Think he took 2/3 points away and he still ended up winning on all cards. It wasn't the best nights refereeing by green. Cox was lucky he wasn't chucked outhandsofstone wrote:It was the countless infringements from Cox that Mark Green(im sure) let him away with that riled me most about that fightgeoffburt07 wrote:Jamie cox v Sai. Man that was some terrible scoring. Canny remember the exact score but it was dreadful
What are the top three worst scorecards ever
-
geoffburt07
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 237
- Joined: 16 Jul 2010, 09:49
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
Stephen Smith v John Simpson 2 in Liverpool
Simpson clearly won that fight and big terry gave it to Stephen by 5 rounds i was in shock lol
Simpson clearly won that fight and big terry gave it to Stephen by 5 rounds i was in shock lol
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23190
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
There have been thousands. Damean Kelly got a gift in one of his fights. I bet on him to win but had crumpled my slip up and thrown it at the telly. In the Amatuers, there are so many bad ones week in week out. Kids are left heartbroken by truly baffling verdicts.
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
Worst one for was how Michael Brodie got shafted in the fight against Willie Jorrin.
Was a joke and arguably affected Brodie's career beyond repair.
Was a joke and arguably affected Brodie's career beyond repair.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13499
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
First rule of boxing is never be suprised by anything Terry O'Connor does. Second rule of boxing is defend yourselves at all times.billy nelson wrote:Stephen Smith v John Simpson 2 in Liverpool
Simpson clearly won that fight and big terry gave it to Stephen by 5 rounds i was in shock lol
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
Joe Calzaghe 116 - Bernard Hopkins - 111 (Chuck Giampa). When that was read out, I was sure Buffer named the wrong man. Calzaghe by 5 including a 10-8 round going against him - rediculous.
Chuch Giampa has some terrible cards, check them out on this site.
The two 115-112 cards for Froch vs Dirrell were pretty poor also.
Chuch Giampa has some terrible cards, check them out on this site.
The two 115-112 cards for Froch vs Dirrell were pretty poor also.
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
Whittaker v Chavez
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
Great call, more times you watch it the more you can appreciate Chavez's work.... but no way that should have been a draw.Coco wrote:Whittaker v Chavez
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
Not quite the 'worst' scorecard ever but one anomaly that always sticks in my mind was a fight between Cristian Mijares and Jose Navarro in 2008. It appeared that Mijares had won comfortably and the scorecards came back at 115-113, 117-111 both for Mijares and then a remarkable 120-108 to Navarro! Just shows how we can all be watching the fights so differently.
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5520
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
steve689 wrote:Not quite the 'worst' scorecard ever but one anomaly that always sticks in my mind was a fight between Cristian Mijares and Jose Navarro in 2008. It appeared that Mijares had won comfortably and the scorecards came back at 115-113, 117-111 both for Mijares and then a remarkable 120-108 to Navarro! Just shows how we can all be watching the fights so differently.
Unbelievable score that one. I don`t think we can put that down to just different opinion of how a fight has gone. something more sinister has to be at work. If not, then the guy must be banned for utter incompetence.
If i was that bad at my job, I`d be out on my ear.
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
Whittaker/Ramirez ICoco wrote:Whittaker v Chavez
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
Almost as bad as someone who called Calzaghe v Kessler a draw eh stu? Sorry fella just couldn't resist ha hastujones wrote:Joe Calzaghe 116 - Bernard Hopkins - 111 (Chuck Giampa). When that was read out, I was sure Buffer named the wrong man. Calzaghe by 5 including a 10-8 round going against him - rediculous.
Chuch Giampa has some terrible cards, check them out on this site.
The two 115-112 cards for Froch vs Dirrell were pretty poor also.
Re: What are the top three worst scorecards ever
Yep, great call.orbtastic wrote:Whittaker/Ramirez ICoco wrote:Whittaker v Chavez