Frampton v Galahad

Fergz16COTJ
Middleweight
Posts: 75
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 06:47

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by Fergz16COTJ »

Horse wrote:Frampton better fight someone good in his next fight or this will look like a duck.
Well hopefully its the winner of Martinez and Mathebula
Fergz16COTJ
Middleweight
Posts: 75
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 06:47

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by Fergz16COTJ »

los2 wrote:
pyenest77 wrote:Galahad is a hype job. Frampton would walk through him!
no he isnt....no he wouldnt cos he would rather lose his belt then fight him...
:lol: - Frampton has bigger fish to fry than Young Barry...maybe he should fight someone the level that Carl has 1st
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by Horse »

Fergz16COTJ wrote:Well hopefully its the winner of Martinez and Mathebula
He should fight someone else before then.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by lefty »

DMA1987 wrote:
Fergz16COTJ wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:Didn't think Frampton would go in with Galahad.

Frampton would have been favourite but probably didn't see this as easy as some on here seem to think it would be.
And why would he go in with Galahad though, Carl is ranked #2 with WBC, ranked #2 with IBF...He has defended his European and Commonwealth titles and has outgrown this sphere, he is close to a world title fight, why would he fight Galahad to defend those titles when he is looking upwards..

Galahad hasnt fought anyone of the level Carl has, this is a good opportunity for him to take those belts Carl has vacated and fight an opponent of a higher level than he has been...Jeremy Parodi for instance.

Carl has no worries that he wouldnt dispose of Galahad, none whatsoever
Would have a been a good payday for a fight which gives him no worries - especially while he waits for the Martinez v Mathebula winner.
Would it?! I wasnt aware that Galahad was some big draw.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by davie »

Carl has no worries that he wouldnt dispose of Galahad, none whatsoever[/quote]

Would have a been a good payday for a fight which gives him no worries - especially while he waits for the Martinez v Mathebula winner.[/quote]
Would it?! I wasnt aware that Galahad was some big draw.[/quote]

it's a fight that would sell well in the uk. one guy thats on the outskirts of world level and another predicted to get there in the not too distant future.
there was a lot of interest in a frampton vs quigg fight, this may make a decent substitute for the fans
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by los2 »

Fergz16COTJ wrote:
los2 wrote:
pyenest77 wrote:Galahad is a hype job. Frampton would walk through him!
no he isnt....no he wouldnt cos he would rather lose his belt then fight him...
:lol: - Frampton has bigger fish to fry than Young Barry...maybe he should fight someone the level that Carl has 1st
galahad is his mandatory.... :shame: :shame:
davy131
Middleweight
Posts: 5
Joined: 03 Feb 2013, 15:46

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by davy131 »

I don't think Galahad is at framptons level and I just think Frampton would bully him round the ring then stop him in the later rounds I don't think it would be a good fight I however think quigg vs Galahad would be a better match up and far more exciting fight to watch
tallsdav
Super Middleweight
Posts: 85
Joined: 26 Jan 2013, 16:40

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by tallsdav »

Galahad would play with both quigg and frampton. No way could either of those stop him or outwork him.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23196
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by mickey1975 »

tallsdav wrote:Galahad would play with both quigg and frampton. No way could either of those stop him or outwork him.
Do do you rate Jazza higher than Carl and Scott because KG certainly didn't play with him?
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by davie »

tallsdav wrote:Galahad would play with both quigg and frampton. No way could either of those stop him or outwork him.
i think the only man capable of "playing" with quigg or frampton is rigodeaux.
your a long way off there mate
if you think galahad would beat either, you're welcome to your opinion, but i disagree.
but "play" with them? come on now
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by DMA1987 »

tallsdav wrote:Galahad would play with both quigg and frampton. No way could either of those stop him or outwork him.
You make it hard for us Galahad fans with bollocks like that mate. He clearly wouldn't play with either. I do believe he would have a good chance of winning though.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by digzee »

Just because KG looks good in sparring that doesn't mean much unless he shows it on fight night. I've seen his fights on C5 but I've not seen him play with anyone at British level. I have though seen Frampton beat Kiko and look good in the process, amongst other solid wins as well. I think there is a bigger gap here than there is between Froch and Groves. Galahad is only 23 he's got time to improve and gain experience, give it 2 years and who knows.
tallsdav
Super Middleweight
Posts: 85
Joined: 26 Jan 2013, 16:40

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by tallsdav »

DMA1987 wrote:
tallsdav wrote:Galahad would play with both quigg and frampton. No way could either of those stop him or outwork him.
You make it hard for us Galahad fans with bollocks like that mate. He clearly wouldn't play with either. I do believe he would have a good chance of winning though.
I've seen more than enough to know I'm not talking bollocks, mate. I'm not sure what I've missed from quigg and frampton this past 12 months, though. Neither has looked great and I don't think either would be able to handle the pace against Galahad. Sorry for making it hard for you though mate.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by digzee »

tallsdav wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
tallsdav wrote:Galahad would play with both quigg and frampton. No way could either of those stop him or outwork him.
You make it hard for us Galahad fans with bollocks like that mate. He clearly wouldn't play with either. I do believe he would have a good chance of winning though.
I've seen more than enough to know I'm not talking bollocks, mate. I'm not sure what I've missed from quigg and frampton this past 12 months, though. Neither has looked great and I don't think either would be able to handle the pace against Galahad. Sorry for making it hard for you though mate.
What fights have you seen as proof of this? Gym stuff doesn't mean sh1t unless you can do it on fight night, he's not even fought above British level yet.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

mullenman wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
pyenest77 wrote:Galahad is a hype job. Frampton would walk through him!
People on this thread who have seen him in the gym don't think he's a hype job. Kell Brook is waiting on a world title shot 5 divisions above and he can't walk through him.
no way is that true
its just people in the same gym "bigging" each other up
kell would ko this kid in one round

thats just silly talk
They spar together a lot, Kell never walks through him.

:TU:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23196
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by mickey1975 »

I'm sure they do, but it is completely different. I know lads in our gym who are at completely different levels who have competitive spars.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

digzee wrote:
What fights have you seen as proof of this? Gym stuff doesn't mean sh1t unless you can do it on fight night, he's not even fought above British level yet.
Frampton has had 2 fights above British level = one of those was a voluntary against someone ranked lower than Galahad. Instead of facing his mandatory defence he's giving the belt up.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23196
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by mickey1975 »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
digzee wrote:
What fights have you seen as proof of this? Gym stuff doesn't mean sh1t unless you can do it on fight night, he's not even fought above British level yet.
Frampton has had 2 fights above British level = one of those was a voluntary against someone ranked lower than Galahad. Instead of facing his mandatory defence he's giving the belt up.
Look, we know you are close to the gym but you can't even compare knocking out Kiko to struggling with Jazza.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

mickey1975 wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
digzee wrote:
What fights have you seen as proof of this? Gym stuff doesn't mean sh1t unless you can do it on fight night, he's not even fought above British level yet.
Frampton has had 2 fights above British level = one of those was a voluntary against someone ranked lower than Galahad. Instead of facing his mandatory defence he's giving the belt up.
Look, we know you are close to the gym but you can't even compare knocking out Kiko to struggling with Jazza.
I'm not mickey. The poster said that Galahad hasn't boxed above British level and I pointed out that Frampton only had twice and one of those was ranked below Galahad.

:TU:
youngrell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2381
Joined: 30 Jun 2008, 15:56

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by youngrell »

I have to admire the Sheffield boxing fans' support of their local fighters, but sometimes the blind faith shown is just crazy.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by rossij8 »

I'm sure KG will be world class in a couple of years, he looks impressive - Frampton is currently world class and would win now, if they fought
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by rhino222 »

Barry Awad would fight anyone in his weight division, unfortunately the opponent decisions are made by manager and promoter. I think Hennessy keeps away from Frampton etc at moment, the Euro is now vacant so I expect galahad to fight for the vacant title against Parodi or Djelkhir. When euro champion I expect Galahad to go down the Mijares or Wake route to the title.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by digzee »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
digzee wrote:
What fights have you seen as proof of this? Gym stuff doesn't mean sh1t unless you can do it on fight night, he's not even fought above British level yet.
Frampton has had 2 fights above British level = one of those was a voluntary against someone ranked lower than Galahad. Instead of facing his mandatory defence he's giving the belt up.
Molitor at the time, while on the slide, was a former world champion and a solid win. Parodi is a good tough Euro level fighter, if he fought Galahad tomorrow I think it would be a 50/50 fight, in my eyes anyway. Then there is obviously Kiko... While Galahad's best win was JD and lets be honest if he's as special as you say he is he would of out boxed him no problem, no offence to JD. I really am not a Galahad hater I just want him to show his talents on fight night against good opposition first
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by Parson Cross »

Am I missing something here ?
Barry is an easy fight allegedly so would be the perfect tune up for a World title tilt.
Instead Frampton vacates and will probably fight some unknown Eastern European in a 10 rounder.
That says to me that Barry is a significant risk to team Frampton.
As Horse says - lets see who he fights next - then we can decide whether duck is on the menu.
Can you imagine the debate on here if it was someone from Sheffield that vacated in similar circumstances ?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Post by palooka »

I imagine that neither boxer is 'afraid' of the other and Frampton has more to lose and lite to gain in a bout v Galahad. Smart and experienced minds are around Frampton, Quigg and Galahad. Frampton will box someone he can look ferocious against to get a foothold in the American Irish market. For me, all are very good and I'd have Quigg as the best of the 3 with Frampton and then Galahad; I can't blame him for wanting to jump straight in there; he's nothing to lose and everything to gain - does boxing work like that though?

If someone from Sheffield did vacate in similar circumstances then some would point the finger, some would try to understand the reason and those who knew the boxer or the gym would defend the boxer to the end of the earth.
Post Reply