Ratings - please read before commenting - Archived
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Can anyone tell me what Groves' and Froch's points totals would have been had the fight gone to Groves by UD rather than Froch by stoppage?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Depends on the scores.@matt___s wrote:Can anyone tell me what Groves' and Froch's points totals would have been had the fight gone to Groves by UD rather than Froch by stoppage?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Assuming Groves by 2 on all cards, say?JCS wrote:Depends on the scores.@matt___s wrote:Can anyone tell me what Groves' and Froch's points totals would have been had the fight gone to Groves by UD rather than Froch by stoppage?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
groves old = 394
froch old = 975
I believe Froch would be at 751.. I no longer have access to the code and the ratings description isn't clear as to where Groves would be placed because his point earn alone wouldn't put him over Froch... he would need further assistance.. I'd expect Groves to be around 800.
froch old = 975
I believe Froch would be at 751.. I no longer have access to the code and the ratings description isn't clear as to where Groves would be placed because his point earn alone wouldn't put him over Froch... he would need further assistance.. I'd expect Groves to be around 800.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Groves would be at around 700 points, just a bit higher than Froch.
Normal points win would see Grove behind Froch. So he would be set just a bit above the mean of the old ratings before the bout - and Froch a bit lower.
Normal points win would see Grove behind Froch. So he would be set just a bit above the mean of the old ratings before the bout - and Froch a bit lower.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
computerrank wrote:Groves would be at around 700 points, just a bit higher than Froch.
Normal points win would see Grove behind Froch. So he would be set just a bit above the mean of the old ratings before the bout - and Froch a bit lower.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
why did froch go up to 1042 after tko victory vs groves, from 975
now 2 days later, he is back to 975 points. why has he lost points for????
now 2 days later, he is back to 975 points. why has he lost points for????
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
I see him at 994. Still odd.cold187 wrote:why did froch go up to 1042 after tko victory vs groves, from 975
now 2 days later, he is back to 975 points. why has he lost points for????
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Froch had a rating of 1042 points after his win on 2013-11-23.
But his best opponent Lucian Bute with 879 points before their bout on 2012-05-26 got out of scope after 18 months on 2013-11-26.
Now his best opponent is Mikkel Kessler with only 473 points before their bout.
This was somewhat less than the required 50% of his own rating. So Froch lost some points.
But his best opponent Lucian Bute with 879 points before their bout on 2012-05-26 got out of scope after 18 months on 2013-11-26.
Now his best opponent is Mikkel Kessler with only 473 points before their bout.
This was somewhat less than the required 50% of his own rating. So Froch lost some points.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
but its not frochs fault that bute has notbeen fighting (or maybe it is). this way froch is penalised points due to another pesons inactivity.computerrank wrote:Froch had a rating of 1042 points after his win on 2013-11-23.
But his best opponent Lucian Bute with 879 points before their bout on 2012-05-26 got out of scope after 18 months on 2013-11-26.
Now his best opponent is Mikkel Kessler with only 473 points before their bout.
This was somewhat less than the required 50% of his own rating. So Froch lost some points.
also i saw solis vs leif larsen previosuly.
why when solis won by UD he lost points and larsen won points.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
The opponents are measured by their rating before the bout. And the boxer taking the opponent is responsible for choosing him.cold187 wrote:but its not frochs fault that bute has notbeen fighting (or maybe it is). this way froch is penalised points due to another pesons inactivity.computerrank wrote:Froch had a rating of 1042 points after his win on 2013-11-23.
But his best opponent Lucian Bute with 879 points before their bout on 2012-05-26 got out of scope after 18 months on 2013-11-26.
Now his best opponent is Mikkel Kessler with only 473 points before their bout.
This was somewhat less than the required 50% of his own rating. So Froch lost some points.
also i saw solis vs leif larsen previosuly.
why when solis won by UD he lost points and larsen won points.
So Froch was penalised for not choosing required quality opponents within the last 18 months.
Regarding Solis:
Solis lost points due to a relatively close decision on points and due to his superior rating before the bout.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
ty for that
Out of interest...
Whats the highest points value that a fighter has had (so highest value during career)
and whats the biggest points gain that a fighter has had from a fight? I'm sure that second one has been answered before but I couldn't see anything through a search
Out of interest...
Whats the highest points value that a fighter has had (so highest value during career)
and whats the biggest points gain that a fighter has had from a fight? I'm sure that second one has been answered before but I couldn't see anything through a search
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Not the case. Bute's subsequent fights do not impact Frochs points, indeed they arent talking about Butes subsequent 18 months, but Frochs.cold187 wrote:but its not frochs fault that bute has notbeen fighting (or maybe it is). this way froch is penalised points due to another pesons inactivity.computerrank wrote:Froch had a rating of 1042 points after his win on 2013-11-23.
But his best opponent Lucian Bute with 879 points before their bout on 2012-05-26 got out of scope after 18 months on 2013-11-26.
Now his best opponent is Mikkel Kessler with only 473 points before their bout.
This was somewhat less than the required 50% of his own rating. So Froch lost some points.
The point decrease is down to the fact that in the last 18 months he hasnt fought as good a standard of opponent (according to the database) to replace Bute, who drops out of the calculation, as we see, just after the Groves fight.
Nothing to do with Butes fights subsequently, everything to do with Froch not keeping (according to the database) to the same standard of opponent
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
maybe kessler and groves didnt have as much points as bute did. but surely the calibre of the fighters and their ranking on boxrec should also be taken into account. groves and kessler were top 5 opponents on boxrec.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Boxrec doesn't take into account rankings, but the point ratings only.cold187 wrote:maybe kessler and groves didnt have as much points as bute did. but surely the calibre of the fighters and their ranking on boxrec should also be taken into account. groves and kessler were top 5 opponents on boxrec.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Highest career rating (ratings after the bout)@matt___s wrote:ty for that
Out of interest...
Whats the highest points value that a fighter has had (so highest value during career)
and whats the biggest points gain that a fighter has had from a fight? I'm sure that second one has been answered before but I couldn't see anything through a search
Code: Select all
+------------+-------------+------+------------+------------+------+------------+
| first_name | last_name | r_a | first_name | last_name | r_b | date |
+------------+-------------+------+------------+------------+------+------------+
| Rocky | Marciano | 6523 | Archie | Moore | 3349 | 1955-09-21 |
+------------+-------------+------+------------+------------+------+------------+
Last edited by computerrank on 02 Dec 2013, 16:46, edited 1 time in total.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Biggest points gain@matt___s wrote:ty for that
Out of interest...
Whats the highest points value that a fighter has had (so highest value during career)
and whats the biggest points gain that a fighter has had from a fight? I'm sure that second one has been answered before but I couldn't see anything through a search
Code: Select all
+------------+-------------+--------+------------+-------------+------------+
| first_name | last_name | r_diff | first_name | last_name | date |
+------------+-------------+--------+------------+-------------+------------+
| Billy | Backus | 2115 | Jose | Napoles | 1970-12-03 |
| Joey | Giardello | 1935 | Dick | Tiger | 1963-12-07 |
| Randy | Turpin | 1931 | Sugar Ray | Robinson | 1951-07-10 |
| Young | Corbett III | 1839 | Fred | Apostoli | 1938-02-22 |
| Young | Corbett III | 1839 | Fred | Apostoli | 1938-02-22 |
| Lew | Jenkins | 1805 | Lou | Ambers | 1940-05-10 |
| Sammy | Angott | 1781 | Bob | Montgomery | 1942-03-06 |
| LC | Morgan | 1755 | Jose | Napoles | 1966-08-22 |
| Jersey Joe | Walcott | 1730 | Ezzard | Charles | 1951-07-18 |
| Rocky | Marciano | 1719 | Archie | Moore | 1955-09-21 |
| Fritzie | Zivic | 1656 | Henry | Armstrong | 1940-10-04 |
| Mike | Kaplan | 1648 | Fritzie | Zivic | 1941-04-18 |
| Fred | Apostoli | 1621 | Young | Corbett III | 1938-11-18 |
| Willie | Joyce | 1612 | Henry | Armstrong | 1943-03-02 |
| Del | Flanagan | 1597 | Virgil | Akins | 1958-09-18 |
| Freddie | Cochrane | 1591 | Fritzie | Zivic | 1941-07-29 |
| Sugar Ray | Leonard | 1590 | Marvin | Hagler | 1987-04-06 |
| Eduardo | Duarry | 1581 | Tony | Herrera | 1933-09-18 |
| Chuck | Woods | 1544 | Tony | Canzoneri | 1935-02-26 |
| Al Bummy | Davis | 1538 | Bob | Montgomery | 1944-02-18 |
| Beau | Jack | 1521 | Bob | Montgomery | 1943-11-19 |
| Lou | Ambers | 1511 | Tony | Canzoneri | 1936-09-03 |
| Billy | Soose | 1506 | Ken | Overlin | 1940-07-24 |
+------------+-----------+--------+------------+---------------+------------+-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16782
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Is there a way of finding out what the top ten heavyweights looked like the day after Buster Douglas beat Mike Tyson?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Geez Martin, you should be getting a paycheck at this point.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
:!:JCS wrote:Geez Martin, you should be getting a paycheck at this point.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
keithmoonhangover wrote:Is there a way of finding out what the top ten heavyweights looked like the day after Buster Douglas beat Mike Tyson?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16782
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
computerrank wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Is there a way of finding out what the top ten heavyweights looked like the day after Buster Douglas beat Mike Tyson?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
that is fcuking quality. and yes you do deserve a special nod martin, JCS said next time he sees you he's getting you a pint from all of us.computerrank wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Is there a way of finding out what the top ten heavyweights looked like the day after Buster Douglas beat Mike Tyson?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
computerrank wrote:Biggest points gain@matt___s wrote:ty for that
Out of interest...
Whats the highest points value that a fighter has had (so highest value during career)
and whats the biggest points gain that a fighter has had from a fight? I'm sure that second one has been answered before but I couldn't see anything through a search
Code: Select all
+------------+-------------+--------+------------+-------------+------------+ | first_name | last_name | r_diff | first_name | last_name | date | +------------+-------------+--------+------------+-------------+------------+ | Young | Corbett III | 1839 | Fred | Apostoli | 1938-02-22 | | Young | Corbett III | 1839 | Fred | Apostoli | 1938-02-22 | +------------+-----------+--------+------------+---------------+------------+
thats a duplicate result there
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
I see Roberts Helenius is ranked 5th despite not fighting since March. ![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)