Klitschko - Povetkin + undercard bout

For RBR threads only
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Klitschko - Povetkin + undercard bout

Post by Freedom2013 »

gilgamesh wrote:Wladimir won every round on the cards. Despite bitter fan reaction. When you shutout one of your top contenders 12 rounds to 0. I mean...that speaks for itself. Haters can just suck it.
:TU:

And they can hate all they want, because Wladimir "Money" Klitschko has his $17.5 million dollar payday.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13111
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Klitschko - Povetkin + undercard bout

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

gilgamesh wrote:I repeat NOBODY gets DQ'ed for Holding. If someone were to be DQ'ed for holding I would consider that a robbery personally.

The only time I believe I've ever seen it was when Jesse Ferguson was DQ'ed against Mike Tyson because he was holding and he wouldn't let go, even when the referee was physically trying to separate them.
Henry Akinwande vs Lennox?
bigznyc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 52
Joined: 14 Jan 2006, 22:41

Re: Klitschko - Povetkin + undercard bout

Post by bigznyc »

gilgamesh wrote:
bigznyc wrote:should have been dqed for holding...first round was worthy of point deduction already
Nobody ever gets DQ'ed for holding.
Henry Akinwande LOL..hmm Im right LOL
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Klitschko - Povetkin + undercard bout

Post by gilgamesh »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I repeat NOBODY gets DQ'ed for Holding. If someone were to be DQ'ed for holding I would consider that a robbery personally.

The only time I believe I've ever seen it was when Jesse Ferguson was DQ'ed against Mike Tyson because he was holding and he wouldn't let go, even when the referee was physically trying to separate them.
Henry Akinwande vs Lennox?
I never saw that one. What happened?
bigznyc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 52
Joined: 14 Jan 2006, 22:41

Re: Klitschko - Povetkin + undercard bout

Post by bigznyc »

gilgamesh wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I repeat NOBODY gets DQ'ed for Holding. If someone were to be DQ'ed for holding I would consider that a robbery personally.

The only time I believe I've ever seen it was when Jesse Ferguson was DQ'ed against Mike Tyson because he was holding and he wouldn't let go, even when the referee was physically trying to separate them.
Henry Akinwande vs Lennox?
I never saw that one. What happened?
held him and got dq'd..what do you think happens after point 2 deduction
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Klitschko - Povetkin + undercard bout

Post by gilgamesh »

bigznyc wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
I never saw that one. What happened?
held him and got dq'd..what do you think happens after point 2 deduction
So it was just holding? Not Holding and refusing to let go? Alright then.

Still doesn't change the fact Wlad shouldn't have been DQ'ed. He never received a warning for holding or a point deduction for holding.
conan_the_cribber
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8462
Joined: 03 Jan 2005, 19:11

Re: Klitschko - Povetkin + undercard bout

Post by conan_the_cribber »

One thing. Potvekin copped a lot of flack for not taking his mandatory when he had the chance. And then his trainer saying "he wasnt ready". But he earned respect for today's performance. He tried hard the whole fight and came up from a 3KD round and was still trying with 2:59 on the clock of the 12th round.

Good stuff.
Post Reply