GGG/Joppy.

Post Reply
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

GGG/Joppy.

Post by Rover »

How does this one go? Joppy was probably the second best middle a decade ago.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46511
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by gilgamesh »

GGG KO sometime between rounds 4 and 7
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:GGG KO sometime between rounds 4 and 7
I think he'd stop him also. Julio Cesar Green had Joppy badly hurt. We all saw what Tito did.
Perseus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3199
Joined: 26 Jul 2007, 03:58

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by Perseus »

Too bad we never got to see Joppy vs Holmes.
We had the Joppy(wba)/Hopkins(ibf)/Holmes(wbc) years in the late 90's up to the middleweight tournament.
Hopkins proved clear superior to both of them but Joppy/Holmes was a solid match that was missed in that era.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by Rover »

Perseus wrote:Too bad we never got to see Joppy vs Holmes.
We had the Joppy(wba)/Hopkins(ibf)/Holmes(wbc) years in the late 90's up to the middleweight tournament.
Hopkins proved clear superior to both of them but Joppy/Holmes was a solid match that was missed in that era.
I'd have gone with Joppy on points.
scallum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 10:06

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by scallum »

Probably no good for joppy
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46511
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by gilgamesh »

I was thinking about this topic, and honestly I gotta say I can't imagine Joppy doing too well with any of the Middleweight greats of the past. Even a lot of the Past Middleweight Contenders would be too much for him.

I think to put Joppy in interesting dream matches, you'd have to put him in against Welterweight greats...and I'd have to favor most of them over him as well

I'm not trying to suggest Joppy just outright sucked or nothing...I just don't think he had anything special to ever get by the Greatest fighters of any particular generation. He's not the strongest guy in the world, he's not a particularly big Middleweight, he's not the slickest boxer in the world.

He was a guy that was good at a lot, but not great at anything.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:I was thinking about this topic, and honestly I gotta say I can't imagine Joppy doing too well with any of the Middleweight greats of the past. Even a lot of the Past Middleweight Contenders would be too much for him.

I think to put Joppy in interesting dream matches, you'd have to put him in against Welterweight greats...and I'd have to favor most of them over him as well

I'm not trying to suggest Joppy just outright sucked or nothing...I just don't think he had anything special to ever get by the Greatest fighters of any particular generation. He's not the strongest guy in the world, he's not a particularly big Middleweight, he's not the slickest boxer in the world.

He was a guy that was good at a lot, but not great at anything.
I've never heard anyone on here claim he was great or he'd beat the great middles. I put GGG against him because he'd be GGG's toughest test in terms of the comp GGG's fought so far IMO.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46511
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by gilgamesh »

Rover wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I was thinking about this topic, and honestly I gotta say I can't imagine Joppy doing too well with any of the Middleweight greats of the past. Even a lot of the Past Middleweight Contenders would be too much for him.

I think to put Joppy in interesting dream matches, you'd have to put him in against Welterweight greats...and I'd have to favor most of them over him as well

I'm not trying to suggest Joppy just outright sucked or nothing...I just don't think he had anything special to ever get by the Greatest fighters of any particular generation. He's not the strongest guy in the world, he's not a particularly big Middleweight, he's not the slickest boxer in the world.

He was a guy that was good at a lot, but not great at anything.
I've never heard anyone on here claim he was great or he'd beat the great middles. I put GGG against him because he'd be GGG's toughest test in terms of the comp GGG's fought so far IMO.
I agree with that. Though now that I think about, Macklin vs Joppy would be an interesting fight.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:
Rover wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I was thinking about this topic, and honestly I gotta say I can't imagine Joppy doing too well with any of the Middleweight greats of the past. Even a lot of the Past Middleweight Contenders would be too much for him.

I think to put Joppy in interesting dream matches, you'd have to put him in against Welterweight greats...and I'd have to favor most of them over him as well

I'm not trying to suggest Joppy just outright sucked or nothing...I just don't think he had anything special to ever get by the Greatest fighters of any particular generation. He's not the strongest guy in the world, he's not a particularly big Middleweight, he's not the slickest boxer in the world.

He was a guy that was good at a lot, but not great at anything.
I've never heard anyone on here claim he was great or he'd beat the great middles. I put GGG against him because he'd be GGG's toughest test in terms of the comp GGG's fought so far IMO.
I agree with that. Though now that I think about, Macklin vs Joppy would be an interesting fight.
Yeah, though I'd take Joppy via decision there.
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Re: GGG/Joppy.

Post by Vladimir5555 »

GGG via KO 3 - 6 round
Post Reply