post by Paullow »

Undercard will be considered dross to the casual Sky fan. Can see a fair few tuning in at 10pm or so just to see the main event.

http://checkhookboxing.com/showthread.p ... ing-strong

General consensus aint good on there.
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Billy who's the welsh lad he's boxing. It isn't turley is it
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Burns undercard

Post by expe »

Paullow wrote:Undercard will be considered dross to the casual Sky fan. Can see a fair few tuning in at 10pm or so just to see the main event.

http://checkhookboxing.com/showthread.p ... ing-strong

General consensus aint good on there.
It's not and it isn't a great card, but that place is full of the old ESB lot, you've got people saying that a prime Scott Harrison would take out Ricky Burns in 3 rounds :doh: And that pudendum Rob Palmer's there as well, good reason to avoid it, comes out with some of the most ridiculous claims ever. Always used to say that before a PPV he'd have 50-60 people asking him whether to buy it, just looked at his twitter and he appears to have no friends, all his tweets are to Eddie Hearn, Dave Coldwell, Spencer Fearon, Steve Lillis and Dean Powell.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Burns undercard

Post by lefty »

expe wrote:
Paullow wrote:Undercard will be considered dross to the casual Sky fan. Can see a fair few tuning in at 10pm or so just to see the main event.

http://checkhookboxing.com/showthread.p ... ing-strong

General consensus aint good on there.
It's not and it isn't a great card, but that place is full of the old ESB lot, you've got people saying that a prime Scott Harrison would take out Ricky Burns in 3 rounds :doh: And that pudendum Rob Palmer's there as well, good reason to avoid it, comes out with some of the most ridiculous claims ever. Always used to say that before a PPV he'd have 50-60 people asking him whether to buy it, just looked at his twitter and he appears to have no friends, all his tweets are to Eddie Hearn, Dave Coldwell, Spencer Fearon, Steve Lillis and Dean Powell.
I was in check hook boxing a little while back..... some of the threads in there are insane :lol:
Paullow
Super Middleweight
Posts: 179
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 16:01

Re: Burns undercard

Post by Paullow »

expe wrote:
Paullow wrote:Undercard will be considered dross to the casual Sky fan. Can see a fair few tuning in at 10pm or so just to see the main event.

http://checkhookboxing.com/showthread.p ... ing-strong

General consensus aint good on there.
It's not and it isn't a great card, but that place is full of the old ESB lot, you've got people saying that a prime Scott Harrison would take out Ricky Burns in 3 rounds :doh: And that pudendum Rob Palmer's there as well, good reason to avoid it, comes out with some of the most ridiculous claims ever. Always used to say that before a PPV he'd have 50-60 people asking him whether to buy it, just looked at his twitter and he appears to have no friends, all his tweets are to Eddie Hearn, Dave Coldwell, Spencer Fearon, Steve Lillis and Dean Powell.
:o

Think Ricky would have at least seen the 5th round.

:wink:
Paullow
Super Middleweight
Posts: 179
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 16:01

Re: Burns undercard

Post by Paullow »

John Simpson off the undercard now. Weakest undercard since the new Sky format?
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns undercard

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Paullow wrote:
expe wrote:
Paullow wrote:Undercard will be considered dross to the casual Sky fan. Can see a fair few tuning in at 10pm or so just to see the main event.

http://checkhookboxing.com/showthread.p ... ing-strong

General consensus aint good on there.
It's not and it isn't a great card, but that place is full of the old ESB lot, you've got people saying that a prime Scott Harrison would take out Ricky Burns in 3 rounds :doh: And that pudendum Rob Palmer's there as well, good reason to avoid it, comes out with some of the most ridiculous claims ever. Always used to say that before a PPV he'd have 50-60 people asking him whether to buy it, just looked at his twitter and he appears to have no friends, all his tweets are to Eddie Hearn, Dave Coldwell, Spencer Fearon, Steve Lillis and Dean Powell.
:o

Think Ricky would have at least seen the 5th round.

:wink:
Aye exactly, a Prime Scott Harrison would destroy a hard working, nicey nicey Ricky Burns. You are better being lucky than good in this sport.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Burns undercard

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Paullow wrote:John Simpson off the undercard now. Weakest undercard since the new Sky format?
What happened to him?
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Think he done his shoulder in sparring. Who is slowey boxing now? Does anyone know? Heard Cardle v Gary Fox but again not vonfirmed
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Burns undercard

Post by whiskey »

Beltran is legit and a proper throwback.

I forecast a long difficult night for Ricky and this result is by no means assured.

Bookies have Burns a 2/9 favorite whereas Beltran is a ridiculous 10/3 outsider.

If Rick brings his A-game, plus the fantastic crowd behind him, he should dominate.

If the same Rick turns up that appeared last time, that belt will be going home with Beltran.

No pressure Billy !
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Burns undercard

Post by JimJim2009 »

Billy if Ricky loses will you get fired ?
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Burns undercard

Post by daviddee »

Beltran is good but can't see how Ricky can lose to him.. I think this is another test to show he belongs at World Level.. Can Beltran win? Yes if he has been looked beyond.. Ricky should!! Be better in every department. I don't understand why everyone always goes on about Billy getting fired and Ricky looking for a new coach.. Billy may well wind people up the wrong way but he is 100% the right man for Ricky Burns.. He has got an average British level fighter through hard work and sheer dedication to become a world class operator.. Ricky will win then hopefully we will see the unification fights :)
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Burns undercard

Post by expe »

Beltran's sparring with Pacquiao won't help him one bit, in fact it will probably be a hindrance. Pacquiao is a 5'6" southpaw and Burns is 5'10", has a longer reach and boxes out of the orthodox stance with a different style. Sparring with someone like Pacquiao, it's difficult to really stand and trade and like most sparring partners, come fight night, I'd expect him to offer very little once he's backed up onto the ropes, he will most likely go into a shell and cover up without offering much back.
geoffburt07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49

Re: Burns undercard

Post by geoffburt07 »

Trust me ricky is not 5f 10. Boxrec and other sites have him at 5f 10 but he's defo smaller than that mate.
Last edited by geoffburt07 on 26 Aug 2013, 10:58, edited 1 time in total.
sgtcecil
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 979
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 14:38

Re: Burns undercard

Post by sgtcecil »

geoffburt07 wrote:Paul Appleby returns to the ring aswell. Either 4x3s or 6x3s at light welter
Take it Paul is not with Frank anymore? Is he a Morrison fighter?
Post Reply