Betting thread

The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Betting thread

Post by The Insider »

cutsman wrote:
Best to take sky's 18/1 on bellew rds 1-6
Interesting. Might be worth a punt. Stranger theyngs have happened.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

The Insider wrote:
cutsman wrote:
Best to take sky's 18/1 on bellew rds 1-6
Interesting. Might be worth a punt. Stranger theyngs have happened.
Hmmm. It's a big price but in my view Bellew just hasn't shown anything to suggest he can hang with Stevenson. I see him as being on Don George's level - we'll see if he can take as much punishment. My guess is he can't.
chiggsy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 03:09

Re: Betting thread

Post by chiggsy »

Silakh to win

Bellew to win

Sturm to win

Treble pays 93/1 with sky bet.

The chances of it coming in.......?

Very slim but it's only a fiver so hey ho. :D
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: Betting thread

Post by SteveDow »

I think Sillakh is huge at 8/1 with Sky Bet to beat Kovalev. Granted, Kovalev may well starch him early but Sillakh is a world class talent and if he survives the early onslaught I could see him outboxing Kovalev.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

SteveDow wrote:I think Sillakh is huge at 8/1 with Sky Bet to beat Kovalev. Granted, Kovalev may well starch him early but Sillakh is a world class talent and if he survives the early onslaught I could see him outboxing Kovalev.
Big if. I can see Sillakh folding very early under the bulldozer-like pressure exerted by Kovalev. Early on I thought Sillakh was a really exciting prospect but then he got beat by Grachev who was subsequently starched by the sub-standard Edwin Rodriguez. Hmmm.

I feel like Kovalev is like Golovkin in that either is to be beaten, the opponent will have to be very tough and slick. A technical boxer with a dig, or if they don't have a dig they need to have a good engine with a great defence and some moves (IE, Ward).

I feel like Stevenson doesn't fit the profile to beat Kovalev as I don't see him staying out of trouble for the whole fight. It's obviously possible his power could cause Sergey problems, but at this stage I don't trust Stevenson's ability to pull through a war, whereas Kovalev looks pretty damn sturdy.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Guys I have a question. I put a 5 fold accumulator on but accidentally hit number of lines = 5 and it multiplied my intended stake by 5. What does this mean for my accumulator? and how is it different from a standard accumulator???

Thanks
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Betting thread

Post by The Insider »

Riddick Blowe wrote:Guys I have a question. I put a 5 fold accumulator on but accidentally hit number of lines = 5 and it multiplied my intended stake by 5. What does this mean for my accumulator? and how is it different from a standard accumulator???

Thanks
Have you now bet each selection as a single win now too as well.as the Accumulator.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

The Insider wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Guys I have a question. I put a 5 fold accumulator on but accidentally hit number of lines = 5 and it multiplied my intended stake by 5. What does this mean for my accumulator? and how is it different from a standard accumulator???

Thanks
Have you now bet each selection as a single win now too as well.as the Accumulator.
Dunno, is it that? That I have put 5 singles on and the accumulator in addition? Would that make sense because why would it give added value on five singles.. looks like this

£0.00
Date Receipt Bet Type Number Of Lines Total Stake Paid
0000057 Accumulator (5) (To win) 5 £115.00
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Anyone?
So after a huge weekend last week I am on for another monstrous accumulator.

Leicester Rugby WIN
Glasgow Rugby WIN
Stevenson stoppage 1-6
Sturm/Barker to go distance
Chisora stoppage
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Betting thread

Post by WelshJack »

Kovalev, Stevenson and Chisora fights under 11 rounds is almost 2/1
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Betting thread

Post by reggaereggae »

You can get 20-1 Sillakh points at Skybet
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Betting thread

Post by Hagler2002 »

Been a while since I've had a punt but I've gone in quite large on Stevenson in rounds 1-6 @ 13/8
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Betting thread

Post by The Insider »

Not really bothered this weekend, just had a few tiny outrageous bets to keep me interested.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Betting thread

Post by lefty »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
SteveDow wrote:I think Sillakh is huge at 8/1 with Sky Bet to beat Kovalev. Granted, Kovalev may well starch him early but Sillakh is a world class talent and if he survives the early onslaught I could see him outboxing Kovalev.
Big if. I can see Sillakh folding very early under the bulldozer-like pressure exerted by Kovalev. Early on I thought Sillakh was a really exciting prospect but then he got beat by Grachev who was subsequently starched by the sub-standard Edwin Rodriguez. Hmmm.

I feel like Kovalev is like Golovkin in that either is to be beaten, the opponent will have to be very tough and slick. A technical boxer with a dig, or if they don't have a dig they need to have a good engine with a great defence and some moves (IE, Ward).

I feel like Stevenson doesn't fit the profile to beat Kovalev as I don't see him staying out of trouble for the whole fight. It's obviously possible his power could cause Sergey problems, but at this stage I don't trust Stevenson's ability to pull through a war, whereas Kovalev looks pretty damn sturdy.
Based on what exactly? He's never been in with anyone with a real dig at world level.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Betting thread

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Hagler2002 wrote:Been a while since I've had a punt but I've gone in quite large on Stevenson in rounds 1-6 @ 13/8
Was looking at that or AS rounds 1-4 @11/4.

Still undecided.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Betting thread

Post by lefty »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Been a while since I've had a punt but I've gone in quite large on Stevenson in rounds 1-6 @ 13/8
Was looking at that or AS rounds 1-4 @11/4.

Still undecided.
What are the odds on a late stoppage for Stevenson? Say between 9-12? I struggle to see Bellew getting blown out really early.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Any chance Bellew toughs it out into the later rounds? I've got Adonis 1-6 but I'm a bit worried
jessi
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Betting thread

Post by jessi »

I've got £17 on a bellew win at 4/1 and £3 on the draw at 25/1 :bag:
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Betting thread

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

My top tips for tonight:

Skeete Points and Chisora Stoppage. Double pays just over 6/5

Happy betting folks!
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Betting thread

Post by Finn »

Derek Chisora to stop Ondrej Pala between rounds 5 and 8
Adonis Stevenson to stop Tony Bellew within 12 rounds (Sorry Tony)
Bradley Skeete to beat Colin Lynes outright
and
Sergey Kovalev to stop Ismayl Sillakh within 6 rounds

i've bet the Lucky 15 accumulator. But the odds on the 4 fold are 11.68/1
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Betting thread

Post by Deno1986 »

Sticking a bit of loose change on Sillakh on points at 16/1 for a bit of interest. He's a talented guy but has chin issues so wouldn't be surprised to see him get stopped early but if he can fight a cautious fights he has the skills to outbox Kovalev.

That's all for me this weekend.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Riddick Blowe wrote:Anyone?
So after a huge weekend last week I am on for another monstrous accumulator.

Leicester Rugby WIN
Glasgow Rugby WIN
Stevenson stoppage 1-6
Sturm/Barker to go distance
Chisora stoppage
Holy mother, I just need Barker/Sturm to go the distance now and it's another champagne accumulator for me.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Betting thread

Post by Hagler2002 »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Anyone?
So after a huge weekend last week I am on for another monstrous accumulator.

Leicester Rugby WIN
Glasgow Rugby WIN
Stevenson stoppage 1-6
Sturm/Barker to go distance
Chisora stoppage
Holy mother, I just need Barker/Sturm to go the distance now and it's another champagne accumulator for me.
What's the odds on that lot m8?
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Betting thread

Post by WelshJack »

I was wondering what people thought about next weekend as there is some money to be made. Malignaggi and Judah has me unsure who would you back for that?
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Hagler2002 wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Anyone?
So after a huge weekend last week I am on for another monstrous accumulator.

Leicester Rugby WIN
Glasgow Rugby WIN
Stevenson stoppage 1-6
Sturm/Barker to go distance
Chisora stoppage
Holy mother, I just need Barker/Sturm to go the distance now and it's another champagne accumulator for me.
What's the odds on that lot m8?
Think it was 12/1 mate. Funny thing, I accidentally put 5 times the stake on it I meant to because I somehow ended up with 5 lines in the accumulator. Hagler, do you know what this '5 lines' business means for my accumulator as opposed to an accumulator of five with one line? I can't seem to find out anywhere.

Bet Placed At 29/11/2013

Bet Type Accumulator (4)

Stake Per Line £23.00

Number Of Lines 5

Total Stake Paid £115.00
Last edited by Bard of Boxrec on 01 Dec 2013, 08:56, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply