Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

For RBR threads only
Post Reply
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

The Sky guys just say Takashi "Miury" is the WBC champion? Miury? GAH!

And for the record, Miura destroys Smith!
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

digzee wrote:You missed "teak tough"
I didn't make it but at least 5 of those have already been out tonight and the rest will follow.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by lefty »

They're so tough.... Really Johnny?! Must "tough" guys dont get stopped in 4 of their 7 losses and in a domestic level fight against a 13-7 guy.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by lefty »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:The Sky guys just say Takashi "Miury" is the WBC champion? Miury? GAH!

And for the record, Miura destroys Smith!
They've gone for the easiest route in the division in terms of sanctioning bodies. Mikey Garcia would obliterate Smith and so would Uchiyama.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:The Sky guys just say Takashi "Miury" is the WBC champion? Miury? GAH!

And for the record, Miura destroys Smith!
Surprised their going the WBC route to be honest, Mendez with the IBF would be a better option.

'The nation is still very much in love with Luke Campbell' Who loves him? I wouldn't care if he got knocked out tonight. Talk like that is why I hate Sky, too much hype, the quicker the Olympians get pasted so we don't have to hear about them the better.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by digzee »

expe wrote:
digzee wrote:You missed "teak tough"
I didn't make it but at least 5 of those have already been out tonight and the rest will follow.
Ah ok sorry
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13518
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by jameswilson »

columbo wrote:Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
Really? You've only mentioned this 600 times now.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by palooka »

keithmoonhangover wrote:I can hear Groves' arse going from here. :wave: Night night Georgie boy.
You're imagining that; he's got more balls than any of us on here and I don't think he'll freeze, I hope he breaks Frochs conk.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by lefty »

jameswilson wrote:
columbo wrote:Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
Really? You've only mentioned this 600 times now.
I forgot that Eddie Hearn is immune from criticism from you. If this was a FW card, you'd be slagging it off and you know it.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13518
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by jameswilson »

columbo wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
columbo wrote:Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
Really? You've only mentioned this 600 times now.
I forgot that Eddie Hearn is immune from criticism from you. If this was a FW card, you'd be slagging it off and you know it.

I wouldn't be slagging off the 11th fight down the card. On a allegedly card a fight of the standard of the McDonnell fight would be the chief support. And it's no good giving it the 'ohhhhhh I don't have to pay for that tho!!!' Well you do have to pay don't you.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17228
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

palooka wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:I can hear Groves' arse going from here. :wave: Night night Georgie boy.
You're imagining that; he's got more balls than any of us on here and I don't think he'll freeze, I hope he breaks Frochs conk.
I was joking mate. But he's gonna take a beating tonight mate.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

columbo wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:The Sky guys just say Takashi "Miury" is the WBC champion? Miury? GAH!

And for the record, Miura destroys Smith!
They've gone for the easiest route in the division in terms of sanctioning bodies. Mikey Garcia would obliterate Smith and so would Uchiyama.
Wait for Uchiyama v Miura II (sometime next year), then fight for the vacant WBA "regular" or go for Mendez (IBF). Miura is a beast, not on Garcia or Garcia level but tough and a monster puncher himself, "avoid".
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by lefty »

columbo wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
columbo wrote:Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.
Really? You've only mentioned this 600 times now.
I forgot that Eddie Hearn is immune from criticism from you. If this was a FW card, you'd be slagging it off and you know it.

I wouldn't be slagging off the 11th fight down the card. On a allegedly card a fight of the standard of the McDonnell fight would be the chief support. And it's no good giving it the 'ohhhhhh I don't have to pay for that tho!!!' Well you do have to pay don't you.[/quote]

So what's the Co-main event then James?
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by rossij8 »

Chuck Jones.

That is all.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13518
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by jameswilson »

columbo wrote:
So what's the Co-main event then James?
The chief support of this bill is the same standard as some of Nathan Cleverly's defences (apart from the Kovalev one obviously.)
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by lefty »

jameswilson wrote:
columbo wrote:
So what's the Co-main event then James?
The chief support of this bill is the same standard as some of Nathan Cleverly's defences (apart from the Kovalev one obviously.)
I'm sure you slagged them off aswell. It's a double standard.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by lefty »

Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4602
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by JC »

rossij8 wrote:
expe wrote:Who wants a game?

Image
Hahahaha that is class

Printing it off
Love it

'High on the Heed'
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Horse »

Chuck Jones: 46th best lightweight in Britain.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

columbo wrote:Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
Poached? By who? :-?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by lefty »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:
columbo wrote:Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
Poached? By who? :-?
Who do you think? Last time I checked, he was a Hennessy fighter.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13518
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by jameswilson »

columbo wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
columbo wrote:
So what's the Co-main event then James?
The chief support of this bill is the same standard as some of Nathan Cleverly's defences (apart from the Kovalev one obviously.)
I'm sure you slagged them off aswell. It's a double standard.
I slagged them off because they topped the bill. And I have slagged this particular Quigg fight off too earlier this week in a discussion we both had. It isn't good enough for a chief support, but the point is it is a chief support, not a main event.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

columbo wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:
columbo wrote:Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
Poached? By who? :-?
Who do you think? Last time I checked, he was a Hennessy fighter.
Pretty sure Yafai is Matchroom...
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13518
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by jameswilson »

columbo wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:
columbo wrote:Kal Yafai sat behind Eddie. Another guy about to be poached I imagine.
Poached? By who? :-?
Who do you think? Last time I checked, he was a Hennessy fighter.
....Don't think so mate. Yafai has been Matchroom for a while.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by crusader »

Thinking of Galahad maybe?
Post Reply