Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post Reply
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Vladimir5555 »

Who win this one?
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Syntax Error »

A terrified Spinks is laid out inside 3 rounds I guess.

Then again, I am being grotesquely unfair on Spinks by basing my prediction on the only loss of his career, but he was never a great HW; then again, neither was Shavers, but the difference is, Spinks would never have felt power like it.

Even Tyson didn't punch as hard a Earnie did.
The End
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 931
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 17:53

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by The End »

Interesting matchup . I feel Spinks always gets undersold especially at heavyweight . Shavers could knock anyone out if he landed but it was everything else like boxing skill that could keep him from landing . Be interesting to see if Spinks could keep him off
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by dempseyfire »

I never thought Spinks looked good at HW beyond his effort in the first Holmes fight, vs a Larry who just seemed lethargic/disinterested. Give me Shavers by early KO.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7182
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Nile4000 »

Shavers by KO in 2.Spinks will do enough to survive round 1, but Earnie will size him up perfectly during that initial stanza, and will make the proper adjustments to lay the Spinks man out for the count in the next round.
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Vladimir5555 »

Shavers KO 2
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9183
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Controversial »

Cooney hit as hard as many heavies could and Spinks beat him.
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Vladimir5555 »

Shavers hit harder than Cooney.And he more quick boxer than Cooney.

And i don't like Spinks..)
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46521
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by gilgamesh »

I can't see Spinks being able to make it through 5 rounds without feeling the thunder from Shavers and going to sleep.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by SenorPipino »

Spinks, maybe by late KO.

If it wasn't for his power, Shavers would have been viewed as a very ordinary fighter.
Spinks was a damn good fighter. He couldn't deal with the power AND speed of Tyson, but Shavers hand speed and foot movement wasn't exactly Tysonesque.
Of course danger lurks with every punch that Shavers would throw, but Spinks would survive and wear down a big puncher who had a tendancy to run low on gas as the rounds progressed.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by dempseyfire »

SenorPipino wrote:Spinks, maybe by late KO.

If it wasn't for his power, Shavers would have been viewed as a very ordinary fighter.
Spinks was a damn good fighter. He couldn't deal with the power AND speed of Tyson, but Shavers hand speed and foot movement wasn't exactly Tysonesque.
Of course danger lurks with every punch that Shavers would throw, but Spinks would survive and wear down a big puncher who had a tendancy to run low on gas as the rounds progressed.
Earnie's handspeed gets severely under-rated because most fights we have are him in his mid 30s or olrder when he was already slowing down, and his tendency to throw looping shots. But at his peak the guy had very fast hands. Watch the first fight with Henry Clark; Earnie's jab alone in that fight was rapier-like and hard.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

SenorPipino wrote:Spinks, maybe by late KO.

If it wasn't for his power, Shavers would have been viewed as a very ordinary fighter.
Spinks was a damn good fighter. He couldn't deal with the power AND speed of Tyson, but Shavers hand speed and foot movement wasn't exactly Tysonesque.
Of course danger lurks with every punch that Shavers would throw, but Spinks would survive and wear down a big puncher who had a tendancy to run low on gas as the rounds progressed.
You can make a lot of fighters ordinary if you take away their dominant trait.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15174
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Vladimir5555 wrote:Shavers hit harder than Cooney.And he more quick boxer than Cooney.

And i don't like Spinks..)
You don't like Spinks? He was one of the most likable people in boxing.
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Vladimir5555 »

I mean i don't like his style.
hhaehre
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6427
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 07:26

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by hhaehre »

I'll go against the grain and pick Spinks by late round tko. I think Spinks did quite well at hw and he clearly could take a punch. He could of course loose early against Shavers but I think he'll survive the early rounds and stop an exhausted Shavers late.
Thunder and Lightning
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 177
Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 10:40

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Thunder and Lightning »

I give the nod to Spinks either a descision win or late stoppage, sure Shavers hit harder than most but you need to consider the fact that probably the Biggest reason Spinks was blasted so early by Tyson was that Spinks was scared shitless and while Shavers probably hit harder than Tyson he wasnt as good of a fighter and Didnt have the same aura of invincibility.

Spinks Didnt have a bad chin if guys like Cooney and Holmes couldn't KO him i doubt Shavers would just walk through him, there is a chance but i think Spinks could easely ride the early storm to beat Shavers who didn't have good stamina.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Ezzard »

Cooney...or the Cooney who showed up that night was no yard stick for his 1982 version let alone Shavers...

Holmes landed the right on Mike but couldn't follow up. Shavers wouldn't need to follow up.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15174
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Earnie Shavers v. Michael Spinks

Post by Ambling Alp II »

I don't think there is much question that if Shavers landed anything close to what he was capable of, it would be all over. Except maybe if it's right at the end of a round.
There is a remote chance that Spinks could tag Shavers with something and hurt him, but unlikely. Most likely, Spinks would have to to be extremely careful of not getting nailed while at the same time doing enough to score points. Doable, but very difficult.

Spinks would have a chance, but the most likely result is Shavers by KO, probably in the 5 to 8 round range.
Post Reply