Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
He's Lee's trainer and manager isn't he?
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Cheers palooka!palooka wrote:Yusi Malinga was the mandatory for Jamie's title
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
It's a run out for the Matchroom boxers so there'll be no surprises; it doesn't have to be a slaughter though.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
The fights at this stage of any card are gonna be shite. And I do mean any card. It's only the top 3 or so fights on any bill that are gonna be worth a damn. Obviously that isn't the case with tonights bill but moaning about the fights that are going on right now is pretty daft.squared circle wrote:I was live at froch Kessler so no idea what they did. Almost certain wlad v haye didn't have adverts?jameswilson wrote:You act like they haven't shown adverts on PPV before......squared circle wrote:14.99 and they show adverts. Pretty outrageous. We should be getting analysis etc in between every round for money we have paid.
I'm more pissed off with quality of fights at minute tbh!!
And there were ads in the Haye v Wladimir PPV bill.[/quote]
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
No worries Neil; I've not seen Malinga box and think he's to box Hall now.Neil Gee wrote:Cheers palooka!palooka wrote:Yusi Malinga was the mandatory for Jamie's title
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
The guy Smith is in with was knocked out by a 13-7 guy in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13518
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I'm pretty sure they could of gotten better opponents than this. Im not talking world title fights or even the best guys in the division but this truely crap.jameswilson wrote:I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I'd rather have less rubbish and not have to pay for itjameswilson wrote:I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Same.rossij8 wrote:I'd rather have less rubbish and not have to pay for itjameswilson wrote:I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Hearn did say though that the undercard had to be outrageous for this to be PPV, I think it is but for the opposite reason..jameswilson wrote:I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Juanma Lopez wiped this guy out in when he was at superbantam
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
The scheduled undercard was never good.
Hearn didn't even try.
Hearn didn't even try.
Last edited by Horse on 23 Nov 2013, 15:43, edited 1 time in total.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13518
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Have you paid for this?rossij8 wrote:I'd rather have less rubbish and not have to pay for itjameswilson wrote:I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Yeah, Smith is showing what an elite operator he is tonight.Naandrew wrote:Juanma Lopez wiped this guy out in when he was at superbantam
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I'd rather have less rubbish and not have to pay for it[/quote]
Have you paid for this?[/quote]
I have but I daren't even turn it on yet; if it's shit it'll be world war 3 in ours - '£15 for this' etc etc etc for ever.
Have you paid for this?[/quote]
I have but I daren't even turn it on yet; if it's shit it'll be world war 3 in ours - '£15 for this' etc etc etc for ever.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
STEPHEN SMAAAAAAAAAAA!!
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17225
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I can hear Groves' arse going from here.
Night night Georgie boy.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13518
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
That belt looks like something I made at primary school.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Who wants a game?


Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I looked at both Hall & Malinga's boxrec and neither of them have a record as good as J's.palooka wrote:I've not seen Malinga box and think he's to box Hall now.Neil Gee wrote:palooka wrote:Yusi Malinga was the mandatory for Jamie's title
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
You missed "teak tough"
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Hahahaha that is classexpe wrote:Who wants a game?
Printing it off