Jane Couch vs Ifilm London

mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Jane Couch vs Ifilm London

Post by mullenman »

Groove Armada wrote:
Eddy wrote:I think Ifilm do a great job of covering the sport of boxing (unlike newspapers). Keep up the good work lads. :TU:
Agree!

:TU:
i also agree

if you dont like them. dont watch them
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Jane Couch vs Ifilm London

Post by WelshJack »

They do a video a day normally and whether you like Kugan or not personally I can watch more of his interviews than Helder's
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Jane Couch vs Ifilm London

Post by TJ77 »

More amusing than Gareth Davies stumbling into their interviews going on about his shoes anyway. I think the last time he did it he said Kugan wasn't a real journalist (he might not be, but it was a bit of an arsehole thing to say I thought) got a pair of blank looks from Eddie and Kugan and then just left before Kugan said 'anyway where were we....' and carried on with the interview like nothing had happened.[/quote]

Yeah saw that was at the presser for carpe diem I think.[/quote]

Did you think the same as me that he came across as a bit of a prat?[/quote]
Yes mate he was childish and looked to be voicing an opinion held by Hearn maybe.
Think Davies can come across a bit of a tool on occasion.
Could just be anyone sat opposit Bunce on allegedly comes over like that.
jackukmma
Super Middleweight
Posts: 329
Joined: 10 Feb 2013, 01:32

Re: Jane Couch vs Ifilm London

Post by jackukmma »

I don't understand the people who say the Hearn stuff is boring. I can understand it can be for some people and not everyone has the time to watch it all. There's a very simple answer if you don't like it, don't watch it! How hard can it be, if you don't like it just don't watch it, nobody is forcing you to watch everything they put out. I like the Hearn stuff, don't always have time to watch them but at least I have the option to watch or not.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Jane Couch vs Ifilm London

Post by whiskey »

How the eff can people slag off iFLT ?

I remember when Clev vs Kovalev was on and you could see there was a gigantic online hole left by their absence from that important British event.
Londonirish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3064
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02

Re: Jane Couch vs Ifilm London

Post by Londonirish »

mullenman wrote:
Groove Armada wrote:
Eddy wrote:I think Ifilm do a great job of covering the sport of boxing (unlike newspapers). Keep up the good work lads. :TU:
Agree!

:TU:
i also agree

if you dont like them. dont watch them


Spot on :TU:
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Jane Couch vs Ifilm London

Post by hurlock »

I thought jane was great because the fighters are different towards women & she has great lad like banter & was pretty comical.
Suprised knowbodys jumping on the fake haye injurys she has claimed & she is pretty honest & speaks her mind.
I wouldn't say has feigned things, but I don't trust him & feel really let down & lost intrest in him
Kyle1991
Middleweight
Posts: 11
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 00:10

Re: Jane Couch vs Ifilm London

Post by Kyle1991 »

There was a spell when Ifilm fell out with allegedly and there were no videos for a while, everyone was on about it wanting them to sort things out because we were all missing the videos so they must be doing something right. People forget they don't get payed to do what they do, they obviously get money from somewhere but it's not there duty to be travelling up and down the country getting us hardcore fans the latest action. We would all miss them if they weren't there!!
Post Reply