Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post Reply
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by ThatOne »

There are action-packed fights, and then there is this: The unforgettable spectacle waged by Marvin Hagler and Thomas Hearns, who slugged it out with such mind-blowing reckless abandon that it came to be revered as the quintessential action fight, the one that all others are measured against.

The fight didn't last long -- less than three full rounds (8 minutes, 1 second, to be exact) -- but it was perhaps the most electrifying three rounds in boxing history. It was three rounds of pure violence on boxing's grandest stage between two of the best in the business who, along with Sugar Ray Leonard and Roberto Duran, defined the sport in the 1980s.

Hagler and Hearns both would have preferred a fight with Leonard. Hagler was hungry for the spotlight and the enormous purse it would bring, and Hearns wanted revenge for his only loss, a 14th-round knockout to Leonard in their legendary 1981 undisputed welterweight championship fight. But with Leonard in one of his retirements and out of the picture, Hagler and Hearns turned to each other.


The 30-year-old Hagler, 60-2-2 with 50 knockouts (and having avenged both losses), was the undisputed middleweight champion. The 26-year-old Hearns, who was 40-1 with 34 KOs, had put the loss to Leonard behind him and won the junior middleweight title, but he was moving up in weight to challenge for Hagler's 160-pound crown.

Many forget that Hagler and Hearns had originally been scheduled to fight in May 1982, but Hearns suffered a right hand injury, forcing it to be postponed and later canceled, angering Hagler.

They both continued fighting other opponents, but when the time was right, Hagler-Hearns was eventually made again, this time for April 15, 1985, at the outdoor arena at famed Caesars Palace in Las Vegas. A massive promotion ensued, including a nearly two-week media tour to more than 20 cities across the country.

Day after day, Hagler and Hearns went face-to-face, insulted each other and answered the same questions over and over. They quickly grew tired of each other and got so deeply under each other's skin that they nearly came to blows during the media tour. More than once.

By the time they got to the ring, they seemed to want to kill each other.

When the bell rang after a huge buildup, there was no feeling-out period to speak of. They stormed at each other, and it was on. Punch after punch, neither man let up in an incredible first round hailed by many as the greatest in boxing history.

It was absolutely wild.

Hagler hurt Hearns right off the bat with a right hand, and they spent the rest of the round engaged in a series of fierce toe-to-toe exchanges.

Hearns busted open a cut on Hagler's forehead and, as we would later learn, also broke his right hand -- the power weapon that had disposed of so many previous opponents.


"That was an entire fight accomplished in three minutes," broadcaster Al Michaels exclaimed when the round ended.

The pace did slow in the second round, but it's all relative. There was no way that it could equal the blistering pace the fighters had set in the first three minutes. Still, it was action-packed despite Hearns being a bit rubber-legged.

They spent the final half-minute of the second round in an extended exchange as blood poured from the cut on Hagler's forehead. His corner did an admirable job closing it up between rounds, but it opened again in the third. With Hagler's face covered in blood, referee Richard Steele called timeout to have it examined by the ringside doctor.

Obviously concerned that the fight might be stopped because of the cut, Hagler went after the knockout, pushing even harder than he had in the first two rounds. He cracked Hearns with a right hand that rocked him and kept the pressure on, eventually landing another clean right to the side of Hearns' head to sent him staggering sideways. Hagler followed up with two more right hands that left Hearns limp and falling to the mat like a discarded towel. Somehow, a semi-conscious Hearns got to his feet by the count of nine, but he was gone. Steele wrapped an arm around Hearns and waved the other high overhead, ending one of the most incredible fights in boxing history.

Hagler, his face a bloody mask, celebrated while Hearns was carried back to his corner by one of his handlers. They had fought three rounds that will live forever.

"That was an entire fight accomplished in three minutes," broadcaster Al Michaels exclaimed when the round ended.

The pace did slow in the second round, but it's all relative. There was no way that it could equal the blistering pace the fighters had set in the first three minutes. Still, it was action-packed despite Hearns being a bit rubber-legged.

They spent the final half-minute of the second round in an extended exchange as blood poured from the cut on Hagler's forehead. His corner did an admirable job closing it up between rounds, but it opened again in the third. With Hagler's face covered in blood, referee Richard Steele called timeout to have it examined by the ringside doctor.

Obviously concerned that the fight might be stopped because of the cut, Hagler went after the knockout, pushing even harder than he had in the first two rounds. He cracked Hearns with a right hand that rocked him and kept the pressure on, eventually landing another clean right to the side of Hearns' head to sent him staggering sideways. Hagler followed up with two more right hands that left Hearns limp and falling to the mat like a discarded towel. Somehow, a semi-conscious Hearns got to his feet by the count of nine, but he was gone. Steele wrapped an arm around Hearns and waved the other high overhead, ending one of the most incredible fights in boxing history.

Hagler, his face a bloody mask, celebrated while Hearns was carried back to his corner by one of his handlers. They had fought three rounds that will live forever.

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/96 ... mas-hearns


Image
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15700
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by elmersalsa »

I remember that like yesterday. Two great champions and warriors going at it. Mutual disdain for each other, but respect grew after that.
That was the ONLY WAY to beat the great Thomas Hearns. Constant pressure. You are not gonna beat him by boxing him. In that night, Marvin Hagler was not just great, he was MARVELOUS!!!
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by dr_devious »

The greatest fight I've ever seen, and the one that got me hooked on boxing. Hagler and Hearns are both total legends
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46520
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by gilgamesh »

Definitely a thrilling and great shootout. Probably because I didn't see it live, but I never quite seen this one as "One of the best fights of all time" or whatever. I mean don't misunderstand me it's a great fight, and fun to watch, but I've seen better...more than a few times.
SamWise72
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by SamWise72 »

What are some that you rate as better Gilgamesh? I don't mean that as a challenge, but I'd love to watch them!
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46520
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by gilgamesh »

SamWise72 wrote:What are some that you rate as better Gilgamesh? I don't mean that as a challenge, but I'd love to watch them!
For me personally...these are better.

Morales vs Barrera 1
Gatti vs Ward 1
Bazooka Limon vs Bobby Chacon IV
George Foreman vs Ron Lyle
Castillo vs Corrales 1
Matthew Franklin (Saad Muhammad) vs Richie Kates

...hell even for the two men themselves, I prefer Hearns' two fights with Leonard and Hagler's fight against Mugabi to that particular fight.

I'm not saying it wasn't a great action packed fight. It just doesn't quite measure up to the hype it gets to me for some reason. Neither does David Tua vs Ibeabuchi.

This is all just my opinion of course, if you don't agree with me that's fine.
SamWise72
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by SamWise72 »

All good fights, and thankyou. Wasn't picking an argument, I was genuinely curious
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

The two greatest fights I've watched live were Saad/Lopez 2 & Pryor/Arguello 1. Marquez/Vazquez 3 was right there too. I don't recall the placement on my list, but I think I had this in the 15-20 range.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46520
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by gilgamesh »

SamWise72 wrote:All good fights, and thankyou. Wasn't picking an argument, I was genuinely curious
:TU:
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15174
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by Ambling Alp II »

I think the only thing negative you could really make is that the fights was short. Hard to come up with many other fights that had anywhere close to that much action in the first three rounds. It had more action than most 10 round fights.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by SenorPipino »

I recall Hearns alibing that by running on the sand in Miami during training, his legs were still mysteriously drained weeks later, forcing him into a firefight with Hagler, instead of trying to outbox him.
Slugging or boxing, Hagler would have still walked Tommy down and taken him out.
This battle was won by the tougher guy, and Hagler had that in spades.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15700
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by elmersalsa »

That was THE ONLY WAY for Marvelous to win that fight...With pressure. I just could not see it any other way. And Marv knew it.
Speaking about best fights, I have seen better fights, but this fight was something else. It defined the 80s. The 2 best fights that I have ever seen were Leonard vs Hearns I and Chacon vs Limon IV. Hagler vs Hearns is on my top 10, but, I do not know in what position.

It was a UNFORGETTABLE fight for an UNFORGETTABLE decade.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by Flump »

gilgamesh wrote:
SamWise72 wrote:What are some that you rate as better Gilgamesh? I don't mean that as a challenge, but I'd love to watch them!
For me personally...these are better.

Morales vs Barrera 1
Gatti vs Ward 1
Bazooka Limon vs Bobby Chacon IV
George Foreman vs Ron Lyle
Castillo vs Corrales 1
Matthew Franklin (Saad Muhammad) vs Richie Kates

...hell even for the two men themselves, I prefer Hearns' two fights with Leonard and Hagler's fight against Mugabi to that particular fight.

I'm not saying it wasn't a great action packed fight. It just doesn't quite measure up to the hype it gets to me for some reason. Neither does David Tua vs Ibeabuchi.

This is all just my opinion of course, if you don't agree with me that's fine.
I think the thing that you don't get when you're watching it back knowing the result is that Hagler was bleeding so much that he was on borrowed time, which made it all the more dramatic.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by SenorPipino »

Does anyone really think that such a huge fight would have been stopped by the cut?

It was on Hagler's forehead, not his eye. Even prelim bouts are seldom halted because of a forehead gash.
I think claiming that Hagler was on the verge of being TKO'd, is overused in retrospectives simply to bolster the fight's legendary status.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15700
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by elmersalsa »

He got shook but not hurt. But I know he felt the Hitman's bombs. If anybody think that those punches did not do something to the Marvelous One, then that person is lying
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Those blows definitely did something to Hagler, they pissed him off.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by Flump »

SenorPipino wrote:Does anyone really think that such a huge fight would have been stopped by the cut?

It was on Hagler's forehead, not his eye. Even prelim bouts are seldom halted because of a forehead gash.
I think claiming that Hagler was on the verge of being TKO'd, is overused in retrospectives simply to bolster the fight's legendary status.
The fact that Steele had the doctor look at him was enough, you can never second guess what a doctor would say. Did you see the fight live Pipino?
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by dempseyfire »

The first round is definitely one of the, if the not the greatest, rounds of all time in boxing. Put that round on and any human being comes away amazed whether they even like sports or not let alone boxing.

I think the greatness of the first round over-shadows the fact that the next two rounds were much more average. Overall a great fight, but I think there are better fights that have more sustained drama. Once Hearns broke his hand the boxing match began and the slugfest ended.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by Ezzard »

Once Hearns broke his hand it was over as a competitive fight.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by Syntax Error »

Hagler was magnificent in this fight.

He beat Hearns the only way you could realistically beat him.

What's even more amazing is that Hagler was past his best, as he was much slower in the bout than he had been previously.

The only thing what marred this fight was Manny Steward's pathetic excuse for Hearns' loss; "somebody massaged Tommy's legs before the fight!" :lol:

Why couldn't he just admit that Tommy was sucked into a war by Hagler because he thought he could KO anyone with that murderous Right hand of his?
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by bollox »

I tend to think that Tommy summed it up best when asked why he slugged rather than box....."because he wouldn't let me"

That's one of the many things I always liked about Tommy, his honesty
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by Syntax Error »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Those blows definitely did something to Hagler, they pissed him off.
Absolutely.

I believe that Hagler was quite offended that Hearns had the audacity to try & KO him with one punch, rather than box him!! :P
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15700
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Superfight No. 1: Hagler-Hearns

Post by elmersalsa »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Those blows definitely did something to Hagler, they pissed him off.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Yes, I agree. It pissed him off, but also shooked him a little bit. Hearns could hit.
Post Reply