Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.Horse wrote:So PPVs never lose money?keithmoonhangover wrote:If you can't work that out for yourself, you ain't worth talking to.
Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
He needs some false tan on them legs.jameswilson wrote:Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.
-
ajwesty13
- Heavyweight

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Santa Cruz is his best chance as Rigo a bridge to far thoughSouthpawStephen wrote:How does Quigg do against guys like Rigo and Santa Cruz?
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I reckon the buy rate was low.keithmoonhangover wrote:Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The hype for the PPV was lackluster to say the least.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
'Talking 'bout my generation." 
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.keithmoonhangover wrote:I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.keithmoonhangover wrote:I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Horse wrote:I reckon the buy rate was low.keithmoonhangover wrote:Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The hype for the PPV was lackluster to say the least.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Horse wrote:I reckon the buy rate was low.keithmoonhangover wrote:Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The hype for the PPV was lackluster to say the least.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13520
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
You surprised? He hardly looks like Holly Hagan in the face does he?keithmoonhangover wrote:He needs some false tan on them legs.jameswilson wrote:Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13374
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
How long to go till the main event boys ? I'm out and about & the Internet coverage sucks
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I think we've just seen someone interviewed whose closely connected with Bolivia.....
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
jameswilson wrote:You surprised? He hardly looks like Holly Hagan in the face does he?keithmoonhangover wrote:He needs some false tan on them legs.jameswilson wrote:Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
A bit like your Monthly pound for pound British threadHorse wrote:Desperate stuff.taffytoon wrote:yes you do
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13520
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Which PPV cards are you talking about? Don't think I knew about these cards that had 8 World title unifications on them between 2 of the top 3 fighters in the division.Ketchel wrote:Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.keithmoonhangover wrote:I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.
Or are you just exaggerating...
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Froch-Kessler wasn't a unification fight.jameswilson wrote:Which PPV cards are you talking about? Don't think I knew about these cards that had 8 World title unifications on them between 2 of the top 3 fighters in the division.Ketchel wrote:Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.keithmoonhangover wrote:
I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.
Or are you just exaggerating...
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Haye talking sense. Groves shouldn't have wound him up. I've said it before, Groves is open to the uppercut - he stands with his head to far forward.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Naz is a legend. Met him twice. Top man.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Froch makes the same mistake when throwing punches though and Groves is faster and I'd say he has the bigger one punch power.keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye talking sense. Groves shouldn't have wound him up. I've said it before, Groves is open to the uppercut - he stands with his head to far forward.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Naz.......even his hands are fat!!!!!!
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Can tell he hasn't changed from the way he's talking, was never an act with him.keithmoonhangover wrote:Naz is a legend. Met him twice. Top man.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
How big is Hamed going to get?
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
He got fatSouthpawStephen wrote:I always like seeing an undefeated fighter to lose because I feel it brings out some truth. What happened when Naz lost?
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I'm looking forward to this fight, they keep saying that it's Groves talk that has built the fight up but I fancied it because I watched Groves beat Alcoba and thought he was a star in the making.keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye talking sense. Groves shouldn't have wound him up. I've said it before, Groves is open to the uppercut - he stands with his head to far forward.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
At heavyweightSouthpawStephen wrote:expe wrote:He got fatSouthpawStephen wrote:I always like seeing an undefeated fighter to lose because I feel it brings out some truth. What happened when Naz lost?And quit after his first loss. The way he's talking, he should still be fighting.