There were some heated debates on here during the summer with some knowledgeable posters claiming that this wouldn't happen again.
Kell Brook weighs in....
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Kell Brook weighs in....
....under the welterweight limit.
There were some heated debates on here during the summer with some knowledgeable posters claiming that this wouldn't happen again.

There were some heated debates on here during the summer with some knowledgeable posters claiming that this wouldn't happen again.
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
I thought he looked bad to be honest. Very drawn in the face and dry looking.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
Weighing in under is a bad sign!
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
how much under though? McLlellan-Benn under (2lbs plus), or less than that?
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
What happened to the ripped body we saw in the preparations for the Alexander fight? That's disappeared and he looks a bit gaunt.
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
Good on him; hope he's stayed strong at the weight, you know more about the set up than anyone else on here and it looks from the outside like it takes a lot of effort to get down to the weight. Senchenko is a strong kid and if Kell has weakened himself (like Alvarado did last week) then it really is a hard bout.Pugilist-specialist wrote:....under the welterweight limit.
There were some heated debates on here during the summer with some knowledgeable posters claiming that this wouldn't happen again.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13502
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
He weighed in an ounce or two under......Counter-puncher wrote:how much under though? McLlellan-Benn under (2lbs plus), or less than that?
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
fook me, he's hardly 'nosedived at the weight' then eh?jameswilson wrote:He weighed in an ounce or two under......Counter-puncher wrote:how much under though? McLlellan-Benn under (2lbs plus), or less than that?