Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post Reply
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by Vladimir5555 »

Who would win?
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by dempseyfire »

I know Saad disagrees, but Norton by decision. Evander doesn't have the power to knock Norton out, and Ken's stamina, left jab, and natural strength would give him the edge in a competitive and action filled contest.
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by ThatOne »

Evander by a decision. While he doesn't hit hard enough to make Kenny back up he does enough to get the decision.
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Re: Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by Vladimir5555 »

Holy MD 12
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15700
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by elmersalsa »

It would be a war, but the heart of Evander was too big. Holyfield by late TKO or split decision against a formidable and skilled champion
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by BoxBuzz »

dempseyfire wrote:I know Saad disagrees, but Norton by decision. Evander doesn't have the power to knock Norton out, and Ken's stamina, left jab, and natural strength would give him the edge in a competitive and action filled contest.

I'd like to follow up on this Dempsey. Do you see Holy losing to both Norton and Frazier? Both in spirited battles? This 3 way is interesting to me for the various styles displayed.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by Counter-puncher »

Holyfield's combination punching trumps the advantage Norton has in natural size IMO

nice fight, though.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Evander absolutely hits hard enough to hurt Norton. I don't think he would stop him, but Evander's two best punches are his hook and his uppercut and they are also the best punches to penetrate Ken's guard. Norton was a steady worker, so when Holyfield took his breaks he'd get out-worked, but his spurts are enough to win a clear decision.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by dempseyfire »

BoxBuzz wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:I know Saad disagrees, but Norton by decision. Evander doesn't have the power to knock Norton out, and Ken's stamina, left jab, and natural strength would give him the edge in a competitive and action filled contest.

I'd like to follow up on this Dempsey. Do you see Holy losing to both Norton and Frazier? Both in spirited battles? This 3 way is interesting to me for the various styles displayed.
Yes. Evander practically always had the conditioning/stamina edge on his 1990s opponents (as well as a firm edge in speed). Wouldn't be the case in those fights, plus those two are natural heavyweights and had the bigger punch.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46522
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Evander Holyfield v. Ken Norton

Post by gilgamesh »

Holyfield would win this one...would be a real entertaining battle though with both men having their moments. I think Holyfield's the more talented fighter with the better chin though, and his ability to hurt Norton more would give him the edge.
Post Reply