Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
-
iamasadlittleboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05
Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
Story from Japan is that HH is willing to travel to our shores for a fight with Quigg, how'd we see it going?
Re: Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
Why have you posted that?columbo wrote:I give you http://www.BS.com/salinas-inju ... oms--70401
Re: Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
Isnt it obvious? If not im disappointed in you.Horse wrote:Why have you posted that?columbo wrote:I give you http://www.BS.com/salinas-inju ... oms--70401
Re: Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
I do feel for Scott Quigg - he must cringe inside when he is referred to as World Champion.
Re: Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
Explain yourself.columbo wrote:Isnt it obvious? If not im disappointed in you.
Re: Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
There is no rematch clause Salinas will have to get himself back into mandatory position. Quigg should fight Cermeno on the Froch bill as his voluntarycolumbo wrote:Isnt it obvious? If not im disappointed in you.Horse wrote:Why have you posted that?columbo wrote:I give you http://www.BS.com/salinas-inju ... oms--70401
Re: Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
God I hope not.columbo wrote:I give you http://www.BS.com/salinas-inju ... oms--70401
Re: Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
There is no rematch clause Salinas will have to get himself back into mandatory position. Quigg should fight Cermeno on the Froch bill as his voluntary[/quote]columbo wrote:Isnt it obvious? If not im disappointed in you.Horse wrote:Why have you posted that?columbo wrote:I give you http://www.BS.com/salinas-inju ... oms--70401
What do you mean there was no rematch clause? It was a mandated fight. It's not like it was made with any kind of conditions attached. Look at when Bellew fought Chilemba the first time. Ended up being a rematch with it being a draw.
Re: Scott Quigg v Hozumi Hasegawa
Because Quigg was awarded the title, I believe Salinas counted as his mandatory and usually in that situation the result is final unless there's seriously dodgy officiating.columbo wrote:What do you mean there was no rematch clause? It was a mandated fight. It's not like it was made with any kind of conditions attached. Look at when Bellew fought Chilemba the first time. Ended up being a rematch with it being a draw.columbo wrote:There is no rematch clause Salinas will have to get himself back into mandatory position. Quigg should fight Cermeno on the Froch bill as his voluntaryHorse wrote: Isnt it obvious? If not im disappointed in you.