Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Post by HomicideHenry »

Duran just had more than LaMotta in everything. The only benefit LaMotta would of had is that he was able to slip punches better than people acknowledge, and that he was often fighting at light heavyweight--- too big and strong and too tough to be hurt by Duran. It would go all 15 rounds, maybe with a 8-3-1 decision for the Hands of Stone.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

HomicideHenry wrote: It would go all 15 rounds, maybe with a 8-3-1 decision for the Hands of Stone.
:lol:
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Post by ThatOne »

Duran was a great fighter but he wouldbe fighting too far out of weight to prevail over a natural middleweight as good as the Bronx Bull.
Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Post by Giancarlo »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote: It would go all 15 rounds, maybe with a 8-3-1 decision for the Hands of Stone.
:lol:

That's epic.

:lol:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Hank is comic gold.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Roberto Duran vs. Jake LaMotta (160 lbs)

Post by HomicideHenry »

Lol, just noticed my mistake, was thinking 12 rounds instead of 15.

In 12 rounder, 8-3-1 Duran

In 15 rounder, 10-4-1 Duran
Post Reply