Cotto vs Rodriguez
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Cotto not warming up?
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
90-81 Crawford
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
100-90 crawford
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Code: Select all
# Winner Deductions Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Crawford [***]
2 Crawford [** ]
3 Crawford [***]
4 Crawford [***]
5 Crawford [***]
6 Crawford [***]
7 Crawford [***]
8 Crawford [* ]
9 Crawford [***]
10 Crawford [***]
11 [ ]
12 [ ]
Final Scorecard
Crawford 100-90
Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [ ] rounds)
Crawford 100-90 to Crawford 100-90
Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [ ] and [* ] rounds)
Crawford 100-90 to Crawford 99-91
Total Star Count (minus pt deductions) (Who "felt" like the winner)
Crawford 27 | Klimov 0
Confidence Scale
------------------
[***] - Impossible to score it differently. Usually the loser gets hurt or does basically nothing.
[** ] - Definite reach to score it differently.
[* ] - Arguable, but a likely score.
[ ] - Could've went to either fighter or scored even.
MPD = Mandatory point deductions (knockdown, penalty).
NMPD = Non-mandatory point deductions.Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Glad that sh*t's over. I didn't even care to watch most of the bout.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
No doubt Cotto vs Rodriguez will be the most exciting bout of the day 
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.JCS wrote:Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
For christ sake, it's almost midnight.... let's delay this BS some more.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Was more entertaining than this fight simply because it was for the Heavyweight Championship of the World. This fight sucked and meant very little. Enough talk about it.Tanzio wrote:He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.JCS wrote:Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Cotto vs Rodriguez coming up. Certainly going to be the best fight of the day.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Cotto - what's not to like . . . and I like Rodriguez too.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
WAR MIGUEL!!! 
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Holy Tecate girl on the right. Delicious.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Your wet dream sucked today. Embarrassed himself. Utterly putrid.gilgamesh wrote:Was more entertaining than this fight simply because it was for the Heavyweight Championship of the World. This fight sucked and meant very little. Enough talk about it.Tanzio wrote:He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.JCS wrote:
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.
Cotto vs Rodriguez coming up. Certainly going to be the best fight of the day.
Crawford vs Klimov was a superior boxing match.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
90 seconds in....Rodriguez has no chance in this fight.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17238
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
This first round already had more excitement than all 10 rounds of Crawford-Klimov combined.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Clear 1st round for Cotto.
10-9 Cotto
10-9 Cotto
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Round 1 = 10-9 Cotto . . . he is looking crisp so far.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Crawford-Klimov and Wlad-Povetkin combinedBaby Face Finster wrote:This first round already had more excitement than all 10 rounds of Crawford-Klimov combined.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Will be surprised if Rodriguez makes it more than halfway through this fight.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Rodriguez just got hit with a sonic boom at the end of the round.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Cotto's looking tremendous through 2 rounds. Showing he's on a level that Rodriguez has never seen.
Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Round 2 = 10-9 Cotto (20-18). Cotto looking clean tonight, severe.