Smith v fielding

Post Reply
prjm80
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17
Joined: 24 Oct 2009, 14:45

Smith v fielding

Post by prjm80 »

Should be a cracker
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by lefty »

This could be getting carried with the hype but the way Smith is looking I see him knocking fielding out.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by Hagler2002 »

Smith would win easy IMO.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by lefty »

The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Tom Ford
Super Middleweight
Posts: 358
Joined: 20 Jul 2013, 15:52

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by Tom Ford »

columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
As advertised.
Fortynineandout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by Fortynineandout »

Sooner or later Fielding has to step out of his comfort zone and fight a credible opponent.
The weight difference tonight was clear to see .
His opponent didn't look like a genuine super middle and fielding struggled to make the weight ? Easy nights work but an embarrassing match up for me.

Luke Blackledge has been calling him out for ages- as soon as Dodson pulled out he was putting himself forward at short notice but was avoided for the easy option.
There are good fights to be made and then we can see how good he is.
Last edited by Fortynineandout on 21 Sep 2013, 19:04, edited 1 time in total.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by DMA1987 »

columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Take it you didn't watch the fight?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by lefty »

DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Take it you didn't watch the fight?
Im watching the show from the copperbox and recording the sky show. Why, am I wrong then?
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by Andrew »

Luke Blackledge won't be a walkover for Smith he held his own in Denmark, he loves a fight and will go to war with Smith.

Being honest I still wouldn't be suprised if Smith v Fielding happened for one reason.........money. It would be a big fight in Liverpool and at the echo arena I can't see any fight that would make Paul more money now.

He's at the back end of his career and will want to earn as much as he can before he bows out.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by lefty »

Naandrew wrote:Luke Blackledge won't be a walkover for Smith he held his own in Denmark, he loves a fight and will go to war with Smith.

Being honest I still wouldn't be suprised if Smith v Fielding happened for one reason.........money. It would be a big fight in Liverpool and at the echo arena I can't see any fight that would make Paul more money now.

He's at the back end of his career and will want to earn as much as he can before he bows out.
Is this thread about Paul or Callum? Haha.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by expe »

columbo wrote:
Naandrew wrote:Luke Blackledge won't be a walkover for Smith he held his own in Denmark, he loves a fight and will go to war with Smith.

Being honest I still wouldn't be suprised if Smith v Fielding happened for one reason.........money. It would be a big fight in Liverpool and at the echo arena I can't see any fight that would make Paul more money now.

He's at the back end of his career and will want to earn as much as he can before he bows out.
Is this thread about Paul or Callum? Haha.
Different people are talking about both.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by DMA1987 »

columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Take it you didn't watch the fight?
Im watching the show from the copperbox and recording the sky show. Why, am I wrong then?
You are an Oracle.
prjm80
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17
Joined: 24 Oct 2009, 14:45

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by prjm80 »

Sorry the original post was about callum
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by lefty »

columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Take it you didn't watch the fight?
Im watching the show from the copperbox and recording the sky show. Why, am I wrong then?
You are an Oracle.[/quote]

Nicest adjective ive ever had :lol:
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by n1ebf »

oracle isn't an adjective. I've never heard of a boxer described as utter dog turd on Boxrec before. What a respectful way of putting it.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

It sounded to me last night that Fielding wants no part of Smigga,i could be wrong..
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by mickey1975 »

Blackledge is not to be overlooked.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by hurlock »

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:It sounded to me last night that Fielding wants no part of Smigga,i could be wrong..
Either did oliver Harrison & when they mentioned Callum he never looked interested & look worried saying he was happy to defend his commonwealth.
They don't seem confident at all rocky seems a nice kid but that won't get him far he would like to face Dodson to see where he is at.
I would much rather face Paul then Callum!! He holds the Lonsdale & I don't see him greater then domestic level at 12 st as for Callum the lad could fight for the British with in being a pro inside a year which to me says alot for his potential!!
stesmith22
Middleweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 26 Sep 2013, 07:09

Re: Smith v fielding

Post by stesmith22 »

paul would win easy he is at a higher level
would love frankie gavin to fight kid gahie me thoughts ?
Post Reply