No. And feel free to resurrect this if Clev wins. As long as it's not via hometown stoppage, I'll be giving him credit as he'll have done very well indeed.WelshJack wrote:Is Bellew not as good as Campillo?
Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
JDJ has always been a guy who is very articulate about boxing
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23244
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
I love Cleverly and im expecting to open up a can of whoop ass(sorry
) on Kovalev but i wish he would stop banging on about Hopkins,he,s been going on about these big fights with Bernard for years now and it doesnt wash when your fighting the Tommy Karpencys and Tony Bellews of this world,fair enough you want B-Hop but just stop it now,even just mention unification fights thats a start mate
And before anyone says anything about Bellew,yes he,s a decent fighter who,s done well to earn a title shot but he didnt deserve one against Nathan at that time,thats all
And before anyone says anything about Bellew,yes he,s a decent fighter who,s done well to earn a title shot but he didnt deserve one against Nathan at that time,thats all
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
I'm not one of those told you so people cause I know why some people can see it as a close fight which it is but Clev has too much class and it will show. Feel free to resurrect this if Kovalev wins.Riddick Blowe wrote:No. And feel free to resurrect this if Clev wins. As long as it's not via hometown stoppage, I'll be giving him credit as he'll have done very well indeed.WelshJack wrote:Is Bellew not as good as Campillo?
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Nathan's chin has never been tested???
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
To be fair he got hit with some very clean shots by Bellew of course it is not the same power but they were unexpected shots as Clev let Bellew get to him and went all out to try and hurt him, forgetting about his defence this is different Clev will box his head off.taffytoon wrote:Nathan's chin has never been tested???
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23244
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Karo Murat landed some thunderous punches also,i think his chins one of his best assets as of yetWelshJack wrote:To be fair he got hit with some very clean shots by Bellew of course it is not the same power but they were unexpected shots as Clev let Bellew get to him and went all out to try and hurt him, forgetting about his defence this is different Clev will box his head off.taffytoon wrote:Nathan's chin has never been tested???
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Riddock bowe i cant fuking wait to ram those words down your throat on sunday morning
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
You go for it pal haha TEAM CLEVllamalew wrote:Riddock bowe i cant fuking wait to ram those words down your throat on sunday morning
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23244
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
But Sergey Kovalevs fought in America,he MUST be good 
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Murat isnt that big of a puncher though to be honest. However I do fancy Cleverly at the moment.handsofstone wrote:Karo Murat landed some thunderous punches also,i think his chins one of his best assets as of yetWelshJack wrote:To be fair he got hit with some very clean shots by Bellew of course it is not the same power but they were unexpected shots as Clev let Bellew get to him and went all out to try and hurt him, forgetting about his defence this is different Clev will box his head off.taffytoon wrote:Nathan's chin has never been tested???
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Ok?handsofstone wrote:But Sergey Kovalevs fought in America,he MUST be good
I've never seen someone use this reasoning.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Wow, someone's emotional. It's really nothing personal buddy.llamalew wrote:Riddock bowe i cant fuking wait to ram those words down your throat on sunday morning
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Nothing personal from me pal. I just think you got an irrational hatred for cleverly, as 99% of your posts are about him
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23244
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
You should read more posts then sircrusader wrote:Ok?handsofstone wrote:But Sergey Kovalevs fought in America,he MUST be good
I've never seen someone use this reasoning.
No-ones worth a sh1t until they fight in the States,thems the rules
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Can you give me examples of someone saying that a fighter must be good because they fought in America?
Even if you can adduce examples, I doubt that sentiment is widespread.
Even if you can adduce examples, I doubt that sentiment is widespread.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
I think he's trying to say that folk in general overhype fighters who are in turn hyped in the US. But who knows, really.crusader wrote:Can you give me examples of someone saying that a fighter must be good because they fought in America?
Even if you can adduce examples, I doubt that sentiment is widespread.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23244
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Isnt the general consencus that until youve fought in the US,your achievements,credentials,talent etc arent justified because you havent fought on that specific area on the planetcrusader wrote:Can you give me examples of someone saying that a fighter must be good because they fought in America?
Even if you can adduce examples, I doubt that sentiment is widespread.
Calzaghe being an example until he eventually did fight there although i,ll admit his opposition was less than stellar 70% of the time
Benn,Eubank,Collins will never be mentioned in the same breath as lesser fighters
the only reason Haye gets a little respect is coz Americas desperate for ANYONE to dethrone the brothers Klitschko
GGG starting to get credit now coz he,s beating Proksa,Rosado in the States,not much better than the opposition he was facing before IMO
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23244
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Riddick Blowe wrote:I think he's trying to say that folk in general overhype fighters who are in turn hyped in the US. But who knows, really.crusader wrote:Can you give me examples of someone saying that a fighter must be good because they fought in America?
Even if you can adduce examples, I doubt that sentiment is widespread.
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Ok, I understand that point, which is much different from suggesting one must be good if they fought in America.
I don't think the Kovalev hype is that excessive given his recent performances, and I think many of the predictions of him winning easily are based as much on perceptions of Clev's limitations as on Kovalev's strengths. I don't think these perceptions stem largely from where the fighters have competed though; I think recent opposition is the main factor, with people associating Clev's mediocre opposition with a lack of ability, and Kovalev's impressive knockouts of better fighters with more ability. Moreover, Kovalev's strengths (mainly his power) make a much stronger visual impact than Clev's (good stamina, work rate, and chin) do.
I don't think the Kovalev hype is that excessive given his recent performances, and I think many of the predictions of him winning easily are based as much on perceptions of Clev's limitations as on Kovalev's strengths. I don't think these perceptions stem largely from where the fighters have competed though; I think recent opposition is the main factor, with people associating Clev's mediocre opposition with a lack of ability, and Kovalev's impressive knockouts of better fighters with more ability. Moreover, Kovalev's strengths (mainly his power) make a much stronger visual impact than Clev's (good stamina, work rate, and chin) do.
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
Question is who's playing lacy??
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
I doubt either of them will.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
I don't really understand your last point mate. Cleverly is the most 'paperist' of champions in the entire sport. It's not as if Nathan even won his title legitimately. He was handed it on a plate. Neither him or Bellew had any right to be contesting an alleged world title that night.handsofstone wrote:I love Cleverly and im expecting to open up a can of whoop ass(sorry) on Kovalev but i wish he would stop banging on about Hopkins,he,s been going on about these big fights with Bernard for years now and it doesnt wash when your fighting the Tommy Karpencys and Tony Bellews of this world,fair enough you want B-Hop but just stop it now,even just mention unification fights thats a start mate
And before anyone says anything about Bellew,yes he,s a decent fighter who,s done well to earn a title shot but he didnt deserve one against Nathan at that time,thats all
This is his first proper "title" fight in my eyes.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Clev - this will be a "Calzaghe vs Lacy" repeat happening
But even now it's still a paper title.lillywhite14 wrote:This is his first proper "title" fight in my eyes.