not really worth a topic...

Post Reply
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Sometimes I swear there's an unwritten code among journalists and researchers that you're allowed to get sportsmen's names wrong, as long as they're boxers.
iftkwoody
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 203
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 03:10

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by iftkwoody »

Lol this reminds me of a story my dad told me of a guy that he had working for him that "claimed" he was a know it all about football and whilst my dad and another guy was talking about man utd he confidently stated that "Brian Briggs" was useless
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by ILikeBeer »

There's a hell of a lot of people that make the mistake of thinking that because boxing is a sport that involves trading physical blows, that any old knob can have an expert opinion on it.

A few years ago, I was in the pub in an evening, and Sky Sports were showing Danny Williams on a Friday Fight Night show. My mate started trying to discuss his thoughts on boxing, despite the fact that he didn't know who Danny Williams was. (This was before he knocked out Tyson). Then, without a hint of irony, he started telling me what he thought the problems with the sport was, using something that happened in one of the Rocky films as an example. :roll:
Tarquin Tarpaulin V
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 68
Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 16:40

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by Tarquin Tarpaulin V »

Come on, give the guy a break. He's talking to boxing fans all of whom would know he means Barry McGuinness :doh:
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by bennie »

I once read a newspaper story in which John Mugabi was spelt John McGarbey; another newspaper spelt Juan Laporte 'Ron' Laporte, which just goes to show that names said over the telephone can laughably mislead.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by n1ebf »

in the Kessler Calzaghe fight ringwalks there's 2 absolute belters. I can't remember both of them but at one point the commentator makes reference to the 5000 Dutch fans that have come to support Kessler....
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26479
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by banjo »

It's not just boxing though that gets misreported on by these experts who know everything about fornicate all, I'm also a big fan of motorcycle road racing and everyone becomes a TT expert when somebody gets killed and try to come across as all moral and take that "disgusted from Tunbridge Wells" tone without ever taking into account that the reason why competitors and spectators love the sport is because it is dangerous and there is a very real chance you could go home in a box. Go and weed your garden you soft twats and leave us to it.

I see lots of ignorance about boxing in the mainstream though, I always counter with the same response - boxing has saved more lives than it has ended.
pablothunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1155
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 07:38

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by pablothunder »

Wasn't Jim Watt once introduced by the MC as Jim Scott from Wattland.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by oliverfennell »

My favourites were David Kane (Haye) and Jim McNeilly referring to Roy Woods and Clinton Jones.

I miss Jim McNeilly, actually...
jtourettes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 826
Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 07:24

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by jtourettes »

ILikeBeer wrote:There's a hell of a lot of people that make the mistake of thinking that because boxing is a sport that involves trading physical blows, that any old knob can have an expert opinion on it.

A few years ago, I was in the pub in an evening, and Sky Sports were showing Danny Williams on a Friday Fight Night show. My mate started trying to discuss his thoughts on boxing, despite the fact that he didn't know who Danny Williams was. (This was before he knocked out Tyson). Then, without a hint of irony, he started telling me what he thought the problems with the sport was, using something that happened in one of the Rocky films as an example. :roll:

Rocky was a documentary mane.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by ILikeBeer »

jtourettes wrote:
Rocky was a documentary mane.
Talking of any old knob.... :roll:
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by ILikeBeer »

There's a show on Channel 5 on the 14th.... I reckon there'll be some blinders by the commentators. :lol:
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by orbtastic »

Riddick Ruddock was my favourite malapropism.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23244
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by handsofstone »

Darren Baker anybody?
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by WelshJack »

Segey Kovalev to be the next superstar of Russian boxing after Golovkin was one of my favourites can't remember who said it though.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4588
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by JC »

oliverfennell wrote:My favourites were David Kane (Haye) and Jim McNeilly referring to Roy Woods and Clinton Jones.

I miss Jim McNeilly, actually...
If you're talking about Jim Neilly that's quite ironic.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by oliverfennell »

handsofstone wrote:Darren Baker anybody?
He was "Darren Barger" on the cover of the local boxing mag here in Thailand.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by oliverfennell »

J-C wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:My favourites were David Kane (Haye) and Jim McNeilly referring to Roy Woods and Clinton Jones.

I miss Jim McNeilly, actually...
If you're talking about Jim Neilly that's quite ironic.
:lol:

So it is!
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: not really worth a topic...

Post by hurlock »

Anthony smells lol!
Post Reply