Justifying Ali as the best BOXER ever.. (read b4 u vote plz)

did my arguement have any effect on your p4p ranking thoughts??

Yes
5
21%
No
19
79%
 
Total votes: 24

BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

First of all Bob Satterfield didn't fight in the 1970's and never got a title shot. He was a contender in the 1950's who wouldn't have made it anywhere close to the top 10 in the 1970's.
whatare u talking about, bob satterfield would have eaten alive the likes of jurgen blin who was a top 10 contender. satterfield would defintley be a top 10 contender. hischin would let him down though



silkov to say ali is a class above louis is ridiculous.


- prime ali was nearly knocked out by 180lb henry cooper, angelo dundeee had to save alis ass for that fight.



i agree with sherlock, ali may have faced the hardest hitters, but NEVER faced as great a puncher as joe louis. louis would exploit alis flaws.
great trainer jack blackburn would totally pick apart alis flaws and totally prepare louis.

- if anyone was to put ali down for the count, its louis.


- silkov says a 70s ali would beat louis. FRAZIER BEAT ALI , and louis had just as good left hook as frazier, PLUS A HELL OF A LOT MORE.


- ali in the 60s its easy to pick apart his record if u want.
i didnt want to have to do this but its needed, and though i dont mean it, i want to show u how easy it is to make ali look overated.

u guys make him out to be a god, so




"Zora Folley (79-11-6) Folley was a former light-heavyweight once weighing as low as 178 pounds for a professional fight. He had lost 7 times before coming into this fight with Ali, 6 times by knockout. One of those losses was to Alejandro Lavorante (career record 19-5), who only had 13 pro fights at that time. Folley would only win half of his next 10 fights after losing to Ali before retiring. Why are the great majority of Ali’s opponents of this inferior quality? Why is this not talked about more? This was a title defense for the heavyweight championship of the world. Folley was not a fit title challenger.


Ernie Terrell (45-9). Another highly over-rated opponent of Ali. Who did he beat that was any good? Look at the career records of some of his opponents; Tunney Hunsaker (15-15) failed to break the .500 mark, Amos Lincoln (39-13-3) was hardly inspiring. Herb Siler was 15-12 this was Terrell’s 26th pro fight and he was still fighting bums. He won a split decision over Cleveland Williams but was also knocked out by Williams. His only significant victories were decisions over Eddie Machen (50-11-3), George Chuvalo (73-18-2), and Doug Jones (30-10-1) none who were much better than 2nd rate contenders themselves, except for Machen who was marginally better. But the Machen that lost to Terrell was on his downswing in his last 2 years of fighting. So we can see that Terrell really beat no one special in his career.
But there is more to the story. Terrell managed to lose to a number of journeymen and even fourth rate shoemakers in his career. He lost not once but twice to Johnny Gray a 190 pounder with a career mark of 16-10-1. He was beaten by Wayne Bethea (28-18-4). He also lost to Thad Spencer (32-13-1) and Manuel Ramos (25-29-3) had a losing mark for his career. These fourth-raters beat Terrell as easily as had Muhammad Ali who failed to score a knockdown or stop this big bum. Terrell was also beaten by none other than the hapless Chuck Wepner and stopped in the first round by Jeff Merritt. Ali’s win over Terrell hardly makes him great. Once again we see that beating so called contenders whose ability is far below that of their reputations is what forges the Ali legend.




Cleveland Williams (78-13-1). Williams was a big, strong, powerful puncher at one time, but alas not when Ali fought him as he had a bullet inside of him as a victim in a shooting incident. Williams was physically not the fighter he had been a few years previous and was given a title opportunity as retirement pay. The win over Williams was simply not the real Cleve and is therefore insignificant in making a case for Ali as being a great fighter off this win.




Karl Mildenberger (56-6-3). Before facing Ali the German had previously been knocked out in seven rounds by Helmut Ball for the German light-heavyweight title, and in one round by Dick Richardson for the European heavyweight title. Despite his lack of boxing ability and his rather fragile china chin he went into the 12th round against the light-hitting Ali. This is so typical; a fighter who would not last 3 rounds with Joe Louis extends Ali and makes him look bad. Ali struggled to finish his opponent in this fight. Mildenberger had his moments as in the 4th round when he landed two jolting lefts to the liver and launched a two fisted attack that drove Ali to the ropes. Ali won clearly but it took him far too long to accomplish the task against a raw fighter of this low quality. Ali could not knock him out quicker than a light-heavyweight could! This fight demonstrates clearly what an abysmal puncher and finisher that Ali really was.



At 6’0” and 201 lbs, Brian London was not a legitimate contender. His record was 35-13 at the time he faced Ali. He finished with a journeyman’s record of 37-20-1. London was knocked out 11 times in his career. Every decent fighter he met in the ring stopped him. He was even decisioned by light-heavyweight Willie Pastrano. There’s not much more one can say about London. He was the typical Ali opponent. Another bum, ho hum.

How good was Henry Cooper ? He has been elevated because of his performance against Ali in their first fight. In truth, he was never a good fighter. He was 27-8-1 when Ali first faced him, and he had been knocked out or stopped five times. One of those knockout losses was to Peter Bates whose career mark was 31-15-4; another was to Uber Bacilieri who achieved an abysmal 23-20-3 record. Clearly a fighter who lost to bums such as these can hardly be classified as even a second rate fighter.

Henry Cooper is remember for one reason he nearly knocked out Muhammad Ali in their first fight with a single left hook to the jaw. The NY Times reported that the punch, “caught Clay on the side of the jaw and Cassius went over backwards through the ropes. He rolled back into the ring, then got dazedly to his feet. He was gazing off in the distance…starry-eyed. He wobbled forward gloves low. He started to fall but his handlers caught him.”

But there is more to the story. Seeing that Clay/Ali was out in the corner they used smelling salts to revive him. Then they cheated in order to illegally give their fighter more than the legal one minute rest. The rules state that if a fighter cannot answer the bell in the allotted one minute rest period he is deemed the loser by technical knockout. Dundee took his finger and ripped a tear into Ali’s glove. Angelo Dundee has told this story many times. Since there were no extra gloves in the corner Ali was given up to five minutes of rest time to recover from the knockout that he actually suffered against a third tier heavyweight. Given enough time he was able to recover and came back to win not by kayo but by a nasty cut.

But that is not all that can be said about Ali’s fights with Cooper. Even in the second fight Cooper showed that a third tier heavyweight who was slow of hand and foot could hit Ali with jabs without trouble. Because he never learned how to block a jab he was always vulnerable against any fighter with any semblance of boxing skill and not the bums, third tier heavyweights and raw, wild amateur sluggers that he preferred to fight.




There is only one more fighter on Ali’s record worth mentioning and that is the one that made his reputation, Sonny Liston (50-4). Liston was a great fighter who could box and punch. The problem with basing Ali’s asserted greatness on his fights with Liston is that they were both fixed.

Liston was owned by the mob this is a well known and established fact. Charles Farrell, wrote,

http://www.boxingranks.com/Articles/Article646.htm

“After the second Patterson fight, there were no viable opponents for Liston. Aside from Ali, he had thoroughly destroyed every possible title aspirant. No one thought he could be beaten and, more importantly, no one was willing to pay to see him beat up anyone else.

Sonny was getting old…and he had no great love for fighting. It didn’t make economic sense to have him fight an endless series of low paying title defenses for another ten years. The guys who controlled his career decided that it was better to make two huge, quick scores.

They fixed the fight in Miami. Ali never knew about it. Liston’s people bet huge amounts, getting almost eight to one odds, on Ali. Because the conclusion of the first fight was so ambiguous, Liston remained a betting favorite—at about seven to five—in the rematch. The wiseguys got to clean up twice with the same play. It’s clear that, in the second fight, Ali spotted what was going on the moment Liston went down from a non-punch. But Ali was a very quick study, and made his press release adjustments by the time he was out of the ring." - possted by Monte Cox boxing historian (thanx monte)


this was a peak alis career, and one could pick apart his 70s career too if u wanted too.
Last edited by BrocktonBlockbuster49 on 23 Nov 2005, 15:42, edited 1 time in total.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:
First of all Bob Satterfield didn't fight in the 1970's and never got a title shot. He was a contender in the 1950's who wouldn't have made it anywhere close to the top 10 in the 1970's.
whatare u talking about, bob satterfield would have eaten alive the likes of jurgen blin who was a top 10 contender. satterfield would defintley be a top 10 contender. hischin would let him down though



silkov to say ali is a class above louis is ridiculous.


- prime ali was nearly knocked out by 180lb henry cooper, angelo dundeee had to save alis ass for that fight.



i agree with sherlock, ali may have faced the hardest hitters, but NEVER faced as great a puncher as joe louis. louis would exploit alis flaws.
great trainer jack blackburn would totally pick apart alis flaws and totally prepare louis.

- if anyone was to put ali down for the count, its louis.


- silkov says a 70s ali would beat louis. FRAZIER BEAT ALI , and louis had just as good left hook as frazier, PLUS A HELL OF A LOT MORE.


- ali in the 60s its easy to pick apart his record if u want.
i didnt want to have to do this but its needed, and though i dont mean it, i want to show u how easy it is to make ali look overated.

u guys make him out to be a god, so




Zora Folley (79-11-6) Folley was a former light-heavyweight once weighing as low as 178 pounds for a professional fight. He had lost 7 times before coming into this fight with Ali, 6 times by knockout. One of those losses was to Alejandro Lavorante (career record 19-5), who only had 13 pro fights at that time. Folley would only win half of his next 10 fights after losing to Ali before retiring. Why are the great majority of Ali’s opponents of this inferior quality? Why is this not talked about more? This was a title defense for the heavyweight championship of the world. Folley was not a fit title challenger.


Ernie Terrell (45-9). Another highly over-rated opponent of Ali. Who did he beat that was any good? Look at the career records of some of his opponents; Tunney Hunsaker (15-15) failed to break the .500 mark, Amos Lincoln (39-13-3) was hardly inspiring. Herb Siler was 15-12 this was Terrell’s 26th pro fight and he was still fighting bums. He won a split decision over Cleveland Williams but was also knocked out by Williams. His only significant victories were decisions over Eddie Machen (50-11-3), George Chuvalo (73-18-2), and Doug Jones (30-10-1) none who were much better than 2nd rate contenders themselves, except for Machen who was marginally better. But the Machen that lost to Terrell was on his downswing in his last 2 years of fighting. So we can see that Terrell really beat no one special in his career.
But there is more to the story. Terrell managed to lose to a number of journeymen and even fourth rate shoemakers in his career. He lost not once but twice to Johnny Gray a 190 pounder with a career mark of 16-10-1. He was beaten by Wayne Bethea (28-18-4). He also lost to Thad Spencer (32-13-1) and Manuel Ramos (25-29-3) had a losing mark for his career. These fourth-raters beat Terrell as easily as had Muhammad Ali who failed to score a knockdown or stop this big bum. Terrell was also beaten by none other than the hapless Chuck Wepner and stopped in the first round by Jeff Merritt. Ali’s win over Terrell hardly makes him great. Once again we see that beating so called contenders whose ability is far below that of their reputations is what forges the Ali legend.




Cleveland Williams (78-13-1). Williams was a big, strong, powerful puncher at one time, but alas not when Ali fought him as he had a bullet inside of him as a victim in a shooting incident. Williams was physically not the fighter he had been a few years previous and was given a title opportunity as retirement pay. The win over Williams was simply not the real Cleve and is therefore insignificant in making a case for Ali as being a great fighter off this win.




Karl Mildenberger (56-6-3). Before facing Ali the German had previously been knocked out in seven rounds by Helmut Ball for the German light-heavyweight title, and in one round by Dick Richardson for the European heavyweight title. Despite his lack of boxing ability and his rather fragile china chin he went into the 12th round against the light-hitting Ali. This is so typical; a fighter who would not last 3 rounds with Joe Louis extends Ali and makes him look bad. Ali struggled to finish his opponent in this fight. Mildenberger had his moments as in the 4th round when he landed two jolting lefts to the liver and launched a two fisted attack that drove Ali to the ropes. Ali won clearly but it took him far too long to accomplish the task against a raw fighter of this low quality. Ali could not knock him out quicker than a light-heavyweight could! This fight demonstrates clearly what an abysmal puncher and finisher that Ali really was.



At 6’0” and 201 lbs, Brian London was not a legitimate contender. His record was 35-13 at the time he faced Ali. He finished with a journeyman’s record of 37-20-1. London was knocked out 11 times in his career. Every decent fighter he met in the ring stopped him. He was even decisioned by light-heavyweight Willie Pastrano. There’s not much more one can say about London. He was the typical Ali opponent. Another bum, ho hum.

How good was Henry Cooper ? He has been elevated because of his performance against Ali in their first fight. In truth, he was never a good fighter. He was 27-8-1 when Ali first faced him, and he had been knocked out or stopped five times. One of those knockout losses was to Peter Bates whose career mark was 31-15-4; another was to Uber Bacilieri who achieved an abysmal 23-20-3 record. Clearly a fighter who lost to bums such as these can hardly be classified as even a second rate fighter.

Henry Cooper is remember for one reason he nearly knocked out Muhammad Ali in their first fight with a single left hook to the jaw. The NY Times reported that the punch, “caught Clay on the side of the jaw and Cassius went over backwards through the ropes. He rolled back into the ring, then got dazedly to his feet. He was gazing off in the distance…starry-eyed. He wobbled forward gloves low. He started to fall but his handlers caught him.”

But there is more to the story. Seeing that Clay/Ali was out in the corner they used smelling salts to revive him. Then they cheated in order to illegally give their fighter more than the legal one minute rest. The rules state that if a fighter cannot answer the bell in the allotted one minute rest period he is deemed the loser by technical knockout. Dundee took his finger and ripped a tear into Ali’s glove. Angelo Dundee has told this story many times. Since there were no extra gloves in the corner Ali was given up to five minutes of rest time to recover from the knockout that he actually suffered against a third tier heavyweight. Given enough time he was able to recover and came back to win not by kayo but by a nasty cut.

But that is not all that can be said about Ali’s fights with Cooper. Even in the second fight Cooper showed that a third tier heavyweight who was slow of hand and foot could hit Ali with jabs without trouble. Because he never learned how to block a jab he was always vulnerable against any fighter with any semblance of boxing skill and not the bums, third tier heavyweights and raw, wild amateur sluggers that he preferred to fight.




There is only one more fighter on Ali’s record worth mentioning and that is the one that made his reputation, Sonny Liston (50-4). Liston was a great fighter who could box and punch. The problem with basing Ali’s asserted greatness on his fights with Liston is that they were both fixed.

Liston was owned by the mob this is a well known and established fact. Charles Farrell, wrote,

http://www.boxingranks.com/Articles/Article646.htm

“After the second Patterson fight, there were no viable opponents for Liston. Aside from Ali, he had thoroughly destroyed every possible title aspirant. No one thought he could be beaten and, more importantly, no one was willing to pay to see him beat up anyone else.

Sonny was getting old…and he had no great love for fighting. It didn’t make economic sense to have him fight an endless series of low paying title defenses for another ten years. The guys who controlled his career decided that it was better to make two huge, quick scores.

They fixed the fight in Miami. Ali never knew about it. Liston’s people bet huge amounts, getting almost eight to one odds, on Ali. Because the conclusion of the first fight was so ambiguous, Liston remained a betting favorite—at about seven to five—in the rematch. The wiseguys got to clean up twice with the same play. It’s clear that, in the second fight, Ali spotted what was going on the moment Liston went down from a non-punch. But Ali was a very quick study, and made his press release adjustments by the time he was out of the ring.”


this was a peak alis career, and one could pick apart his 70s career too if u wanted too.
Saying Ali is a class above Louis is being honest... Ali is a class above most of the other heavyweight champions... the two closest to him in ability imo are Johnson and Holmes.
We could argue all year about it but will not change the other persons mind. I've talked about the Liston fights till I've gone green and have given up trying to talk sense into people... it suits a lot of people to believe that Ali was involved in fixed fights etc... but if you really think Liston would throw away the title and the two fights with Ali were fixed then your boxing knowledge is not as good as I thought it was.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

In the July 1991 Ring Magazine I had a letter published giving four reasons why I thought Muhammad Ali would have defeated Joe Louis had these two all time great heavyweights ever met in their respective primes. These four reasons sum up how most modern boxing fans think of a potential Ali-Louis battle: 1) Ali had greater speed, especially of foot. 2) Ali had the ability to adapt and change his fight plan while Louis tended to be more robotic. 3) Ali had the better chin and successfully absorbed the bombs of some of boxing’s most dangerous sluggers. 4) Ali was never beaten at his best; his first loss came at age 29.

Having grown up as a fan of Muhammad Ali it is sometimes difficult to be objective. I felt a need to prove this popular theory to myself. I began an intensive study of the two great heavyweights particular styles by thoroughly studying films of both fighters, as well as the opinions of other knowledgeable historians and trainers. Within a year I published an article in the May 1992 Boxing Scene “Joe Louis: The Best Heavyweight Ever!" In this article I argued that out of all the heavyweight champions it was Joe Louis who most closely resembled the perfect fighter. I concluded the Louis-Ali match-up as a toss up that could go either way. After more years of study I now firmly believe that Joe Louis could defeat Muhammad Ali. The following describes the how and why.

Muhammad Ali has become such a legend that people think of him as invincible. One person wrote to me that Ali was a “demi-god”. I admit it’s pretty impossible to defeat a deity. However, Ali was not a god, but a human being and as such had human frailties. As Jack Dempsey once said “no man has everything.” Ali had a number of weaknesses as a fighter. He did not have an orthodox style and never learned the rudiments of classical boxing. Ali made many tactical errors in the ring. Ali did not know how to properly hold his hands, or how to duck (he pulled back or sidestepped), nor did he know how tp parry or to block a jab!

Ken Norton’s trainer Eddie Futch said, (Anderson pg. 233), “The jab was a big reason Muhammad Ali never figured out why he had so much trouble with Ken Norton in their three fights.”

In the May 5, 1969 Sports Illustrated, in an article, "Clay-Ali: The Once and Future King", Ali demonstrated how he avoided a jab. He relied on judging the distance and leaning away as in the photograph left He didnt know how to block a jab! If you look at Ali on film, he held his right hand out to the side and did not have it in position to block a jab. That is why Ali had problems with certain fighters like Doug Jones and Norton, fighters with a good left jab could cause him great difficulty.

Norton consistently hit Ali with his jab because Ali didn't keep his right hand up to parry Norton’s counter jab. Ali leaned away from punches. He dropped his hands low. He threw a right uppercut from the outside and dropped his right hand every time before he threw it! This is precicely why Ali was vulnerable to the left hook througout his career. A thorough study of film reveals these flaws in Ali's style. These poor habits caused him trouble with quick handed boxers who had solid left hands.

Joe Louis said of Ali in his autobiography (Louis p 260), “Ali’s a great fighter, (but) he made too many mistakes, his hands are down a lot, and he takes too many punches to the body. I know what I’m talking about.”

Technically, Ali wasn't a very good fighter; it was just that his physical gifts (speed, reflexes, and chin) were so astonishing that he was able to get away with things that would have gotten most fighters beaten up. Some may argue he did end beaten up when his career was over. George Foreman noted on his web-site (http://www.georgeforeman.com) that after Ali’s speed diminished “it became apparent that he never really learned defense.”

So many Ali worshippers are under the impression that Ali was "unhittable" in his prime. This is a myth. George Chuvalo, a limited fighter who lacked both skills and punching power had sucess at times against a prime Ali with a body attack. Chuvalo who lacked both speed and hitting accuracy managed to catch Ali flush on the chin with a solid right cross in the 13th round. In both fights with Henry Cooper Ali was hit cleanly by a very average fighter. Even in their second fight Cooper managed to land a fair number of left jabs and hooks as Ali leaned away from punches before Cooper was badly cut.

Ali's tactic of leaning away from punches was considered suicidal by the old-timers. This with good reason, such a tactic could be exploited by a good feinter. Fortunately for Ali, the art of feinting has been an all but lost art since WW2, especially amongst heavyweights. Joe Louis, however, did use occasional feints to set up his devastating counter-punches. Caswell Adams of the New York Herald-Tribune wrote, March 31, 1935, "Louis can punch with terrific power...He can feint a foe out of position." By catching Ali coming back after leaning away from a feint, his counter-punches would land with double impact!

Ali's chin was among the best in heavyweight history, but no man’s chin is impregnable. Ali was nearly kayoed by Henry Cooper’s left hook.

The June 19, 1963 NY Times reported, “It caught Clay on the side of the jaw and Cassius went over backwards through the ropes. He rolled back into the ring, then got dazedly to his feet. He was gazing off in the distance…starry-eyed. He wobbled forward gloves low. He started to fall but his handlers caught him.” Had that punch not come at the end of the round he would have been in serious jeopardy.

Ali also struggled against Doug Jones. The lesson from that fight is not whether Ali deserved the decision, but that a small heavyweight of modest ability was able to be competitive with him. Fighters with quick hands and good left jabs always caused him technical problems. Against Louis, Ali would be facing one of the fastest and most powerful jabbers in boxing history.

Now, consider the statement by Murray Goodman, (Boxing Scene. Spring 1995), that Joe Louis “could knock you out with a left jab.”

Historian Mike Silver wrote, (Ring Almanac, p 122, 1998) “There was kayo power in every one of Joe Louis punches, but the most important of all was the battering ram of a jab, which was equal in power to an ordinary heavyweights right cross.”

Boxing historian and writer Ted Carroll summarized a potential Ali vs. Louis match-up, (Ring, July 1966), “Louis had one of the fastest right hands ever seen in a ring. It boomed out of his slow moving gait with the speed and suddenness of a rattler. Clay’s defensive technique relies greatly upon leaning backward out of range of his opponent’s blows. Against a right hand of Louis speed and power this would have been a highly dangerous maneuver and the current champion would have been flirting with disaster every time he tried it. It is possible to conceive Clay getting a decision over Louis in a bout that lasted the full 15 rounds. But it is not so easy to imagine his going the distance without getting tagged by Louis fast hands somewhere along the way. When that happened it could mean the end of everything right then and there for Muhammad Ali.”

Carroll also noted that boxers with great footwork such as Conn and Pastor had given Louis trouble. But Ali was not as correct a boxer as Billy Conn or Bob Pastor. Ali had many faults in his style. Joe Frazier nearly knocked him out in the 11th round of their first fight as Ali exposed himself with in the corner with his hands down. A crunching left hook, the punch that Ali was vulnerable to throughout his career, had Ali wobbling around the ring in serious trouble. Louis was a faster and by far a more accurate and powerful puncher than Frazier was. He was the finest combination puncher in heavyweight history, and possibly the greatest finisher. If Louis had Ali hurt the way Frazier did in the 11th round there is no way Ali would have survived.

Ali’s legs were doing the “dance that puppets do when the guy with the strings is drunk.” -Bob Waters, Newsday, Mar 1971

Had that been Joe Louis in there instead of Joe Frazier it would have been over! Louis was a deadly finisher and didn't let his man off the hook when hurt. The “Brown Bomber” was the epitome of the hooded assassin. In fact the saying goes "Once Joe Louis had his man hurt...."

Foreman had Ali out on his feet by Muhammad’s own admission (Ali pg. 406-409). George Foreman and Earnie Shavers were arguably heavier hitters than was Louis, but they were not nearly as explosive or quick with their hands. George and Earnie were limited fighters who ran out of gas in the later rounds. Foreman was the heavyweight destroyer non-pareil, who owned the first five rounds of any fight, but by the sixth he was done. Shavers tried to pace himself in his fight with Ali, and consequently failed to go after him after he had him hurt. Louis had 15 round stamina and kept his power into the late rounds. Louis was a constant knockout threat throughout a fight, while Ali only had to make it though the early rounds against Shavers and Foreman, who threw a lot of wild haymakers, wasting their limited energy. Louis didn’t make that mistake, throwing short, jolting, economically sound punches. Louis would pick his shots and take apart any man who placed himself on the ropes.

The “rope-a-dope” would not work against Louis, in much the same way it didn’t work against Frazier in Manila. In that fight, he absorbed a terrible beating to the body.

“Ali slumped into his corner at the end of the 10th round exhausted and contemplated quitting”, Sports Illustrated, Oct 13, 1975.

Louis would pressure Ali, like Frazier and Norton. Ali didn’t like pressure, as he preferred to box from the outside. Joe Louis once described how he would have fought Ali, The Ring, Feb. 1967:

“The kid has speed and there’s no one around to outbox him, and the opponent who tries is in his grave. Especially in the middle if the ring. I’d see to it that Clay didn’t stay in ring center. No. He’d be hit into those ropes as near a corner as I could get him. If he stayed on the ropes he would get hurt. Sooner or later he’d try to bounce off, when he did he would get hurt more. I’d press him, cut down his speed, and bang him around the ribs. I’d punish the body. “Kill the body and the head will die”, Chappie use to tell me. It figures. Sooner or later he’d forget about that face of his and he would start dropping that left hand like he did against Mildenberger and Chuvalo. Those fellows got their openings by accident, and fouled it up. I would work for it and wouldn’t reckon to miss when it arrived. Cassius Clay is a nice boy and a smart fighter. But I am sure Joe Louis would have licked him.”

Joe Frazier fought this battle plan mapped out by Louis in 1967 almost to perfection in 1971. Frazier began working the body early. He punished Ali along the ropes, and when his opening finally came (in the 11th and again in the 15th) Frazier took advantage. Smokin’ Joe failed to score a knockout that day but his victory was decisive. The plan almost worked in the third fight as well, Ali absorbed such a beating he said it was “the closest thing to death” that he had ever experienced.

Kenny Norton used a very similar plan. Eddie Futch instructed Norton, (Anderson p 235), “Your not going to hit Ali by slipping, dropping underneath or parrying. You have to hit him while he’s punching. When he starts to jab you punch with him. Keep your right hand high. His jab will pop into the middle of your glove and then your jab will come right down the pipe…that is what destroyed Ali’s rhythm.”

Futch further planned out the following, (Anderson p 235), “If you start from the center of the ring it will only take you three steps to get Ali on the ropes. Every time you jab, step in and jab again. Then do the same thing.” Then Eddie told him what to do when he got Ali to the ropes, “Don’t do like all the other guys do. Don’t throw your left hook to the head, he’ll pull back against the ropes and pepper you with counter-punches, instead start banging his body with both hands.” That is how Norton, whose jab, speed, and power was inferior to Joe Louis, gave Ali hell in three very close fights.

Joe Louis trainer Jack Blackburn was a master boxer, an all-time great lightweight who fought heavyweights. He was a genius at boxing strategy and at least the equal of men like Ray Arcel and Eddie Futch. Blackburn would have devised a plan to defeat Ali using the same strategy that Joe spoke of in 1967. He would have seen the same weaknesses that Futch used to instruct Frazier and Norton to defeat Ali. Ali did not hold his right hand in place to block the counter-jab. Chappie Blackburn would tell Joe, “he’s a sucker for a left jab.” Louis had the perfect classic style to defeat Ali. It would not matter that Ali’s jab would “get there first.” Joe would block Ali’s jab with his right glove held high, his chin tucked under his shoulder (see picture left) and counter Ali in the middle of his face with his own jab just as Norton did. He would use the jab to maneuver Ali to the ropes.

Goodman noted that Louis was a “master at cutting off the ring.”

Ali said, (The Greatest p 405), that he was forced to go to the ropes against Foreman, “All during training I had planned to stay off the ropes…but now I’ve got to change my plans. Sadler and Moore have drilled George too well. He does his job like a robot but he does it well…I’m famous for being hard to hit in the first rounds, but no fighter can last (dance) fifteen if he has to take six steps to his opponents three.”

Joe would put continuous physical and psychological pressure on Ali. Louis would cut off the ring and step Ali towards the ropes, where he would then pound the body. Muhammad would then begin to drop his hands. Blackburn would instruct him “when he drops his right hand to throw the uppercut, deliver the knockout drops with the left hook.” Joe Frazier exploited this same flaw when he dropped Ali in the 15th round of their first fight.

Eventually Louis would see an opening and strike. Goodman described a Joe Louis assault like this:

“There were no warnings with a Louis punch. He would lash out like a cobra, and it could be just as deadly.”

Jimmy Braddock was once asked what it was like to get hit by “The Brown Bomber’s” punch, “It ain’t like a punch,” Braddock said. “It’s like somebody nailed you with a crowbar!” -75 Years of The Ring, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1997 Section: The Best Puncher.

"All the blows in Joe Louis arsenal were so perfectly and precisely thrown every time that you get the sense watching him that he couldn't have been wild or sloppy if he tried." --William Dettloff in the 2004 Ring Almanac describing his selection of Joe Louis at #1 among the 100 greatest punchers of all time.

Louis punches were not just heavy punches like Foreman or Shavers but fast and explosive punches. Ray Arcel, one of the greatest trainers in history worked against Louis in 14 of his fights, said, (Anderson, 120), "Louis once drove Paulino Uzcudin's teeth right through his mouthpiece!" Arcel said it was the hardest punch he ever saw. Not Joe Frazier, not George Foreman, not Earnie Shavers had that kind of dynamite behind their punches.

Louis would catch Ali along the ropes with one of his most powerful and deadly hooks. Unlike Frazier, Joe Louis could throw a triple left hook with speed and power as he did against Max Baer. Ali’s legs would turn to jelly. Louis combinations would fire with piston like precision and the power of a human jackhammer. The speed of Louis assault would be mesmerizing. Ali would be battered unmercilessly and unceasingly until the referee was forced to call an end to the execution.

Some "analysts" never bother to study films and therefore don't see the technical flaws in Ali's style demonstrated in this article. Instead they make a pointless argument as to how well some of Louis opponents would have done against Ali or the quality of Ali's opposition as compared to Louis. It doesn't matter. Styles make fights. Billy Conn and Max Schmeling did not have Joe Louis physical attributes or his style. Ken Norton had the style to give Ali fits; a right parrying hand to block Ali's jab-a good left jab in return, pressure on the inside, a strong body attack and a good left hook that Ali was susceptible to. Joe Louis had all these attributes and was a faster and far more powerful and explosive puncher than Ken Norton was.

Joe Louis was not well prepared for some of his opponents because he didn't know much about them, but any fighter that gave Louis trouble the first time was destroyed in rematches. Louis was 10-0 in return engagements. Louis proved he could make the adjustments to defeat the weaknesses in an opponents style. Ali, despite all his innovativeness, never did understand why Norton gave him so much trouble. It was because Ali didn't know how to block a jab and Norton's trainer Eddie Futch knew how to exploit it. Eddie always believed that Louis had the style to beat Ali. In the March 1992 Ring, Futch picked Louis to stop Ali late in a mythical dream fight. I never understood why until I quit repeating the same old lame arguments and started really studying films. Joe Louis had the style to exploit Ali's technical flaws.

In comparison to my original somewhat superficial thoughts from my 1991 letter a more thorough examination of the facts shows the following to be true:

1. While Ali is the fastest heavyweight ever, Louis was nearly as fast with his hands. Ali’s many tactical mistakes would leave him open to one of Louis lightning-like strikes. His foot-speed and jab would be negated by Louis properly placed right parrying hand. Louis would render ineffective Ali’s primary weapon, his left jab, and drive him to the ropes vis-a-vis Ken Norton.

2. Ali was a master of strategy against slow handed bruisers like Liston, Terrell, Foreman, and Shavers. He had more trouble with men with hand speed who could punch with him like Doug Jones, Norton, and Jimmy Young. Louis was superior in hand speed to any of these men. With the previously outlined strategy, which Blackburn and Joe would be sure to implement, Louis would not be at a strategic disadvantage against Ali.

3. Ali had a great chin, but he was not a diety as some Ali worshippers claim. Nat Fleischer rated Joe Louis as the greatest finisher in ring history. Consider that Joe Frazier had Ali in serious trouble and he did not have Louis speed of delivery, combination punching ability, nor was he as deadly a finisher. Had it been Joe Louis he would have kayoed Ali in the first Frazier first fight, and also in the third. Liston, Foreman and Shavers were big punchers but slow, and could not carry on a sustained assault for 15 rounds. Louis definitely would keep up the pressure and he was a more explosive and sharper puncher in the mold of a young Mike Tyson. Louis had real shock value in his punches. Ali’s chin would have its greatest test not against Frazier or Foreman but against Joe Louis.

4. Ali was never beaten until a 3-year lay-off, but it was still close to his physical prime. Some would say he lost to Doug Jones, and he was nearly kayoed by Cooper so his unbeaten streak is not without tarnish. In comparing Ali when he retired at age 36 after beating Spinks his record was 56-3 with 37 kayos. Louis when he retired as champion at age 35 was 60-1 with 51 kayos. Louis also lost four of his best years due to WW2 just as Ali lost 3 ½ years in his forced exile. Overall Ali faced the better competition, but Max Schmeling (a first rate counter-puncher), Max Baer (one of the hardest hitters in division history), Arturo Godoy (never knocked off his feet in his first 70 pro fights), and Jersey Joe Walcott (one of the slickest boxer-punchers of all time) are better than anyone that Ali faced during his prime years, with the exception of Sonny Liston. Both Ali and Louis were dominant champions.

Ali had a slight edge in size over Joe. Ali was 6’3” 212 pounds in his prime, and had an 80-inch reach. Louis was 6’1 ½”, and about 207, his best weight in his rematches against Buddy Baer and Abe Simon. Louis had a 76” reach. Louis height and reach was about the same as Norton, or Evander Holyfield. Frazier was 205 in the first Ali-Frazier fight, so any physical advantage is void. Joe Louis had the hand speed, the jab, the power, the stamina, the ring smarts and the style to defeat Muhammad Ali. Joe Louis is the one man who would knock Muhammad Ali out!











http://coxscorner.tripod.com/alilouis.html
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

silkov, note what i said. "I did do not believe most of what i wrote, but i was simply proving a case u can put down anyones record."


first liston fight was real, 2nd liston fight liston gave up.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

IMO
Louis would punish Ali for his mistakes. Ali, while fast, often telegraphed his punches, and Louis had the reflexes of a leopard. They at least matched Ali's. Louis' handspeed was not far behind, and he vastly exceeds Ali in power. Ali never liked a guy with a good jab - Louis had an excellent one, and was an expert at exchanging jabs. His style was built primarily around counter punching, and a fast, powerful counterpuncher who applies subtle pressure is the kind of fighter to beat Ali. Louis was a very fast handed heavyweight, throwing remarkably tight concise and hard fast punches, and he would have pressed Ali constantly, shuffling forward behind his jab. Ali never fought anybody that had close to the mix of speed power and combination punching that Louis had, and who had a ramrod jab that would nullify the jab of Ali. look at the way ali pulled back alot and how sucseptible to left hooks, louis had one of the best left hooks in history and would defintley catch ali leaning back.



- people use the conn fight as an example, but thats nonsense. louis was terriby dehydrated for that fight.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:silkov, note what i said. "I did do not believe most of what i wrote, but i was simply proving a case u can put down anyones record."


first liston fight was real, 2nd liston fight liston gave up.
Well I don't really see the point of writing something you don't believe... but the fact is I don't see Louis beating Ali... this doesn't mean I see Louis as a poor champ etc... Ali was just too fast. Its true about Norton, but Louis didn't fight like Norton, he was much strighter... one of the things that made Norton so awkward was his croutch. Norton would I think have given Louis a lot of trouble too as he would have nulified Louis jab. The Ali of his pre exile years would have had a much easier time with Norton, but the Ali of the 70s couldn't dance all night anymore and that was the big difference between him in the 60s and 70s and why he really had to reconstruct his whole style. You can pick holes in anyones record but in all honesty Ali's record is really the hardest to do this with... he fought in an amazing era, he fought everyone there was and he dominated his division for close to 20 years... you can't really ask any more from a great champion than that.
Rory McCloskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1042
Joined: 29 Jun 2005, 13:11

Post by Rory McCloskey »

louis is a great all time heavyweight and if theres anyone out there that i would want to put into the ring with ali in hopes of victory, well he would be the man, but i really dont see winning this one. Ali was much larger, he was quicker, and louis' ability to swarm would be severally limited due to the fact that ali had the quickest footspeed of any heavyweight. i think louis would not be ready for the speed of ali, and i think ali slowlky but surely picks away at louis and ends the fight somewhere around the 10th. not an especially close fight. but i could be wrong.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

rory just wondering, who do u think wins between louis vs holmes???




- ali had many flaws, and the greatest puncher of all time a great counterpunch like louis would exploit them.


dont think alis chin was unbreablable, a 180lb cooper nearly knocked ali out and angelo had to cheat to get ali more recovery time
theone
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1655
Joined: 13 Sep 2005, 17:12

Post by theone »

ali had many flaws, and the greatest puncher of all time a great counterpunch like louis would exploit them.
Louis's flaws would be his kryptonite against Ali. He was slow afoot and could be stunned and dropped by quick snapping punches. Cooper may have stunned Ali, But Schmeling ko'd Louis.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

theone wrote:
ali had many flaws, and the greatest puncher of all time a great counterpunch like louis would exploit them.
Louis's flaws would be his kryptonite against Ali. He was slow afoot and could be stunned and dropped by quick snapping punches. Cooper may have stunned Ali, But Schmeling ko'd Louis.

it took schmeling 12 rounds of hard right hands to finally get louis, who corrected his flaw .

cooper needed one left hook to knock ali senseless
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

You know when I read all this I come away with one clear conclusion. It would be a damn good fight.

My money would be on Ali. Wonder how the bookmakers would set it?

Oh.....and too bad it won't happen, In a stunning turn of events, I heard Joe's Manager is having him fight Jack Johnson instead, And Don King is promoting the "Champion of the Ages" with Ali Facing Dempsey. I doubt this thing will ever come off they just keep avoiding each other.

Personally I think it's all about the money.
Rory McCloskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1042
Joined: 29 Jun 2005, 13:11

Post by Rory McCloskey »

louis vs. holmes...

im taking louis in this fight. I think holmes has a definate size advantage but i do not think as highly of holmes as do others. i still have him top 10 nevertheless, but i think louis CAN catch holmes with hsi fleurries and swarms of punches, and i think that either louis wins somewhere in the 8-9 round, or he doesnt catch holmes and wins by UD.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

Rory McCloskey wrote:louis vs. holmes...

im taking louis in this fight. I think holmes has a definate size advantage but i do not think as highly of holmes as do others. i still have him top 10 nevertheless, but i think louis CAN catch holmes with hsi fleurries and swarms of punches, and i think that either louis wins somewhere in the 8-9 round, or he doesnt catch holmes and wins by UD.

holmes 6'3.5 210lbs

louis 6'2 207lb


holmes has 1.5 " and 3lbs, THAT IS NOTHING
Rory McCloskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1042
Joined: 29 Jun 2005, 13:11

Post by Rory McCloskey »

louis was 207 more around the time of the walcott and charles and marciano fights no? wasnt he somewhere around 195 for schmelling/braddock/baer? i could be wrong.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

Rory McCloskey wrote:louis was 207 more around the time of the walcott and charles and marciano fights no? wasnt he somewhere around 195 for schmelling/braddock/baer? i could be wrong.
in 1941-1942 louis weighed anyhwere from 199-207llb

in arguebally louis peak fight buddy baer II 1942, louis age 27 weighed 207lb.


louis against walcott weighed 211 and 213


louis against marciano 214


louis against charles 218




louis in 1942 206-207lbs was even stronger than in 38 and at only 27 was in his prime.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Holmes would beat Louis for the same reason Ali would... they had the exact style to beat joe.... you only need to look at Louis' career to see that.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

silkov wrote:Holmes would beat Louis for the same reason Ali would... they had the exact style to beat joe.... you only need to look at Louis' career to see that.
holmes got hit with many right hands throughout his career, and louis had one of the best. i have no doubt louis will get to holmes with his right hand. holmes had flaws in his defense and got caught by less punchers thaan louis

louis would box with holmes wait for the opening and catch holmes and knock him out. and trust me, louis will finish holmes when he has him hurt.
Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Post by Ambling Alp »

BB -Not sure how to respond to your comments since you don't believe all them yourself, but I thought I would respond to some.

First about Bob Satterfield, I thought that he saying that Satterfield fought in 1970's but I guess he meant that Satterfield was comparable to Shavers (which isn't a good comparson).
I just don't understand the fascination people have with Satterfield. His record was just 50-25-4, with many of his losses to journeyman. He has few big wins, I guess the biggest win over Cleveland Williams who was a last minute replacement.
He was supposed to be such a big puncher, yet he only scored 31 kos in 79 fights, that's nothing impressive. I have seen him on tape and he didn't show me anything. I can't believe he should have been in the top 10 when he fought in the 1950's which I think almost anyone would agree wasn't as good as the 1970's for heavyweights.
Earnie Shavers certainly had his limitations, but he was much, much better than Satterfield.

As for the Ali-Louis comparison, sure you can go through any fighter and nitpick that they had a tough fight against this guy or got knocked down by this guy, so I won't go too much into that.

I just don't think that it's valid to say that since Norton gave Ali trouble that Louis would beat Ali. Remember Ali was 31 when he fought Norton the first time and 34 the last time. His speed was mostly gone. I think that if Ali would have fought Norton when he still had his speed he would have beaten Norton fairly easily.(Which Norton himself freely has admitted).

So if you are comparing say the 1935-1941 Louis to Ali in the second part of his career, Louis may have been better. But I would argue that Ali in the 1960's would have beaten Louis at his best. I also think that Ali in the early 1970's would have beaten the post WWII Louis.
Rory McCloskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1042
Joined: 29 Jun 2005, 13:11

Post by Rory McCloskey »

silkov wrote:Holmes would beat Louis for the same reason Ali would... they had the exact style to beat joe.... you only need to look at Louis' career to see that.
some club fighter might have the same style as ali but it doesnt matter. its the way u execute it. and ali ius the only one who can execute it well enough to beat a prime louis.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Rory McCloskey wrote:
silkov wrote:Holmes would beat Louis for the same reason Ali would... they had the exact style to beat joe.... you only need to look at Louis' career to see that.
some club fighter might have the same style as ali but it doesnt matter. its the way u execute it. and ali ius the only one who can execute it well enough to beat a prime louis.

So now Holmes is a club fighter is he???.... thats madness!... how many fights of Holmes at his peak have you seen?... if you really believe that then I just can't take you seriously... Holmes was one of the top 3 heavyweights of all time and I rate him higher than Louis....
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:
silkov wrote:Holmes would beat Louis for the same reason Ali would... they had the exact style to beat joe.... you only need to look at Louis' career to see that.
holmes got hit with many right hands throughout his career, and louis had one of the best. i have no doubt louis will get to holmes with his right hand. holmes had flaws in his defense and got caught by less punchers thaan louis

louis would box with holmes wait for the opening and catch holmes and knock him out. and trust me, louis will finish holmes when he has him hurt.
Holmes always got up though didn't he. The fighters that caught Holmes like Shavers and Weaver and Cooney punched as hard or harder than Louis, if they couldn't ko Larry, Louis wouldn't. Also Louis was vulnerble to the right-hand himself, far more than Holmes was and Holmes probably had the power in his right to ko Louis rather than the other way around.
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

this is definetly the best thread i have seen on the boxers of the past forum, great arguments for both sides.
i dont think its right to dissect Ali's early career the way you did brockton, anyone with your knowledge of boxing could do the same thing to joe loius record if they wanted to (i am not that man)
however you are entitled to your opinion and i respect it (as you are a very knowledgable person)
my personal opinion is that Ali wins a 15 round decsion over joe
or maybe a late KO
SteveO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1381
Joined: 31 Dec 2001, 20:00

Post by SteveO »

Well, it's all subjective but I have to agree with the arguments made by Silkov and Boxbuzz. In my humble opinion a prime Ali would have totally outclassed and frustrated the brown bomber.
After being continually peppered with jabs and a target that wouldn't stay still Joe would have wondered what he had gotten himself into.
I would pick Ali as a clear points winner - maybe even forcing a late stoppage due to facial damage.
Rory McCloskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1042
Joined: 29 Jun 2005, 13:11

Post by Rory McCloskey »

silkov wrote:
Rory McCloskey wrote:
silkov wrote:Holmes would beat Louis for the same reason Ali would... they had the exact style to beat joe.... you only need to look at Louis' career to see that.
some club fighter might have the same style as ali but it doesnt matter. its the way u execute it. and ali ius the only one who can execute it well enough to beat a prime louis.

So now Holmes is a club fighter is he???.... thats madness!... how many fights of Holmes at his peak have you seen?... if you really believe that then I just can't take you seriously... Holmes was one of the top 3 heavyweights of all time and I rate him higher than Louis....
i never said hes a club fighter, i think hes top 10, im trying to justify that the same style doesnt mean the same result. holmes wasnt as talented as ali, or louis for that matter. and a prime louis or prime ali both beat holmes.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Rory McCloskey wrote:
silkov wrote:
Rory McCloskey wrote: some club fighter might have the same style as ali but it doesnt matter. its the way u execute it. and ali ius the only one who can execute it well enough to beat a prime louis.

So now Holmes is a club fighter is he???.... thats madness!... how many fights of Holmes at his peak have you seen?... if you really believe that then I just can't take you seriously... Holmes was one of the top 3 heavyweights of all time and I rate him higher than Louis....
i never said hes a club fighter, i think hes top 10, im trying to justify that the same style doesnt mean the same result. holmes wasnt as talented as ali, or louis for that matter. and a prime louis or prime ali both beat holmes.

Well thats your opinion. I think Holmes was a better boxer than louis and a far more intelligent boxer. You have to give him credit for being able to mix it with the top fighters when he was in his mid-40s... at his best he had probably the best jab that the division has seen... to say Holmes wasn't as talented as Louis is wrong imo... Holmes was faster, cleverer, had a better jab in his prime... he also fought as better opposition than Louis.... Peak Holmes is probably the hardest fight for a peak Ali there is... there is a good argument for ranking only Ali above Holmes in the heavyweight all time list... I would give Larry the edge over every other champion.
Unfortunately Holmes is probably the most underrated champion in many quarters, people just seem unable or unwilling to admit what a great boxer and champion he was.
Post Reply