Cotto vs Rodriguez

For RBR threads only
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

The undercard Klimov vs Crawford is about to start now.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

Crawford wins the 1st.. no question.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

Definitely
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

10-9 crawford
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

This is one of those fights that won't put my new score sheet to the test.

Klimov did a little better in the 2nd, I guess.

Crawford 20-18
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

20-18 Crawford
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

The Provoglodyte
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

Yep. Crawford is another one of those guys in that it's absolutely essential that the other guy comes to brawl to make it entertaining in any way. In a boxing match it'll be a dull fight every time.

Crawford is clearly very skilled though. Doubtful Klimov wins a round here.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

Crawford again.. 30-27
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

Cotto looking soggier than usual.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

The boo birds suck

30-27 Crawford
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

yawn
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17241
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Baby Face Finster »

I admire the skill of Crawford but this is one boring fight and not bound to do him any favours. Thank god this is only 10 rounds.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

40-36 Crawford

I don't get why people do not enjoy watching a crawford work.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

Tanzio wrote:The boo birds suck

30-27 Crawford
I totally get it. Crawford bores the sh*t out of me...I realize the irony of this comment when I'm one of the few defending Wlad's performance today :lol: , which was clearly more boring. But at least there's something at stake when Wlad fights.

Crawford I'm always just like "Meh whatever"...I know he'll probably be a top guy in the years to come.

But right now with these fights that should be on ESPN I don't give a sh*t.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

Closer round but

50-45 Crawford
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:The boo birds suck

30-27 Crawford
I totally get it. Crawford bores the sh*t out of me...I realize the irony of this comment when I'm one of the few defending Wlad's performance today :lol: , which was clearly more boring. But at least there's something at stake when Wlad fights.

Crawford I'm always just like "Meh whatever"...I know he'll probably be a top guy in the years to come.

But right now with these fights that should be on ESPN I don't give a sh*t.
Klimov is undefeated
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

I didnt see Klimov do a damn thing in the 5th.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

Tanzio wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:The boo birds suck

30-27 Crawford
I totally get it. Crawford bores the sh*t out of me...I realize the irony of this comment when I'm one of the few defending Wlad's performance today :lol: , which was clearly more boring. But at least there's something at stake when Wlad fights.

Crawford I'm always just like "Meh whatever"...I know he'll probably be a top guy in the years to come.

But right now with these fights that should be on ESPN I don't give a sh*t.
Klimov is undefeated
So?

So is David Rodriguez.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

Wait a minute, that was a clear KD this morning.

60-54 Crawford
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

70-63 Crawford
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by diddy »

Crawford is an excellent boxer.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
I totally get it. Crawford bores the sh*t out of me...I realize the irony of this comment when I'm one of the few defending Wlad's performance today :lol: , which was clearly more boring. But at least there's something at stake when Wlad fights.

Crawford I'm always just like "Meh whatever"...I know he'll probably be a top guy in the years to come.

But right now with these fights that should be on ESPN I don't give a sh*t.
Klimov is undefeated
So?

So is David Rodriguez.
And he is a good night of work.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

Klimov did OK that round.. not sure he won it, but landed a few nice shots.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

80-72 Crawford, but Klimov did land a couple of decent shots.
Post Reply