Winky Vs Toney at 160 what if?

[Max Molyneux]

Well since Toney at middleweight is in the past who wins it?

[Autobarn]

Whether he'd deserve to or not, if it happens in the early '90s Toney wins. I'm a Toney fan, but IMO McCallum (twice), Reggie Johnson, and Dave Tiberi were all robbed against him.

But Winky's only had one fight at m/w, so it's hard to say how WW acquits himself

[Max Molyneux]

WW has had one fight but he was always big for light middle so he is a genuine middle.

[-KOKid-]

It's easy to think Toney in this one because of the fact that he moved up and beat much bigger men. But he have to remember that Toney was always as impressive as these days at 160. Some figthers who were supposed to be easy fights for him turned out to be absolute nightmares, like Tiberi.
I'd go with Toney, but it could well be a pick'em.

-KOKid-

[theone]

. I'm a Toney fan, but IMO McCallum (twice), Reggie Johnson, and Dave Tiberi were all robbed against him

.

I thought Toney beat McCallum all 3 times they fought and was robbbed of a win when the first one was caled a draw. I though Johnson lost a close fight, but I agree with you about Tiberi.
Oh yeah...Tony UD12 over Wright.

[Autobarn]

. I'm a Toney fan, but IMO McCallum (twice), Reggie Johnson, and Dave Tiberi were all robbed against him

.

I thought Toney beat McCallum all 3 times they fought and was robbbed of a win when the first one was caled a draw. I though Johnson lost a close fight, but I agree with you about Tiberi.
Oh yeah...Tony UD12 over Wright.

I feel Toney got too much credit for the good finish in fight 1, was frustrated and subtly outboxed in fight two, but won part 3 when MM was shot.

[wolverine1]

I'd go with Winky on this one. Winky has too much movement for Toney to deal with. Plus, Winky's not as stupid as the other fighters to keep jabbing at Toney's head - he'd work on anything that was open and win by decision.