Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post Reply
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by ThatOne »

Image



Heavyweight champion Evander Holyfield and former champion Mike Tyson were scheduled to fight on Nov. 8, 1991, in Las Vegas in one of the most anticipated fights in years. But Tyson, who was awaiting the start of his rape trial, tore cartilage in his rib in training and the fight was postponed.

Little did anyone know at the time just how long the fight would be delayed. Convicted in the case, Tyson went to prison, while Holyfield went on to participate in other big fights, including his epic trilogy with Riddick Bowe.

After Tyson came out of prison, he spent much of 1995 and 1996 rekindling his "Baddest Man on the Planet" persona as he blew through four opponents who were petrified to face him and given little chance to do anything more than get smashed: Peter McNeeley, Buster Mathis Jr., Frank Bruno (in a rematch to win a world title that Tyson would eventually vacate) and Bruce Seldon (to pick up another belt).

While Tyson looked like a beast in taking them out in fewer than eight combined rounds, Holyfield appeared to be on his last legs. Bowe had knocked him out in their third brutal fight in November 1995, and then Holyfield looked spent in a struggle to defeat Bobby Czyz in May 1996.

For promoter Don King, hoping to keep the Tyson gravy train rolling, the time was right for a Holyfield fight. Everything was perfect.

So little was thought of Holyfield at the time, and there were such concerns over his health, that the Nevada State Athletic Commission asked him to go through a special battery of medical tests at the Mayo Clinic before he could be licensed. But the fight would be a pay-per-view bonanza, and the heavily favored Tyson, who opened as a 25-to-1 favorite, would steamroll the perceived-to-be faded former champion.

But that, of course, is why they fight the fights.

So it was on Nov. 19, 1996, at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas that Tyson and Holyfield finally met, nearly five years to the day after their date with destiny had first been scheduled, and they produced not only a legendary fight but one of the biggest upsets in boxing history.


Although given little chance to win, Holyfield guaranteed victory in the heavily hyped buildup to the fight and then kept his promise in stunning fashion, evoking memories of another big upset: Buster Douglas' knockout of the supposedly invincible Tyson in 1990.

In an action-packed fight, Holyfield mostly dominated. In fact, Holyfield bullied the bully. Although Tyson wobbled him with an uppercut in the fifth round, Holyfield dropped Tyson to his rear end with a left hook in the sixth round, the same round in which an accidental head-butt (Tyson claimed it was intentional) opened a cut over Tyson's left eye.

Although Tyson was landing hard punches, Holyfield took everything and continued to wear Tyson down with his own shots. He had Tyson in huge trouble in the 10th round before finally stopping him on his feet with a massive barrage of blows early in the 11th round.

Naturally, the shocking upset set the stage for the rematch seven months later. You might remember something about an ear bite.

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/95 ... olyfield-i
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by Syntax Error »

There's nothing more satisfying than seeing a bully get his comeuppance & seeing Holyfield bully Tyson will live long in my memory.

Tyson just couldn't handle it & although I give Tyson credit for taking this particular beating like a man, it just proved once & for all that he was nothing more than a bully.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by Ezzard »

Actually nice to read that Holyfield was the washed up fighter going into this. So many people conveniently forget that.
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by bollox »

A precursor to their fight?.........I once read that during the '84 olympic trials? the team had some down time and were playing pool with a 'winner stays on' rule. Tyson lost and Holyfield was next on. Tyson didn't want to hand the stick over so Holyfield insisted. Tyson resisted and Holyfield again insisted. Once Tyson realised Holyfield wasn't intimidated like the others eventually handed over the stick. Just like in their fights :TU:
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by ThatOne »

Ezzard wrote:Actually nice to read that Holyfield was the washed up fighter going into this. So many people conveniently forget that.

That's usually cited as one of the reasons Team Tyson took the fight.

He was a 25-1 dog at the outset and closed to a 6-1 dog the night of the fight.


That being said I watched the Tyson special on FOX and came away with a different opinion of him.
RadioElRadar
Super Middleweight
Posts: 292
Joined: 04 Dec 2012, 04:35

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by RadioElRadar »

bollox wrote:A precursor to their fight?.........I once read that during the '84 olympic trials? the team had some down time and were playing pool with a 'winner stays on' rule. Tyson lost and Holyfield was next on. Tyson didn't want to hand the stick over so Holyfield insisted. Tyson resisted and Holyfield again insisted. Once Tyson realised Holyfield wasn't intimidated like the others eventually handed over the stick. Just like in their fights :TU:
Yeah there's a few stories about Tyson throwing his weight around at those trials.

It's funny how that one story in some ways encapsulates the inevitability of Holyfield's eventual victory years later.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by Syntax Error »

It seems as if Tyson truly was a bully.

It's also very ironic that it was Holyfield that refused to be intimidated by him when they were amateurs & would end up being the man to finally destroy the aura around Tyson, once & for all.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15695
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by elmersalsa »

I remember that fight like it was yesterday. I rooted for Holy, but, I was concerned about his heart and the last two fights he had in which he looked washed up, but I knew that win or lose, he was gonna give the great Mike Tyson a serious fight. A fight that Tyson has never been into. This got to be one of boxing's greatest moments and achievements.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by Ezzard »

I thought this was more clever matchmaking by King. I didn’t think for a moment that Holyfield stood a chance. He was way past it. Had been beaten up and was inconsistent.

It’s a win that has been devalued beyond belief.
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by ThatOne »

Ezzard wrote:I thought this was more clever matchmaking by King. I didn’t think for a moment that Holyfield stood a chance. He was way past it. Had been beaten up and was inconsistent.

It’s a win that has been devalued beyond belief.
Team King took the fight because they thought Holyfield was done. He lost two of his last four fights. They were wrong.

I think the same thing happened in Zaire. Don King is a really lousy human being.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by Ezzard »

Going in what was your opinion?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Ezzard wrote:Actually nice to read that Holyfield was the washed up fighter going into this. So many people conveniently forget that.
:TU:
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by ThatOne »

Ezzard wrote:Going in what was your opinion?

I was biased so I always picked Tyson'e opponents more out of emotion than out of logic. Thst doesn't mean I would put my money on them. I do like the latest Mike though.

That being said after the Douglas fight the air of invincibility around Tyson was gone.

I don't think it was the first or last time a fighter thought he had a mark only to find out he doesn't.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

ThatOne wrote:
Ezzard wrote:Going in what was your opinion?

I was biased so I always picked Tyson'e opponents more out of emotion than out of logic. Thst doesn't mean I would put my money on them. I do like the latest Mike though.

That being said after the Douglas fight the air of invincibility around Tyson was gone.

I don't think it was the first or last time a fighter thought he had a mark only to find out he doesn't.
It reminds me of Leonard/Hearns II in that regard. Heading in Evander & Tommy were supposed to be cannon fodder. Nobody remembers that now.
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by ThatOne »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
ThatOne wrote:
Ezzard wrote:Going in what was your opinion?

I was biased so I always picked Tyson'e opponents more out of emotion than out of logic. Thst doesn't mean I would put my money on them. I do like the latest Mike though.

That being said after the Douglas fight the air of invincibility around Tyson was gone.

I don't think it was the first or last time a fighter thought he had a mark only to find out he doesn't.
It reminds me of Leonard/Hearns II in that regard. Heading in Evander & Tommy were supposed to be cannon fodder. Nobody remembers that now.
It reminds me of The Thrilla In Manilla when Team Ali thought Frazier was done and they were doing him a favor and giving themselves a easy payday. Ali said to Frazier after one of the rounds "they said you were done, Joe" and Joe replied "they lied to you, champ."

They compared the punches thrown versus the punches landed in that fight and the third fight and the difference was huge.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by Ezzard »

Saad is spot on.

Hearns got that rematch because he looked like a busted flush.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Superfight No. 6: Tyson-Holyfield I-by Nigel Collins

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Ezzard wrote:Saad is spot on.

Hearns got that rematch because he looked like a busted flush.
He had to suck down to 162 on top of it all. Rematch after the robbery? No Thank You
Post Reply