wlvrne wrote:You need a life if this is how you get your jollies, silkov.
Is that the best you can do?..
.. try again!... 8) 
Why is there so much smack talk amongst boxing fans?
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
No, it sounds like our religous and political views are MUCH closer than our views on boxing.theone wrote:You made me spill hot coffee out my nose when i read this, very funny. Im an atheist semi liberal; will that be an issue?Actually, I think we might have to avoid discussing boxing and stick with something less controversial, like politics or religion.
this
If I'm so boring, why bother replying? And you are one sad, strange, little person if this is how you amuse yourself by trying to get on someone's nerves, and then to cry about it to other readers when you get insulted in return.
And I say again, you are the poster-boy for what KOJOE says about posters like you.
And I say again, you are the poster-boy for what KOJOE says about posters like you.
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: this
wlvrne wrote:If I'm so boring, why bother replying? And you are one sad, strange, little person if this is how you amuse yourself by trying to get on someone's nerves, and then to cry about it to other readers when you get insulted in return.
And I say again, you are the poster-boy for what KOJOE says about posters like you.
Surely you can't be talking about Silkov? The guy who claims he brings humour and knowledge to Boxrec? The guy who believes his opinions should be treated as holy writ?
Last edited by Collins2000 on 10 Nov 2005, 18:16, edited 1 time in total.
-
tiredoldngrey
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 442
- Joined: 23 May 2005, 12:36
This board and the ask the trainer board at saddo are where I spend all my time. Very knowledgeable group of boxing fans here, in terms of the history of the sport but also in terms of what indiviual fighters were good at in the ring and what they were susceptible to aas well.
It seems to me that most times there is consideration and respect shown even among those that disagree, even if it is heatedly so, and I attribute that to the fact that 9 of 10 times the debaters are both arguing from a solid base
It seems to me that most times there is consideration and respect shown even among those that disagree, even if it is heatedly so, and I attribute that to the fact that 9 of 10 times the debaters are both arguing from a solid base
re
>>>I don't see you denigrating them here for talking about something 6 years old<<<
Well genius, none of the rest have pm’d me, and none of the rest have whine about it like you have either!
>>>And finally, isn't this forum about opinions? I don't recall making accusations<<<
It’s all about opinions, but if you cannot recall making the accusation that I was a hypocrite in this very thread, then you have far more problems than I suspect!
>>>And Barry, so what if I "jumped the gun"?<<<
As you so easily proved, it is better to be certain, or at least pretty damn certain, or else you will just end up looking like someone that is trying to stir something up, or someone that it just a complete idiot…you can choose whatever you want to be!
>>>I've been sucked into some name-calling threads myself, but only after someone has fired at me first.<<<<
Well how do you explain the Stacy thread, or for that mater how do you explain this thread because I don’t recall ever mentioning your name in my first response, but you accuse me in your first thread, so how did I strike you first? Kind of lost for words on that aren’t you? Don’t try to play all holier than thou, most already know you and anyone that can post 2000+ posts in less than four months, well the term bullshit comes to mind and in big quantities!
>>>Ok Silkov, just like Barry, you tend to focus on the side issues and not the main topic.<<<
So what is the main topic there Aristotle? Enlighten us all with your depth of reasoning!
Well genius, none of the rest have pm’d me, and none of the rest have whine about it like you have either!
>>>And finally, isn't this forum about opinions? I don't recall making accusations<<<
It’s all about opinions, but if you cannot recall making the accusation that I was a hypocrite in this very thread, then you have far more problems than I suspect!
>>>And Barry, so what if I "jumped the gun"?<<<
As you so easily proved, it is better to be certain, or at least pretty damn certain, or else you will just end up looking like someone that is trying to stir something up, or someone that it just a complete idiot…you can choose whatever you want to be!
>>>I've been sucked into some name-calling threads myself, but only after someone has fired at me first.<<<<
Well how do you explain the Stacy thread, or for that mater how do you explain this thread because I don’t recall ever mentioning your name in my first response, but you accuse me in your first thread, so how did I strike you first? Kind of lost for words on that aren’t you? Don’t try to play all holier than thou, most already know you and anyone that can post 2000+ posts in less than four months, well the term bullshit comes to mind and in big quantities!
>>>Ok Silkov, just like Barry, you tend to focus on the side issues and not the main topic.<<<
So what is the main topic there Aristotle? Enlighten us all with your depth of reasoning!
this
No Barry, I'm not at all at a loss for words.
You are a hypocrite in that you're on here talking about poster calling others names, when I've seen you do this time and again.
And you try to twist things again. I didn't say you struck first. And on here, I didn't insult you first. Unless to you having someone else point out your hypocrisy is insulting to you.
And you say I whined to you in PM? No, I didn't. You asked why I would bring up a subject that was 6 years old. I explained it twice in the threads and when that didn't sink into your biased brain, I thiought I'd PM you to save the other posters the trouble of me trying to explain something to you, when you obviously won't listen.
Unlike you Barry, I do acknowledge when I'm wrong. Unlike you Barry, I do apologize when I've BEEN in the wrong. And unlike you Barry, I do listen to both sides of the argument.
I don't try to distract from the main issues like you and Silkov do.
You are a hypocrite in that you're on here talking about poster calling others names, when I've seen you do this time and again.
And you try to twist things again. I didn't say you struck first. And on here, I didn't insult you first. Unless to you having someone else point out your hypocrisy is insulting to you.
And you say I whined to you in PM? No, I didn't. You asked why I would bring up a subject that was 6 years old. I explained it twice in the threads and when that didn't sink into your biased brain, I thiought I'd PM you to save the other posters the trouble of me trying to explain something to you, when you obviously won't listen.
Unlike you Barry, I do acknowledge when I'm wrong. Unlike you Barry, I do apologize when I've BEEN in the wrong. And unlike you Barry, I do listen to both sides of the argument.
I don't try to distract from the main issues like you and Silkov do.
re
>>>You are a hypocrite in that you're on here talking about poster calling others names, when I've seen you do this time and again.<<<
O-kay little boy, I challenge you again…go back and show me where I have ever stated that I do not talk shit to others…show me…prove me wrong, show me that I am a hypocrite who talks shit and then pretends not to…problem is…you can’t. Hell, I’m still waiting for you to go back and show me where I have just started insulting someone else without any merit…you still haven’t done that wise-ass, so why don’t you put those research abilities that you talked about earlier to work and show me proof of those two statements…do it little boy…or are you scared? Actually you may have a little sense and realize that it would be a complete waste of time because you won’t find what wish you could! You’re not only dense, but a sore loser as well and most certainly someone who is suffering from delusions!
>>>And you try to twist things again. I didn't say you struck first. And on here, I didn't insult you first. Unless to you having someone else point out your hypocrisy is insulting to you.<<<
Whenever someone makes a claim that is incorrect it is insulting, should be to anyone unless they’re an idiot, but like I said above, prove my hypocrisy little boy and if you can’t then shut the fornicate up because all your doing is making yourself out to look even more clueless than you really may be. Is it a lack of being hugged by your parents?
>>>And you say I whined to you in PM? No, I didn't. You asked why I would bring up a subject that was 6 years old. I explained it twice in the threads and when that didn't sink into your biased brain, I thiought I'd PM you to save the other posters the trouble of me trying to explain something to you, when you obviously won't listen. <<<
Like I said, someone that has 2000+ posts in less than 4 months could care less about wasting space on the message board, so like your little holier than thou act, it doesn’t work and to continue with it would only put you in the level of Gump…Gumperine!
>>>Unlike you Barry, I do acknowledge when I'm wrong. Unlike you Barry, I do apologize when I've BEEN in the wrong. And unlike you Barry, I do listen to both sides of the argument.
I don't try to distract from the main issues like you and Silkov do<<<
Let me see boy, I have seen you apologize twice in all, but you have been wrong a lot more and to again shove your bullshit right back in your face, go back on your own thread where you criticized Stacy without merit and look up my apology to Stacy…so you see boy, I do apologize not only when I have been wrong, but even when I just think I may have been wrong! As usual you are completely wrong again…you’re just making things worse for yourself with each stupid remark ands post you make, but I encourage you to continue on because I could get a real kick about of making you look like, well I don’t even have to say any names, you make everything about yourself crystal clear without any help!
Above everything mentioned, prove me wrong little boy…stop just yapping it and actually prove it because your words are as empty as your head without any evidence to prove it, so there you have been challenged, go back and bring up the proof that I am a hypocrite and bring up proof that I have attacked others without being provoked first…so will you rise to the occasion, or will you shriek away like a little girl?
O-kay little boy, I challenge you again…go back and show me where I have ever stated that I do not talk shit to others…show me…prove me wrong, show me that I am a hypocrite who talks shit and then pretends not to…problem is…you can’t. Hell, I’m still waiting for you to go back and show me where I have just started insulting someone else without any merit…you still haven’t done that wise-ass, so why don’t you put those research abilities that you talked about earlier to work and show me proof of those two statements…do it little boy…or are you scared? Actually you may have a little sense and realize that it would be a complete waste of time because you won’t find what wish you could! You’re not only dense, but a sore loser as well and most certainly someone who is suffering from delusions!
>>>And you try to twist things again. I didn't say you struck first. And on here, I didn't insult you first. Unless to you having someone else point out your hypocrisy is insulting to you.<<<
Whenever someone makes a claim that is incorrect it is insulting, should be to anyone unless they’re an idiot, but like I said above, prove my hypocrisy little boy and if you can’t then shut the fornicate up because all your doing is making yourself out to look even more clueless than you really may be. Is it a lack of being hugged by your parents?
>>>And you say I whined to you in PM? No, I didn't. You asked why I would bring up a subject that was 6 years old. I explained it twice in the threads and when that didn't sink into your biased brain, I thiought I'd PM you to save the other posters the trouble of me trying to explain something to you, when you obviously won't listen. <<<
Like I said, someone that has 2000+ posts in less than 4 months could care less about wasting space on the message board, so like your little holier than thou act, it doesn’t work and to continue with it would only put you in the level of Gump…Gumperine!
>>>Unlike you Barry, I do acknowledge when I'm wrong. Unlike you Barry, I do apologize when I've BEEN in the wrong. And unlike you Barry, I do listen to both sides of the argument.
I don't try to distract from the main issues like you and Silkov do<<<
Let me see boy, I have seen you apologize twice in all, but you have been wrong a lot more and to again shove your bullshit right back in your face, go back on your own thread where you criticized Stacy without merit and look up my apology to Stacy…so you see boy, I do apologize not only when I have been wrong, but even when I just think I may have been wrong! As usual you are completely wrong again…you’re just making things worse for yourself with each stupid remark ands post you make, but I encourage you to continue on because I could get a real kick about of making you look like, well I don’t even have to say any names, you make everything about yourself crystal clear without any help!
Above everything mentioned, prove me wrong little boy…stop just yapping it and actually prove it because your words are as empty as your head without any evidence to prove it, so there you have been challenged, go back and bring up the proof that I am a hypocrite and bring up proof that I have attacked others without being provoked first…so will you rise to the occasion, or will you shriek away like a little girl?
this
Decagon, I agree with you. And I've said before, I agree with what KOJOE and "pound for pound" has written.
I've caught some flack for stating that I don't insult unless I'm insulted first. I expected some heat from that, but more in the nature of ribbing and not these heated exchanges with Barry, and more annoying ones with Silkov. Goes with the territory.
I guess Barry's more pissed that I pointed out he's one of the more vociferous name-callers on here. I seem to have incurred his wrath.
I've caught some flack for stating that I don't insult unless I'm insulted first. I expected some heat from that, but more in the nature of ribbing and not these heated exchanges with Barry, and more annoying ones with Silkov. Goes with the territory.
I guess Barry's more pissed that I pointed out he's one of the more vociferous name-callers on here. I seem to have incurred his wrath.
re
>>>Just to echo what some others have said, it's not about boxing; it's about the anonymity of the internet. Go to a political forum, a classic cars forum or even a Barbie forum and you'll see the same thing.<<<
Your right, anywhere there is a moderate level of testosterone, there will be abusive language and cursing one another...except I'd be willing to bet that it doesn't go on at websites about little puppy dogs...it doesn't happen there does it wlvrne?
Your right, anywhere there is a moderate level of testosterone, there will be abusive language and cursing one another...except I'd be willing to bet that it doesn't go on at websites about little puppy dogs...it doesn't happen there does it wlvrne?
re
>>>I expected some heat from that, but more in the nature of ribbing and not these heated exchanges with Barry<<<
Well perhaps next time you will think before making accusations, which the accusations are not as bad as you trying act Pope-like in your actions...as I pointed was complete bullshit as you went right after Stacy.
But again, for about the thenth time, prove your points about me and after you can't be a man and quit crying about it, but if you can do nothing but yap incoherently, then your wasting everyone's time!
Well perhaps next time you will think before making accusations, which the accusations are not as bad as you trying act Pope-like in your actions...as I pointed was complete bullshit as you went right after Stacy.
But again, for about the thenth time, prove your points about me and after you can't be a man and quit crying about it, but if you can do nothing but yap incoherently, then your wasting everyone's time!
this
Barry, you are as easy to bait as AC is. And for the "umpteenth" time, I did not insult AC in that thread. Get personal?....yes I did. Why?...because he rants about freedoms while depriving others their own.
Should I have?...maybe not. Can others do that with me?....Sure, it's called freedom of expression. But to call that thread a "first-strike insult" is off base. A good example of a first strike insult would be for a poster to jump all over and insult another for no reason whatsoever, other than for just to do it. I've seen it in here to other posters, and you have seen it too.
As for crying, you Barry, seem to be crying the loudest here. Need some milk?
Should I have?...maybe not. Can others do that with me?....Sure, it's called freedom of expression. But to call that thread a "first-strike insult" is off base. A good example of a first strike insult would be for a poster to jump all over and insult another for no reason whatsoever, other than for just to do it. I've seen it in here to other posters, and you have seen it too.
As for crying, you Barry, seem to be crying the loudest here. Need some milk?
insults
Wlvrne wrote:">>Exactly what KOJOE says. And Barry's a bit hypocritical on this subject, as I've seen him insult some posters without any real warrant. I, too, have been called some pretty vile stuff. It's only when I'm insulted first will I fire back.
Face to face, a poster/reader is less apt to hurl insults around. On the internet, people feel anonymous and don't think twice about cutting someone down just to see their own cut-downs in print and make themselves feel good."<<
I've said I've seen you insult others without ANY REAL WARRANT. That's a subjective statement and open to interpretation. I've seen you jump all over Stacy's case before with your own diatribes.
Face to face, a poster/reader is less apt to hurl insults around. On the internet, people feel anonymous and don't think twice about cutting someone down just to see their own cut-downs in print and make themselves feel good."<<
I've said I've seen you insult others without ANY REAL WARRANT. That's a subjective statement and open to interpretation. I've seen you jump all over Stacy's case before with your own diatribes.
re
>>>Barry, you are as easy to bait as AC is. And for the "umpteenth" time, I did not insult AC in that thread. Get personal?....yes I did. Why?...because he rants about freedoms while depriving others their own. Should I have?...maybe not. Can others do that with me?....Sure, it's called freedom of expression. But to call that thread a "first-strike insult" is off base. <<<
Tell you what…why don’t we ask Stacy and see what he says, see if he was insulted by your selfish little rant! As far as calling him a hypocrite, I have done it many times, but it has always been about his boxing views and it has always been about boxing, unless he makes a family reference of which I return, but it rarely ever serious on my part, I don’t know about Stacy…but instead of using his boxing views, as I do, you brought his personal life into it because that’s all you could do, all that you had the ability to do and it was not only wrong, but a completely, little pussy-ass, punk thing to do of which I think just about everyone that read it was in agreement with and one I guarantee that someone like you would only do behind a computer screen under your assumed name.
It takes a real low-life to bring someone’s personal past into something which is not the persons business to begin with and I can promise you right now, if you ever do anything like it again, you can kiss your spot in the forum goodbye because that kind of bullshit will not be tolerated. Call people all the names you want and avoid all challenges in any manner you choose, but try bringing someone’s personal business up again and see how long you remain a member of the forum!
And again, you seem to be avoiding the challenge, but that doesn’t surprise me as you seem to avoid the issue like a plague. You can stop with your pm’s because you’re not offering anything different than you present here, so I’ll tell you now…it will just be a waste of time because I’m not going to read any more and unless you can actually prove anything that you have mentioned about me, then I’m done with you on this thread because I have far better things to do than talk back and fourth with a poser/fake that cannot back up one thing they say with any kind of actual fact, or proof!
Tell you what…why don’t we ask Stacy and see what he says, see if he was insulted by your selfish little rant! As far as calling him a hypocrite, I have done it many times, but it has always been about his boxing views and it has always been about boxing, unless he makes a family reference of which I return, but it rarely ever serious on my part, I don’t know about Stacy…but instead of using his boxing views, as I do, you brought his personal life into it because that’s all you could do, all that you had the ability to do and it was not only wrong, but a completely, little pussy-ass, punk thing to do of which I think just about everyone that read it was in agreement with and one I guarantee that someone like you would only do behind a computer screen under your assumed name.
It takes a real low-life to bring someone’s personal past into something which is not the persons business to begin with and I can promise you right now, if you ever do anything like it again, you can kiss your spot in the forum goodbye because that kind of bullshit will not be tolerated. Call people all the names you want and avoid all challenges in any manner you choose, but try bringing someone’s personal business up again and see how long you remain a member of the forum!
And again, you seem to be avoiding the challenge, but that doesn’t surprise me as you seem to avoid the issue like a plague. You can stop with your pm’s because you’re not offering anything different than you present here, so I’ll tell you now…it will just be a waste of time because I’m not going to read any more and unless you can actually prove anything that you have mentioned about me, then I’m done with you on this thread because I have far better things to do than talk back and fourth with a poser/fake that cannot back up one thing they say with any kind of actual fact, or proof!
-
wolverine1
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 102
- Joined: 11 Nov 2005, 05:30
this
It might seem as if I have no reply for this. Truth is, I've been locked out.
-
wolverine1
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 102
- Joined: 11 Nov 2005, 05:30
this
Wlvrne wrote:">>Exactly what KOJOE says. And Barry's a bit hypocritical on this subject, as I've seen him insult some posters without any real warrant. I, too, have been called some pretty vile stuff. It's only when I'm insulted first will I fire back.
Face to face, a poster/reader is less apt to hurl insults around. On the internet, people feel anonymous and don't think twice about cutting someone down just to see their own cut-downs in print and make themselves feel good."<<
I've said I've seen you insult others without ANY REAL WARRANT. That's a subjective statement and open to interpretation. I've seen you jump all over Stacy's case before with your own diatribes<<
.This is all I need to say about your "so-called" challenge. And every reader on the forum knows how insulting to others you can be.
And if Stacy WAS insulted by my thread, then he shouldn't rant and rave about people tryng to take away his personal freedoms while depriving others their own.
And if I sound like I'm repeating myself here and in PM it's so others can see how I do explain things to you, yet like a small child, you refuse to acknowledge the evidence in front of you.
Face to face, a poster/reader is less apt to hurl insults around. On the internet, people feel anonymous and don't think twice about cutting someone down just to see their own cut-downs in print and make themselves feel good."<<
I've said I've seen you insult others without ANY REAL WARRANT. That's a subjective statement and open to interpretation. I've seen you jump all over Stacy's case before with your own diatribes<<
.This is all I need to say about your "so-called" challenge. And every reader on the forum knows how insulting to others you can be.
And if Stacy WAS insulted by my thread, then he shouldn't rant and rave about people tryng to take away his personal freedoms while depriving others their own.
And if I sound like I'm repeating myself here and in PM it's so others can see how I do explain things to you, yet like a small child, you refuse to acknowledge the evidence in front of you.
-
wolverine1
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 102
- Joined: 11 Nov 2005, 05:30
this
Did I whine? Or is it more of a case of you putting something into someone's words?
And since I could not post a speedy retort to your own rant, I figured I got locked out.
And Barry, why would I get locked out? The only one on this board who would seek to do such a lowly act would be you.
And since I could not post a speedy retort to your own rant, I figured I got locked out.
And Barry, why would I get locked out? The only one on this board who would seek to do such a lowly act would be you.
-
wolverine1
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 102
- Joined: 11 Nov 2005, 05:30
this
I'm going to bed now, folks. That's just so you all know for when Barry posts on here again and I don't have a snappy come-back. It won't be because he got the last word or that he shut me up on this, it's just because I'm putting this down for now and will check back in again.
Re: this
Yeh, go and cuddle your teddybear you little prick... 8)wolverine1 wrote:I'm going to bed now, folks. That's just so you all know for when Barry posts on here again and I don't have a snappy come-back. It won't be because he got the last word or that he shut me up on this, it's just because I'm putting this down for now and will check back in again.
.-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: this
Silky, is this an example of your humour? Or maybe your wife is back on here posting as you?silkov wrote:Yeh, go and cuddle your teddybear you little prick... 8)wolverine1 wrote:I'm going to bed now, folks. That's just so you all know for when Barry posts on here again and I don't have a snappy come-back. It won't be because he got the last word or that he shut me up on this, it's just because I'm putting this down for now and will check back in again.