Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Retire Carl.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
What the hell was that!
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Froch u w***er
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Oh and cheating judges as well. Nice.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Two judges had it 76-75. Joke.
Last edited by sendo on 23 Nov 2013, 19:25, edited 1 time in total.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Groves turned his back. Froch would have stopped him.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
HAS FROCH WON????
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Howard Foster shouldn't be allowed to referee again for a long time the man is a pudendum of the highest order Froch should have had points off and the stoppage was bullshit. Hearn has paid off the ref and judges 76-75 is a terrible score. Bunch of fornicating wankers absolute bastards
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
That was wrong! It feels wrong!
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
terrible stoppage,groves was hurt but he wasn't gone
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Bollocks he was slipping shots and firing back. He was hurt and tired, but so was Froch.keithmoonhangover wrote:Groves turned his back. Froch would have stopped him.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
fornicate this corrupt business after 30 years I am not interested in boxing anymore all the best to you all
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
We've been robbed.
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
He took one lucky shot
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17236
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Groves is still wobbling in the corner.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
100% agreeexpe wrote:Howard Foster shouldn't be allowed to referee again for a long time the man is a pudendum of the highest order Froch should have had points off and the stoppage was bullshit. Hearn has paid off the ref and judges 76-75 is a terrible score. Bunch of effing wankers absolute bastards
-
WayoftheCass
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 719
- Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 02:22
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Oh dear.........Groves all over the place but looks a bit iffy. Defo should be a rematch.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Well done Carl! What balls this man has! He was getting on top but Howard WTF? looked like he wanted to fight the amount of times he was jumping in!
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
I ain't even watching and I feel gutted about the finish purely based on your reactions!
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
absolutely disgusting stoppage.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
Give over, everyone has got eyeskeithmoonhangover wrote:Groves is still wobbling in the corner.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
corrupt as fornicate
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
No kidding. This is boxing and people get hurt once in a while.sendo wrote:Bollocks he was slipping shots and firing back. He was hurt and tired, but so was Froch.keithmoonhangover wrote:Groves turned his back. Froch would have stopped him.
Groves looked weary but he was fighting back and both men were very tired.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
McCloskey said cheated not defeated after the Khan fight, he wasn't, this is a case of that.
Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*
x2SNG wrote:Give over, everyone has got eyeskeithmoonhangover wrote:Groves is still wobbling in the corner.