C5 Card Round by Round

dbflex
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 870
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 12:53

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by dbflex »

Finch wrote:
stevieb_8006 wrote:Fair dos, but Galahad nothing special. If dickens had of done 12 before that could've well been different.
Agreed. Don't see anything to suggest he will go beyond domestic level. Can't see him being a proper world champion and is miles behind Franpton and Quigg.

Meaty Mick will tell us all differently in a minute. Yawn
He's three years younger than Frampton who was a very good amateur, while Quigg turned pro two years before Galahad. So he should be behind those two. Plus they are at world level, he's just won the British title. So they are unfair comparisons, albeit ones he encourages
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by expe »

dbflex wrote:
Finch wrote:
stevieb_8006 wrote:Fair dos, but Galahad nothing special. If dickens had of done 12 before that could've well been different.
Agreed. Don't see anything to suggest he will go beyond domestic level. Can't see him being a proper world champion and is miles behind Franpton and Quigg.

Meaty Mick will tell us all differently in a minute. Yawn
He's three years younger than Frampton who was a very good amateur, while Quigg turned pro two years before Galahad. So he should be behind those two. Plus they are at world level, he's just won the British title. So they are unfair comparisons, albeit ones he encourages
Galahad's 3 years younger, but he turned pro 3 months later and has only had 1 fight less than Frampton.
dbflex
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 870
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 12:53

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by dbflex »

Galahad's 3 years younger, but he turned pro 3 months later and has only had 1 fight less than Frampton.
But Carl was a far better amateur. Imagine there's a few welters who turned pro the same year as Gavin but aren't as advanced.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by expe »

dbflex wrote:
Galahad's 3 years younger, but he turned pro 3 months later and has only had 1 fight less than Frampton.
But Carl was a far better amateur. Imagine there's a few welters who turned pro the same year as Gavin but aren't as advanced.
There are, but that's the fight he wants, for Hennessey to ask whether Frampton will "step up" and fight Galahad is laughable, it would be a big step back.
dbflex
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 870
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 12:53

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by dbflex »

expe wrote:
dbflex wrote:
Galahad's 3 years younger, but he turned pro 3 months later and has only had 1 fight less than Frampton.
But Carl was a far better amateur. Imagine there's a few welters who turned pro the same year as Gavin but aren't as advanced.
There are, but that's the fight he wants, for Hennessey to ask whether Frampton will "step up" and fight Galahad is laughable, it would be a big step back.
Yeah I cringed when he said that. Frampton and Quigg are some distance ahead. Galahad isn't overburdened with potential challengers but Gavin McDonnell may be one.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by Horse »

expe wrote:There are, but that's the fight he wants, for Hennessey to ask whether Frampton will "step up" and fight Galahad is laughable, it would be a big step back.
No, it wouldn't.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by DMA1987 »

Was a bit disappointed with Galahad tonight, which says a lot seeing as he has just stopped Dickens who himself was rated fairly highly. I felt like he didnt do himself justice.

But still a cracking win.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by expe »

Horse wrote:
expe wrote:There are, but that's the fight he wants, for Hennessey to ask whether Frampton will "step up" and fight Galahad is laughable, it would be a big step back.
No, it wouldn't.
From European level and on the brink of a world title fight, to then fight Kid Galahad wouldn't be dropping down a level?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by jameswilson »

What time UK time is the main event set to kick off?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by Horse »

expe wrote:From European level and on the brink of a world title fight, to then fight Kid Galahad wouldn't be dropping down a level?
Is Parodi any better than Galahad?

Galahad would be a good quality opponent for Frampton to defend his European title against.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by DMA1987 »

Horse wrote:
expe wrote:From European level and on the brink of a world title fight, to then fight Kid Galahad wouldn't be dropping down a level?
Galahad would be a good quality opponent for Frampton to defend his European title against.
:TU:
Tom Ford
Super Middleweight
Posts: 358
Joined: 20 Jul 2013, 15:52

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by Tom Ford »

jameswilson wrote:What time UK time is the main event set to kick off?
On C5? It finished ages ago.
ajwesty13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by ajwesty13 »

Dirk Kelly wrote: With the rubbish he was spouting and all those hangers on I couldn't help thinking Prince Naz mark 2!

I was thinking the exact same thing when he Said "boom" is a sort of Naz thing... even the style is a copy of Naz and bit of brook to...

Thought Dickens did himself proud tonight but he was spent .. if he could build up the fitness then Dickens could be fighting for some decent titles..

found it such a difficult fight to score tired to go with gut in the end and had Galahad (bazza) up by just by one round before KO ... was a little perturbed by stoppage until finding out that the corner supposedly pulled him out...

Oh PS did anyone else think that in some parts espcailly movement that Dickens looked pretty hattonesque.... or was that just me :o
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by jameswilson »

Apparently Kelly Swanson has seen some big ones.......
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13499
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by jameswilson »

I had it 97-94 to the Mexican. 6-3 and one even.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by lefty »

ajwesty13 wrote:
Dirk Kelly wrote: With the rubbish he was spouting and all those hangers on I couldn't help thinking Prince Naz mark 2!

I was thinking the exact same thing when he Said "boom" is a sort of Naz thing... even the style is a copy of Naz and bit of brook to...

Thought Dickens did himself proud tonight but he was spent .. if he could build up the fitness then Dickens could be fighting for some decent titles..

found it such a difficult fight to score tired to go with gut in the end and had Galahad (bazza) up by just by one round before KO ... was a little perturbed by stoppage until finding out that the corner supposedly pulled him out...

Oh PS did anyone else think that in some parts espcailly movement that Dickens looked pretty hattonesque.... or was that just me :o
Just you.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by lefty »

jameswilson wrote:Apparently Kelly Swanson has seen some big ones.......
You have something in common then :DD
ajwesty13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by ajwesty13 »

ajwesty13 wrote:
Oh PS did anyone else think that in some parts espcailly movement that Dickens looked pretty hattonesque.... or was that just me :o
columbo wrote: Just you.
Hatton boxed on his toes and would bounce, box and then smother... dickens for me did that in parts ..
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by stevieb_8006 »

ajwesty13 wrote:
ajwesty13 wrote:
Oh PS did anyone else think that in some parts espcailly movement that Dickens looked pretty hattonesque.... or was that just me :o
columbo wrote: Just you.
Hatton boxed on his toes and would bounce, box and then smother... dickens for me did that in parts ..
i thought more paul ingle. galahad was a bit classless not showing dickens much respect after the fight I thought. considering he was giving him fits.
rm1
Middleweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 02 Feb 2013, 11:11

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by rm1 »

Overall a much better effort in terms of production from Channel 5 this time with the exception of the ridiculous actor in the galahad profile.
As for the fighting Eubank looked good but both Galahad and Hughie Fury looked beatable.
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by stevieb_8006 »

rm1 wrote:Overall a much better effort in terms of production from Channel 5 this time with the exception of the ridiculous actor in the galahad profile.
As for the fighting Eubank looked good but both Galahad and Hughie Fury looked beatable.
God that actor was cringeworthy. What were they thinking? There was absolutely no point to it, I'd rather have watched kid Galahad on the pads for ten mins
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by Final round »

Good performance by both fighters and excellent finish by Galahad , I didn't think the Kid had much pop in his gun but Dickens's tank looked completely empty.
Galahad's interview after was abysmal, no respect shown at all for Dickens who'd given him all he could handle.
rm1
Middleweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 02 Feb 2013, 11:11

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by rm1 »

stevieb_8006 wrote:
rm1 wrote:Overall a much better effort in terms of production from Channel 5 this time with the exception of the ridiculous actor in the galahad profile.
As for the fighting Eubank looked good but both Galahad and Hughie Fury looked beatable.
God that actor was cringeworthy. What were they thinking? There was absolutely no point to it, I'd rather have watched kid Galahad on the pads for ten mins
exactly and they had to pay extra for it so it was worse than pointless otherwise a much better effort than the previous show they put on though.
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by stevieb_8006 »

Final round wrote:Good performance by both fighters and excellent finish by Galahad , I didn't think the Kid had much pop in his gun but Dickens's tank looked completely empty.
Galahad's interview after was abysmal, no respect shown at all for Dickens who'd given him all he could handle.
Yeah, I don't know why the ingle fighters STILL feel the need to copy hameds banter. It's just embarrassing. Even Dom looked tired and embarrassed by it. Saying that, at least Naz had a slight sense of his own ridiculousness, even he would have given respect for such a gallant effort.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: C5 Card Round by Round

Post by earsjohn »

Finch wrote:
stevieb_8006 wrote:Fair dos, but Galahad nothing special. If dickens had of done 12 before that could've well been different.
Agreed. Don't see anything to suggest he will go beyond domestic level. Can't see him being a proper world champion and is miles behind Franpton and Quigg.

Meaty Mick will tell us all differently in a minute. Yawn
:roll:

Yep. He might as well give up the game now. He's a hopeless bum who will be shown up when he fights someone better than him. It's a joke that he should even consider carrying on.
Post Reply