It strikes me as a good idea that when you have 3 judges scoring a fight , when 2 agree on the score, then that becomes the official score That is if the judges score round 1 9-10, 9-10, 10-9 , then the official score is 9-10.
This means that at least 2 judges would have agreed on the score and that would exclude a judge whose clearly not at the same fight as the others !!!
I wonder how the Burns fight would have ended with this system ?? Perhps 'fights collector ' might know ??
dalcumly wrote:It strikes me as a good idea that when you have 3 judges scoring a fight , when 2 agree on the score, then that becomes the official score That is if the judges score round 1 9-10, 9-10, 10-9 , then the official score is 9-10.
This means that at least 2 judges would have agreed on the score and that would exclude a judge whose clearly not at the same fight as the others !!!
I wonder how the Burns fight would have ended with this system ?? Perhps 'fights collector ' might know ??
The boxing world needs it. It's not even the rare decision, it's clear as mud decisions that even my mates who hardly EVER watch boxing say, Floyd won nearly every round.
It's as bad as the ball going 10 yards wide in foote and the ref giving a goal, it's ridiculous when no one can agree. There needs to be disciplinary action. The judge who can theophane the win was as ridiculous. The list is endless