Howard Foster

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 01 Dec 2013, 11:04

Great to see last night Howard Foster reffing fights so soon after last week!!!

A world class ref and a top man!!!

Stick in there pal

bodyactive · Post by **bodyactive** » 01 Dec 2013, 11:14

Spud wrote:Great to see last night Howard Foster reffing fights so soon after last week!!!

A world class ref and a top man!!!

Stick in there pal

Great news well done howard

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 01 Dec 2013, 13:41

It was poor timing by Howard & hopefully he becomes less panicky in similar situations.
He is probably are best referee,I did have him above Ritchie Davies, but he's no.2 for now.

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 01 Dec 2013, 14:23

hurlock wrote: He is probably are best referee,I did have him above Ritchie Davies, but he's no.2 for now.

I bet he will be gutted

palooka · Post by **palooka** » 01 Dec 2013, 14:24

I'm glad he's got back in, he stopped the fight too early but didn't ought to hounded from something he enjoys and is good at; hope the doorstep death threats get less frequent as well.

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 01 Dec 2013, 14:38

taffytoon wrote:
hurlock wrote: He is probably are best referee,I did have him above Ritchie Davies, but he's no.2 for now.
I bet he will be gutted

I did say for now!!!

He's still got a chance!!

Teddy's Toupee · Post by **Teddy's Toupee** » 01 Dec 2013, 15:28

palooka wrote:I'm glad he's got back in, he stopped the fight too early but didn't ought to hounded from something he enjoys and is good at; hope the doorstep death threats get less frequent as well.

You've had your final warning from plod, palooka, so let's hope so.

tijuana1 · Post by **tijuana1** » 01 Dec 2013, 16:57

Howard Foster is a great bloke and ref, I would have no problem him referring any of my son's fights in the future. Safe man. Keep it up Howard.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 01 Dec 2013, 17:24

He should have been suspended after the Froch vs Groves fight.

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 01 Dec 2013, 17:30

Horse wrote:He should have been suspended after the Froch vs Groves fight.

You should be banned from this site but there you go

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 01 Dec 2013, 17:35

taffytoon wrote:You should be banned from this site but there you go

Stop giving me abuse, it's getting a bit boring now.

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 01 Dec 2013, 17:39

Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:You should be banned from this site but there you go
Stop giving me abuse, it's getting a bit boring now.

Bit like all your posts zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 01 Dec 2013, 17:42

Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:You should be banned from this site but there you go
Stop giving me abuse, it's getting a bit boring now.

Not as boring as your crappy p4p rankings.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 01 Dec 2013, 17:48

Wales wrote:Not as boring as your crappy p4p rankings.

Who rattled your cage?

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:07

Horse wrote:He should have been suspended after the Froch vs Groves fight.

stfu you stupid ****

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:12

Horse wrote:
Wales wrote:Not as boring as your crappy p4p rankings.
Who rattled your cage?

Read through the comments on your p4p rankings earlier where you had Murray above Barker because you had murray beating Martinez and strum on your card. By that ethos shouldn't you have groves over Froch?

Gave my cage a good old rattle did that.

palooka · Post by **palooka** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:13

Spud wrote:
Horse wrote:He should have been suspended after the Froch vs Groves fight.
stfu you stupid ****

Thought you'd mellowed?

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:13

Spud wrote:stfu you stupid ****

Foster should have been investigated by the police.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:16

Wales wrote:Read through the comments on your p4p rankings earlier where you had Murray above Barker because you had murray beating Martinez and strum on your card. By that ethos shouldn't you have groves over Froch?

Froch might have got a legitimate stoppage if Foster hadn't stopped it.

Wales wrote:Gave my cage a good old rattle did that.

Are you okay now?

Lightsoot · Post by **Lightsoot** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:17

Howard's a great ref and a genuine bloke, I'm convinced of that. 99% of the time he ALWAYS gets it right but, that aside, I thought he acted too hastily last weekend which was hugely frustrating. However, I still feel that he, along with Victor Loughlin, are the UK's best referees. The likes of IJL and Terry O'Connor have left something to be desired for a long time, Howard is a million miles away from that.

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:20

Horse wrote:
Spud wrote:stfu you stupid ****
Foster should have been investigated by the police.

Now I know you are being a stupid ***t

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:30

Horse wrote:
Wales wrote:Read through the comments on your p4p rankings earlier where you had Murray above Barker because you had murray beating Martinez and strum on your card. By that ethos shouldn't you have groves over Froch?
Froch might have got a legitimate stoppage if Foster hadn't stopped it.

Wales wrote:Gave my cage a good old rattle did that.
Are you okay now?

*might* might not.

bodyactive · Post by **bodyactive** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:39

Spud wrote:
Horse wrote:He should have been suspended after the Froch vs Groves fight.
stfu you stupid ****

Back on form spudly hahaha

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 01 Dec 2013, 18:55

Horse wrote:
Spud wrote:stfu you stupid ****
Foster should have been investigated by the police.

You either need to get yourself some help or get back on the tablets you fornicating idiot.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 01 Dec 2013, 19:00

taffytoon wrote:You either need to get yourself some help or get back on the tablets you effing idiot.

Based on what?

Howard Foster

Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster

Re: Howard Foster